Boney said:aww let daddy comfort you.. what's wrong?
Gravijah said:
It'll end up just like the Bob Ross game on the Wii.ILikeFeet said:HOLY SHIT! A Martha Stewart game by Majesco? Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck
Nooooooooooooo! It must be real! Where else can I not pay taxes and shove a turkey up my ass?AceBandage said:It'll end up just like the Bob Ross game on the Wii.
EatChildren said:MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT
[*]BloodRayne: The Shroud
EatChildren said:So, what E3 no-show games from our big ol list of 3DS games do you guys expect to make an appearance?
*list*
Stage On said:I hope it's going to come this year.
I mean seriously knowing it's coming soon who is going to spend money on ds instead of a 3ds now? I was thinking of getting a newer ds to replace my fat in august because the battery is nearly dead but it didn't make sense to spend the money on that when I could wait a little while longer and get the superior system I'd want anyhow.
amtentori said:meh, dont care when it comes out. huge backog on ds still.
will wait for much better revision.
Gravijah said:YOU CAN PLAY DS GAMES ON THE 3DS! :O
amtentori said:$200at least
amtentori said:$200at least
the most interesting thing about the 3Ds will be nintendo playing catchup in terms of graphics on its own console.
amtentori said:the most interesting thing about the 3Ds will be nintendo playing catchup in terms of shaders on its own console.
Bizzyb said:I've got good news and bad news....
ShockingAlberto said:Now, Nintendo is releasing games that third parties can easily outdo. They can compete with Nintendo on their own systems by virtue of the fact that Nintendo is not making the prettiest games on it.
I'm sure EAD will produce some games that push the system to its limits. Nintendo knows all the tricks 3DS has to offer because they have developed the entire system. That's why they have the upper hand compared to many 3rd parties, like with every console they've released.ShockingAlberto said:I think Nintendo is going to be happy with PSP/Wii levels of graphics while third parties are going to want to stand out.
Which is, quite honestly, a fantastic idea.
Most of the best looking games on the Wii were made by Nintendo. They knew the hardware inside and out and could produce good looking games for it that were usually of incredibly high quality. They hit that ceiling and the ceiling means that 3rd parties couldn't overcome it.
Now, Nintendo is releasing games that third parties can easily outdo. They can compete with Nintendo on their own systems by virtue of the fact that Nintendo is not making the prettiest games on it.
GCX said:I'm sure EAD will produce some games that push the system to its limits. Nintendo knows all the tricks 3DS has to offer because they have developed the entire system. That's why they have the upper hand compared to many 3rd parties, like with every console they've released.
EatChildren said:I just hope its not too much of a port machine. I'm happy Resident Evil is a new game, not so much that Metal Gear Solid is a re-worked release of 3. Same goes for Ocarina of Time. They'll be great time killers especially during the launch period, but I dont want to see third party 'big franchise' support boiling down to ports.
Gravijah said:Eh, it's near launch. I wouldn't worry too much about it.
Freezie KO said:If Wii taught us anything, it's that the level of third-party support at launch could very well set the stage for the entire generation.
Ports are pretty normal for a system launch though. It's almost impossible to get big new AAA games ready for launch so ports are an easy way to fill the gaps. That's why StarFox and OOT exist on 3DS.Freezie KO said:If Wii taught us anything, it's that the level of third-party support at launch could very well set the stage for the entire generation.
MGS3 alone looks better than Kid Icarus.Freezie KO said:That's never happened, and I don't expect it to. When Resident Evil is finally playable is will look comparable to Kid Icarus.
...a 3D port of a 2D DS tech demo Nintendo never considered good enough to actually release?Freezie KO said:That's never happened, and I don't expect it to. When Resident Evil is finally playable is will look comparable to Kid Icarus.
My big hope for third parties is that they actually show up with original games. It could be a problem if they just see 3D + Portable and think that's enough to resell their same ol' console games like MGS3 or Street Fighter 4. I don't want to see 3D Ports become the new Waggle Ports.
edit: and same goes for Nintendo with OoT, StarFox, and whatever else. Bring on stuff like Steel Diver.
Dreamwriter said:...a 3D port of a 2D DS tech demo Nintendo never considered good enough to actually release?
Will Nintendo be content with that though? It's not like Nintendo hasn't gone head to head with the best of 3rd parties, umm, with the SNES and NES (yeah, closest examples I could think of that weren't single games), nor have they as you mentioned avoided great looking games before. I could see Nintendo sticking with cartoony graphics, though much better than what we've been seeing after a year or so, while 3rd parties flee from cartoony graphics as they have like they're a cross shaped stake made out of garlic. Which I agree would be great, I really can't wait for a single system that combines great Nintendo games with great 3rd party games (yes I'm a 1 non-PC console and handheld cheapo these days).ShockingAlberto said:I think Nintendo is going to be happy with PSP/Wii levels of graphics while third parties are going to want to stand out.
Which is, quite honestly, a fantastic idea.
Most of the best looking games on the Wii were made by Nintendo. They knew the hardware inside and out and could produce good looking games for it that were usually of incredibly high quality. They hit that ceiling and the ceiling means that 3rd parties couldn't overcome it.
Now, Nintendo is releasing games that third parties can easily outdo. They can compete with Nintendo on their own systems by virtue of the fact that Nintendo is not making the prettiest games on it.
But your rant was about porting old 2D games to 3D, which is exactly what this is - heck, it's a port of a tech demo shown off before the DS's release 6 years ago, so it's not even taking advantage of the 3DS' graphical abilities, unlike games like Street Fighter IV. I'm not saying it's bad - I enjoyed playing the demo at E3, and the 3D effect was cool. But it's exactly the thing you were complaining about.Freezie KO said:Nintendo's always experimenting with new gameplay or game concepts. When they release it is up to them. Either way, it's a new game that plays completely new.
3D means nothing. Steel Diver is a 2D game played on a 2D plane. Always was.
They've been very content making subpar graphics for their Pokemon games - it's not even about them being "cartoony", when the first GBA Pokemon games came out, they looked like GBC games with a few more colors, while Golden Sun looked amazing yet still cartoony. Nintendo didn't care.Bending_Unit_22 said:Will Nintendo be content with that though?
abstract alien said:So darn excited! No bars though:^/
DS had pretty poor piss launch line-up, yet it picked up steam from thirdparites as time went on. Why 3DS would be different?Freezie KO said:If Wii taught us anything, it's that the level of third-party support at launch could very well set the stage for the entire generation.
So so awesomecelebi23 said:
I think its ok to see a broad range in development costs from title to title. I believe its possible for developers who have great ideas to be able to find ways to develop those ideas at a relatively low cost and make the resulting game a hit due essentially to the quality of the ideas.
On the other hand, I believe there will be developers who will use a similar amount of resources to create games as if developing for a home console, and such games also would result in satisfaction to our consumers.
I see the possibility for a broad range of software development costs to increase the possibility of satisfying Nintendo 3DS owners and really appeal to a very broad audience. That would be the ideal situation for Nintendo 3DS. We intend to exemplify this with our first-party titles.
Dreamwriter said:But your rant was about porting old 2D games to 3D, which is exactly what this is - heck, it's a port of a tech demo shown off before the DS's release 6 years ago, so it's not even taking advantage of the 3DS' graphical abilities, unlike games like Street Fighter IV. I'm not saying it's bad - I enjoyed playing the demo at E3, and the 3D effect was cool. But it's exactly the thing you were complaining about.
abstract alien said:So so awesome
Well yeah, not all (or most) Nintendo games are system maxing affairs.Dreamwriter said:They've been very content making subpar graphics for their Pokemon games - it's not even about them being "cartoony", when the first GBA Pokemon games came out, they looked like GBC games with a few more colors, while Golden Sun looked amazing yet still cartoony. Nintendo didn't care.
Sounds like he's saying Nintendo intends to lead with a wide range from high end show pieces for uebergamers to lower end affairs for others, and everything in between. Well, certainly seems like I was off anyways. Though I would definitely agree Nintendo will be outclassed in showpiece games for a year or 2.ShockingAlberto said:oh my god is that Iwata posting from the past to back up my point?!
http://www.ripten.com/2010/06/22/ni...opment-costs-3d-console-consideration-lbd416/
THANKS, IWATA
It's not often I see you fail at reading comprehension. It's nice to know you too, are just a human. "We intend to exemplify this with our first-party titles." means they'll do the full range themselves, from Brain Training to Mario Galaxy.ShockingAlberto said:oh my god is that Iwata posting from the past to back up my point?!
http://www.ripten.com/2010/06/22/ni...opment-costs-3d-console-consideration-lbd416/
THANKS, IWATA
I'm not saying they will only do low-budget titles.Soneet said:It's not often I see you fail at reading comprehension. It's nice to know you too, are just a human. "We intend to exemplify this with our first-party titles." means they'll do the full range themselves, from Brain Training to Mario Galaxy.
So they'll continue to operate just like they've been doing for the past 20 years, aka release one or two big-budget AAA games per year?ShockingAlberto said:Of course they'll still do the big stuff, but it won't be common.
RightGCX said:So they'll continue to operate just like they've been doing for the past 20 years, aka release one or two big-budget AAA games per year.
GCX said:Ports are pretty normal for a system launch though. It's almost impossible to get big new AAA games ready for launch so ports are an easy way to fill the gaps. That's why StarFox and OOT exist on 3DS.
No, they're saying everyone can do all budget-sized projects, both third-parties and themselves. Really, nothing is changed here when it comes to Nintendo's own software. Also, you're being inconsistent with your previous posts.ShockingAlberto said:I'm not saying they will only do low-budget titles.
I am saying they built the system with third parties doing the high budget stuff in mind.
Of course they'll still do the big stuff, but it won't be common. Meanwhile, on the Wii, the system was so limited that Nintendo did the best and the best third parties could do is as good as Nintendo.