Really looking forward to the next Jimquisition. I'm actually glad Pitchford spoke out this week, people forgot about what they did way too quickly.
Yup, paging Jim Sterling, Jim Sterling to this topic, please.
I amazed at people's capacity to get worked up over things like this.
Yeah, the game was pretty bad. I gave it a shot, cringed as it sucked out loud right in front of me, and then life went on moments afterward. Am I missing out on something for not having let this in under my skin?
They sure pulled a fast one on Sega and their fans.
Randy is shameless.
Randy, it's been more than 2 years. This is the part where you apologise for your garbage game and promise that you will never do it again (only to do it again). I suggest you contact Mr. Molyneux for training since he has perfected this craft.
This is just not the way.
Consiering that Borderlands 2 is the highest selling game of 2K's history, I can picture that publisher giving them a shit ton of money to make BL3.
Also, it was ever confirmed the whole "stealing from SEGA" thing ? It seems pretty hard to believe.
The North remembers.Really looking forward to the next Jimquisition. I'm actually glad Pitchford spoke out this week, people forgot about what they did way too quickly.
Randy, it's been more than 2 years. This is the part where you apologise for your garbage game and promise that you will never do it again (only to do it again). I suggest you contact Mr. Molyneux for training since he has perfected this craft.
This is just not the way.
Oh it's just the latest dodgy move around 'referencing' art in that game though. The whole games visual style was shifted from realistic to the Codehunters style, Gearbox even worked with that creator for a while before going quiet and stiffing him. In short Gearbox are scum with their constant pilfering of 'influences' without even trying to credit, let alone compensate, the original creator.
(http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkai...e-most-controversial-studios-in-the-industry/)
Welcome to the club. It's his only response to criticism of his business practices.EDIT: o man, I posted that link on his twitter and called him out (I know it's old news, but I couldn't not say something) and he blocked me...
The blame isn't Pitchford's alone. Sega, likely, evaluated and allowed to publish the game in its ultimate state. That speaks volumes about Sega's role and assesment in this case.
Welcome to the club. It's his only response to criticism of his business practices.
But @ 8:01 he says it's clear that the Wii U version will be the best looking console version. You know the version that never came out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZuUQy_T2I4
Welcome to the club. It's his only response to criticism of his business practices.
This combined with how much they're charging for the Handsome Collection just makes me dislike Gearbox even more.
People really sued them over a false demo? Why they didn't sue with the other million cases?
Bioshock Infinite also presented a fake demo and no one sued them, Ubi would be out of business if people would sue them over any false presentation, the examples are too many so why this fake demo was so special?
By now this is almost like a common practice.
This combined with how much they're charging for the Handsome Collection just makes me dislike Gearbox even more.
I think you'll find that's 2K's doing given it's the publisher.
What are they doing with Handsome Collection ? I haven't heard of any changes to the games....
Fixed.Raise your pitchfords!
Get out of here with this bullshit. Randy went on record countless times saying Gearbox was treating this with care, and showcased completely fake gameplay of the game. How sega mysteriously made the game shit outside of that fact makes no sense.Once again, I'm struck by how few people seem to grasp the difference between development and publishing.
Is the difference in role and responsibility really so opaque? Or are people so desperate to blame Pitchford personally that they are deliberately giving Sega a free pass?
For example I'm kinda aghast that a supposed media professional like Jim Sterling would chime in with the ludicrous charge that its somehow the developer's fault that: "The game is still being sold on official sites and Steam using media that is unrepresentative of the product and is NOT marked as unrepresentative."
That is as pure an example of the publisher failing to live up to their responsibilities as you can possibly find.
Get out of here with this bullshit. Randy went on record countless times saying Gearbox was treating this with care, and showcased completely fake gameplay of the game. How sega mysteriously made the game shit outside of that fact makes no sense.
Serious question: did they ever bother to patch Colonial Marines and make it decent?
It doesn't matter. The buck stops with the guy selling you the product. And Sega are the ones who decided that they were happy duplicating, marketing, and distributing it. And continue to earn from that decision to this day.
Its open-and-closed. Unless you somehow think that a vendor knowingly selling defective product is ok?
The blame isn't Pitchford's alone. Sega, likely, evaluated and allowed to publish the game in its ultimate state. That speaks volumes about Sega's role and assesment in this case.
So then the people sue Sega and Sega sues the shit out of Gearbox. Im fine with that. I dont have much investment in this as i never bought it but still angers me how much of a blatant liar Randy is.
There's a difference between what CDPR did with The Witcher 3 and what Gearbox did with Aliens. Watch the Sterling video where he literally compares segments of the game to the pre-release playthroughs and points out how little there is in common. The pre-release stuff is a complete fabrication.Why do everyone hate Gearbox when Ubisoft, CDPR and WB did the same thing?
Why do everyone hate Gearbox when Ubisoft, CDPR and WB did the same thing?
Randy's. Fucking. Attitude.Once again, I'm struck by how few people seem to grasp the difference between development and publishing.
Is the difference in role and responsibility really so opaque? Or are people so desperate to blame Pitchford personally that they are deliberately giving Sega a free pass?
For example I'm kinda aghast that a supposed media professional like Jim Sterling would chime in with the ludicrous charge that its somehow the developer's fault that: "The game is still being sold on official sites and Steam using media that is unrepresentative of the product and is NOT marked as unrepresentative."
That is as pure an example of the publisher failing to live up to their responsibilities as you can possibly find.
The best part about this is that I fucking hate Randy Pitchford with the irrational passion of a Kentucky preacher at a marriage equality protest, and now you all do too. The worst part is that now I feel like some kind of hatred-hipster.
Why do everyone hate Gearbox when Ubisoft, CDPR and WB did the same thing?