PooBone
Member
There aren't many people I hate or hold such a grudge against in the industry but Pitchford is one of them. Will never ever spend a cent on anything the guy makes.
Activision is my new one. Bobby Kotick and the temple of greed.
There aren't many people I hate or hold such a grudge against in the industry but Pitchford is one of them. Will never ever spend a cent on anything the guy makes.
This is true.Pitchford also expressed that he believes that the market should judge a product, not the legal system.
About that...
Didn't the documents reveal that Sega moved the game away from what it was originally (Alien 3rd person RPG) and turned it into a shooter with the manifesto specifically targetting Call of Duty?
Sounds like they both messed up but I think Sega should be holding a huge part of the blame here.
Any more examples like these floating around? I guess I'm having a hard time not seeing both as really cruddy looking. Which is why I'm a little confused as the singling out of this game as an example of "false advertising" enough for it to go to court. I realize as well that the game itself is a turd but where is the line drawn for the wide amount of games that we take our lumps on when they fail to live up to their pre-release promise?
Any more examples like these floating around? I guess I'm having a hard time not seeing both as really cruddy looking. Which is why I'm a little confused as the singling out of this game as an example of "false advertising" enough for it to go to court. I realize as well that the game itself is a turd but where is the line drawn for the wide amount of games that we take our lumps on when they fail to live up to their pre-release promise?
Bravo!GAF: I just checked the company log. Dated 0-6-1-2-7-9, signed Pitchford, Randy J. You sent that game out there and you didn't even warn them. Why didn't you warn them, Pitchford?
Pitchford: Okay, look. What if that game didn't even exist, huh? Did you ever think about that? I didn't know! So now, if I went in and made a major development issue out of it, everybody steps in. SEGA steps in, and there are no Metacritic bonuses for anybody; nobody wins. So I made a decision and it was... wrong. It was a bad call, GAF, it was a bad call.
GAF: Bad call?
[GAF grabs Pitchford by his vest, shoves him against a wall]
GAF: This game is *dead*, Pitchford ! Don't you have any idea what you have done here? Well, I'm gonna make sure they nail you right to the wall for this! You're not gonna sleaze your way out of this one! Right to the wall!
[GAF lets go of Pitchford]
Pitchford: GAF...! You know, I... I expected more from you. I thought you'd be smarter than this.
GAF: I'm happy to disappoint you.
***
Pitchford: Look, this is an emotional moment for all of us, okay? I know that. But, let's not make snap judgments, please. This is clearly-clearly an important franchise we're dealing with and I don't think that you or I, or anybody, has the right to arbitrarily trash it.
About that...
Didn't the documents reveal that Sega moved the game away from what it was originally (Alien 3rd person RPG) and turned it into a shooter with the manifesto specifically targetting Call of Duty?
Sounds like they both messed up but I think Sega should be holding a huge part of the blame here.
Thats not true. The RPG which was supposed to be developed by obsidian entertainment was a different game than Colonial Marines, which was always supposed to be a FPS.
Here is a news article from 2006:
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/obsidian-developing-segas-alien-rpg/1100-6163134/
Just because there are more serious crimes committed in the world makes Pitchford not a criminal? He should not be subjected to the law because he only falsely advertised a product and took the money? It's a waste of the courts time to go after a guy like him?
I agree trying these cases is probably tricky and complicated but Randy thinking he should be off the hook legally sets a bad precedent.
He already did:Pitchford - keep talking bullshit and sooner or later you'll buy into it yourself.
Thats not true. The RPG which was supposed to be developed by obsidian entertainment was a different game than Colonial Marines, which was always supposed to be a FPS.
Here is a news article from 2006:
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/obsidian-developing-segas-alien-rpg/1100-6163134/
And then there was interferencewith three companies involved in decision-making on Pecan, bureaucracy was inevitable. According to one source, Sega's producers wanted Colonial Marines to feel like Call of Dutyin other words, more shooting marines, less shooting aliens. Upper staff at both Gearbox and TimeGate disagreed with this mentality, the source said, and there was a tug-of-war between developer and publisher on how the game should be designed.
The game is still being sold on official sites and Steam using media that is unrepresentative of the product and is NOT marked as unrepresentative.
Sega actually lost a case with the ASA in Britain where it was ruled CM *had* been falsely advertised.
I've had Randy Pitchford lie to my FACE about how this game - which was largely outsourced - was such a passion project to him, and I've watched their scripted gameplay demos that were in no way marked as unrepresentative of the final product. I've played a "pre-alpha" version of the multiplayer that, it turned out, was no different from the alleged gold version.
Randy Pitchford is a liar.
They offloaded it to Timegate and killed them off basically!
We will never get another Section 8 and I blame Gearbox!
Shut up and just make Borderlands 3 the game it should be already.
Remember when this company also lifted stuff straight from the Empire Strikes Back poster and didn't give proper credit?
I seriously hate Gearbox
I just said I can partially understand his comment pertaining that to a degree, but personally I do think there should be some sort of legal blowback/judgement on Randy/Gearbox considering what they did both publicly and internally as a company.
Ultimately I do think at some point we'll see a legal case fully go through pertaining to false advertising of game in it's final retail form compared to whatever earlier video or "demo" was shown of it.
Sorry, it sounded like I was attacking you, I wasn't.
Just pissed at Randy's justification that his crimes are okay when there are bigger fish to fry.
Pop culture reference: the game makes a pop culture reference and we are supposed to be shocked and outraged?
Remember when this company also lifted stuff straight from the Empire Strikes Back poster and didn't give proper credit?
I seriously hate Gearbox
Correct me if I'm wrong but, isn't that SW poster fan-made?
Also, the two are dissimilar enough to dispel that. Give me 10 minutes and I could find 10 more posters in the same style with the same colour palette.
Oh it's just the latest dodgy move around 'referencing' art in that game though. The whole games visual style was shifted from realistic to the Codehunters style, Gearbox even worked with that creator for a while before going quiet and stiffing him. In short Gearbox are scum with their constant pilfering of 'influences' without even trying to credit, let alone compensate, the original creator.
(http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkai...e-most-controversial-studios-in-the-industry/)
But Borderlands 2 was good??I'm surprised people still give Gearbox money, they actually used Sega's money for Borderlands 2.
Pitchford also expressed that he believes that the market should judge a product, not the legal system.
Oh yeah, i remember being dissapointed when i found about this, still didn't magically erase all the fun i had with the games.
Feel bad for the creator of the original short tho, because i wouldn't have given BL a chance if it looked like it originally did.
But Borderlands 2 was good??
I amazed at people's capacity to get worked up over things like this.
Yeah, the game was pretty bad. I gave it a shot, cringed as it sucked out loud right in front of me, and then life went on moments afterward. Am I missing out on something for not having let this in under my skin?
I amazed at people's capacity to get worked up over things like this.
Yeah, the game was pretty bad. I gave it a shot, cringed as it sucked out loud right in front of me, and then life went on moments afterward. Am I missing out on something for not having let this in under my skin?
I amazed at people's capacity to get worked up over things like this.
Yeah, the game was pretty bad. I gave it a shot, cringed as it sucked out loud right in front of me, and then life went on moments afterward. Am I missing out on something for not having let this in under my skin?
I amazed at people's capacity to get worked up over things like this.
Yeah, the game was pretty bad. I gave it a shot, cringed as it sucked out loud right in front of me, and then life went on moments afterward. Am I missing out on something for not having let this in under my skin?