• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Japan's ruling party to reintroduce child pornography law revision

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well that's absolutely sick.

Isn't it?

Yeah, I knew that would happen, but it's a long-ass thread.

Anyway, I don't see any consensus on the matter, or much real discussion from people in the know either. ... Actually that's just because I've heard all these same arguments for and against lolicon productions before.

I just meant that people have already said that it's nothing to do with moe/loli.
 

Mr_Moogle

Member
I've accepted I will never enjoy an anime series as much as Cowboy Bebop ever again. What the Japanese market wants and what I want are two very different things unfortunately.
 

Mengetsu

Member
Thought this news was bump worthy.

Japanese police have reported the nation’s first child pornography arrest involving “computer generated” artwork.
Link: NSFW http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2013/07/11/cg-loli-arrest-japans-first/
Source: http://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/hl?a=20130711-00000049-jij-soci

According to reports, the 52-year-old Gifu city man was arrested for child pornography offences after allegedly selling computer generated images based on photographs of an actual minor.
The “CG” phrasing used in reports of the arrest is ambiguous as to whether 3D computer generated imagery was involved, or whether it was instead 2D imagery created using a computer art package.
Police say the arrest is the first in Japan of its type, although as usual they do not provide much in the way of details or any explanation as to why it was suddenly possible to make such an arrest when there has been no change in the law.
 

Horse Detective

Why the long case?
Yoko is 18...Yoko is 18...Yoko is 18...Yoko is 18...Yoko is 18...Yoko is 18...Yoko is 18...Yoko is 18...

200px-Yoko.jpg


Japan is screwed.

No 14 year old looks like that.
 
So who is being harmed here? Because lolicon keeps pedophiles off of real child pornography, where children are actually harmed.
 
article said:
According to reports, the 52-year-old Gifu city man was arrested for child pornography offences after allegedly selling computer generated images based on photographs of an actual minor.
YEEEEESH.

I think everyone can agree this is way way way way way beyond the lolicon grey zone.
 

Esch

Banned
More "8000 year old demon" lolis incoming
This. Theyll just sexualize characters who look like theyre elementary schoolers but claim to be in their 20s or something. Im all for free speech but fuck all this loli pedo shit.
 

Riposte

Member
I don't see how someone could want more reasons to put harmless people doing victimless activities into jail after being exposed to (and likely elsewhere complaining about) America's fucked up prison system. And likely have them marked for life for it too. Too much righteousness. I want to say it is nauseating.

EDIT: I don't need to say how dangerous it is to put people in jail because you find what they do disgusting.
 
I imagine the reasoning behind the CG stuff being illegal is because otherwise the bad guys could download real CP and when caught, say 'I thought it was CG.' That could be a fairly successful defense considering the high quality CG we get in movies and elsewhere. CG stuff being illegal eliminates that defense.
 
I don't see how someone could want more reasons to put harmless people doing victimless activities into jail after being exposed to (and likely elsewhere complaining about) America's fucked up prison system. And likely have them marked for life for it too. Too much righteousness. I want to say it is nauseating.

EDIT: I don't need to say how dangerous it is to put people in jail because you find what they do disgusting.
Regardless of how icky someone feels about lolicon, I'm completely baffled by anyone that has an opinion that's different than this.

It's the perfect convergence of crime without a victim, waste of legal prosecution, takes away resources from actual criminal investigations, clogging up the prison system for a non-violent offense, ruining someone's life, and the horrible ramifications of arbitrarily associating that someone with ACTUAL child pornography regardless if like most people, they'd vomit from thinking about it too much.

It's like prosecuting someone for murder in the fire degree for drawing fanart of the Hulk (or some other barely human outlandish caricature) killing a soldier.
 

Mudkips

Banned
It's not.

It is legal according to the Supreme Court.

There's a recent shitty law that flies in the face of the supreme court decision. The law has been used a few times, usually to tack on additional charges to people who have actually child pornography, but we already have a clear ruling on the matter from SCOTUS.
 

Horse Detective

Why the long case?
It is legal according to the Supreme Court.

There's a recent shitty law that flies in the face of the supreme court decision. The law has been used a few times, usually to tack on additional charges to people who have actually child pornography, but we already have a clear ruling on the matter from SCOTUS.
Thats good to know. It shouldnt be illegal.
 
It is legal according to the Supreme Court.

There's a recent shitty law that flies in the face of the supreme court decision. The law has been used a few times, usually to tack on additional charges to people who have actually child pornography, but we already have a clear ruling on the matter from SCOTUS.
You know all that and I bet Rita couldn't even name all seven houses of British Parliament.
 

Zeus Molecules

illegal immigrants are stealing our air
This would be passed in an instant if it also removed pixalated crotch shots from real life normal porn. Sales of tetris would fall suddenly as well.... but everyone can't be a winner
 

Irminsul

Member
But why facilitate the normalisation of such a sexual deviancy?
Well. what exactly is "normalised" here in your opinion? The sexual "deviancy" is, as far as we know, pretty much determined by genetic factors (IIRC, other factors aren't completely out of the equation, but it's mostly genes). So paedophiles can't really do anything about being attracted to children, but they can refrain from acting on it. Now, if there's a harmless alternative suited to, well, their needs (and no one is harmed by some drawings), what's the problem? It's not like anyone will become a paedophile by looking at the drawings, just as nobody turns gay by watching gay porn (note that I'm not equalling paedophiles and homosexuals or the "morality" of them acting on their sexual preferences, just the genetic origin of it).

So, the "problem" in my point of view is that the sexual needs of paedophiles can't ever be fulfilled, as the preferred partners can't consent. Thus, giving them the "next best thing" would be something good. After all, paedophiles aren't the problem, child molesters are. And there's a pretty big difference between them.

I don't like these drawings, but they're harming no one, and as long as that's the case, well, if anyone finds a a use case for them, that's their thing. But you certainly cannot excuse any abuse of actual children with "but the pictures showed it's normal", that is for sure. Just in case someone thinks I want to defend child molesters...
 

Izayoi

Banned
This. Theyll just sexualize characters who look like theyre elementary schoolers but claim to be in their 20s or something. Im all for free speech but fuck all this loli pedo shit.
"I'm all for free a speech, but fuck free speech that disgusts me personally."

Keep fighting the good fight.

& with these new law, it will put both of those type of fuckers in prison!
Yeah, throwing harmless people who have done nothing wrong other than being born a certain way in jail sounds like a fantastic idea.

But why facilitate the normalisation of such a sexual deviancy?
As opposed to doing what, repressing sexual desires so that they may actually build up and become harmful at some later point in time?
 
Google Saaya Irie. She is a japanese bikini model. Then look at the date, and feel confused.

It's kinda stupid that it's always frowned down upon to be attracted to 14-17 years olds. I mean really, some 15 year olds ones look like their almost 20, while some adults still look like teenagers. How some view that as "child" pornography is heresy. I only feel digusted if the "minor" mentioned is under 14.
 
It's kinda stupid that it's always frowned down upon to be attracted to 14-17 years olds. I mean really, some 15 year olds ones look like their almost 20, while some adults still look like teenagers. How some view that as "child" pornography is heresy. I only feel digusted if the "minor" mentioned is under 14.

Seriously? Seriously? 15 year old who looks 20 is still 15, still has the mindset of a 9th grader, is very young minded and easily manipulated. When's the last time you met an 8th grader, heard them speak and said "yeah, that's a mature adult who is emotionally, mentally and socially developed enough to make sexual decisions without being used or being caught at the losing end of a misuse of trust and power."?

Most 14 year olds are hella awkward and barely out of their training bras, despite what the "lolita" media tropes would have you believe.
 
Glad Japan is taking steps to ban this.

Liking that crap is weird and if you like it this makes you a socially awkward individual who should seek help.
 
Seriously? Seriously? 15 year old who looks 20 is still 15, still has the mindset of a 9th grader, is very young minded and easily manipulated. When's the last time you met an 8th grader, heard them speak and said "yeah, that's a mature adult who is emotionally, mentally and socially developed enough to make sexual decisions without being used or being caught at the losing end of a misuse of trust and power."?

Most 14 year olds are hella awkward and barely out of their training bras, despite what the "lolita" media tropes would have you believe.

Well, I just meant physical attraction. I don't agree with the notion that that someone that much older should be with someone 14 or 15. At 16 however, the age gap can be lessened I think. And many in their 20's aren't "socially and mentally developed" enough either...like physical appearance, mental matureness varies heavily between 15-21.
 

Tacitus_

Member
It's kinda stupid that it's always frowned down upon to be attracted to 14-17 years olds. I mean really, some 15 year olds ones look like their almost 20, while some adults still look like teenagers. How some view that as "child" pornography is heresy. I only feel digusted if the "minor" mentioned is under 14.

I think she was 11 or 12 at that photoshoot though. Like that one image macro says "we're all pedophiles now".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom