• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Japan's ruling party to reintroduce child pornography law revision

Status
Not open for further replies.

Risette

A Good Citizen
Probably because law makers like ambiguation where they can stretch the power of legislation to their will at a later time on a case by case basis.



You completely missed what ever I was saying, or I poorly said it. I'm talking about the continuum of anime for wholesome down to smutty and into loli territory. About the boundary of what is artistic and ok, and what would be considered simulated cp.

Of course that is victimless, but you do realize that the legislation deals with the real thing too. It's not all victimless, just the virtual side is, which is what I was specifically talking about when mentioning the boundaries. Because in Japan it is vague as to what form of ero material would end up illegal under this legislation.
Maybe legislation to protect real children would pass easier if some politicians didn't intentionally create a grey area that could lead to censorship of art?
 

injurai

Banned
Maybe legislation to protect real children would pass easier if some politicians didn't intentionally create a grey area that could lead to censorship of art?

I'm all for smaller less bloated legislation. But they tack these on to try and pass something that is divided or unpopular with something has to happen. and In this instance I would budge on the side of creative liberty to allow for some human decency and protection.
 
Probably because law makers like ambiguation where they can stretch the power of legislation to their will at a later time on a case by case basis.



You completely missed what ever I was saying, or I poorly said it. I'm talking about the continuum of anime for wholesome down to smutty and into loli territory. About the boundary of what is artistic and ok, and what would be considered simulated cp.

Of course that is victimless, but you do realize that the legislation deals with the real thing too. It's not all victimless, just the virtual side is, which is what I was specifically talking about when mentioning the boundaries. Because in Japan it is vague as to what form of ero material would end up illegal under this legislation.

My point has been that outlawing actual child porn while keeping harmless loli/shota stuff should be quite simple. If we have a disagreement outside of that I don't know what it is.

Of course if it were all or nothing I couldn't care less if they banned underage hentai if it meant also banning real child porn. There's just no rational explanation for why they're being grouped together in this instance.
 

Risette

A Good Citizen
I'm all for smaller less bloated legislation. But they tack these one to try and pass something that is divided or unpopular with something has to happen. and In this instance I would budge on the side of creative liberty to allow for some human decency and protection.
I would agree, because the artistic side would fall in a grey area that could be fought in court should they try to enforce that end of it. However, I still think it's worth being concerned about because politicians have tried and failed to outlaw the art before and are obviously now trying to sneak it into legitimate laws.

Politicians are gross. There shouldn't be any need to push political agendas in order to protect real children.
 

ynthrepic

Banned
Personally, I think violent games should be illegal, too. The vast majority of people who play them are probably not going to enact anything they see, but we shouldn't pretend there aren't deviants out there who will.

The only people who are going to enact video games are impressionable children or mentally insane adults. We already have institutions in place to deal with both.
 

duckroll

Member
I'm all for smaller less bloated legislation. But they tack these on to try and pass something that is divided or unpopular with something has to happen. and In this instance I would budge on the side of creative liberty to allow for some human decency and protection.

Have you considered that this might be why possession of child pornography is still legal in Japan? If politicians are more interested in playing legal games than actually putting something into law, and there is a strong enough resistance against bills would could have a strong impact on the entertainment industry due to possible censorship enforcement due to vague terms, then such bills will never pass, even though the main intent of the bill is something everyone agrees needs to happen.
 

sleepykyo

Member
With bills like these, it seems like they're just not really serious about the issue.

Seems like they're pretty serious. Some of the proponents of the bill have previously signed a bill that moves various animes and mangas into the (normally reserved for porn) 18 and over section.

Looking at it from child pornography they aren't serious about it. Looking at if from chilling the anime and manga industry, they're extremely serious about it. As the article noted, one of backing parties expanded the number of anime, manga and video-games that were harmful publications and needed to 18 and over only. Meanwhile, anime and manga makers are opposing it. The restoration party is using the legislation to trojan their agenda in.
 

injurai

Banned
Have you considered that this might be why possession of child pornography is still legal in Japan? If politicians are more interested in playing legal games than actually putting something into law, and there is a strong enough resistance against bills would could have a strong impact on the entertainment industry due to possible censorship enforcement due to vague terms, then such bills will never pass, even though the main intent of the bill is something everyone agrees needs to happen.

It most certainly is a major reason, and its quite detestable to be honest. I wouldn't be surprised if some of the entertainment industries where lobbying against portions related to drawn depictions of youth at the expense of banning cp.
 

daniels

Member
I wonder how some guys here justify buying the next call of duty, GTA5, watch any kind of violent movie or are against banning of violent games and movies for that matter.
Must take some pretty heavy mental gymnastics and hypocrisy.

real life pedophilia = crime
games, drawings of pedophilia = victimless/thought crime = ?now real life crime/banned?

real life violence = crime
games, drawings of violence = victimless/thought crime = ?apparently should now be a real life crime/banned?

I always wondered what the legal punishment for drawings should be lol.. jail time? a fine?
get on the sex offender list in the us? maybe someone can help me out here i don’t get it.
 

sleepykyo

Member
We don't have to look at violent games. We can just look at teen slashers in the US. Various adult females depict: teenage females going to a camp and strip/engage in sex (before Jason kills them).
 

Forceatowulf

G***n S**n*bi
I'm probably one of the most gung ho motherfuckers when it comes to child porn you will ever meet (used to work at a Day Care). I think possession of legit CP should have some crazy harsh punishments. Period.

That being said, I don't see the need to ban anime/cartoon garbage. There is no victim there. Like.. at all. It's an imaginary character in an imaginary scenario. I really don't give much of a shit about that... I want resources, time, and money dedicated to getting rid of real CP and CP rings alike. Wasting those efforts on a bunch of losers spanking it to the power puff girls or whatever the fuck is just meaningless.
 

javac

Member
Too bad he sold it to the devil when making Rebuild. :(

Well the first two were pretty decent! That's coming from a guy who swears by the original 26 episodes too! I still haven't watched my copy of 3.33 yet, been holding it off while dealing with my uni stuff. Will watch tomorrow! It better be good :(

We totally turned this into an Anno thread. Success!
 
ix3AP5afaqAEu.gif

In his defense, she is quite cute.
 

Speevy

Banned
Child pornography and those who consume it can go die in a hole.

I don't really have an opinion on this whole cartoon child porn issue, other than to say it sounds pretty disgusting to me.
 

Regulus Tera

Romanes Eunt Domus
Well the first two were pretty decent! That's coming from a guy who swears by the original 26 episodes too! I still haven't watched my copy of 3.33 yet, been holding it off while dealing with my uni stuff. Will watch tomorrow! It better be good :(

We totally turned this into an Anno thread. Success!
CGI Evangelions are something that should not be tolerated under any circumstance.
 

javac

Member
Yoko is 18...Yoko is 18...Yoko is 18...Yoko is 18...Yoko is 18...Yoko is 18...Yoko is 18...Yoko is 18...

Japan is screwed.

Yeah I thought so but it's always been all over the place but yeah I remember reading the official guide and remember it saying she's 18 at the start of the anime. Huzzah!

If it makes you feel better, Asuka is now canonically
24
.

Double Huzzah!
 

javac

Member
CGI Evangelions are something that should not be tolerated under any circumstance.

Well that much is for sure! The original Eva series looks incredible even today. Even with all the errors and inconsistencies it has a warm human touch to it. It looks far better then then stuff in Rebuild and the designs were far better in the original series but I have enjoyed Rebuild so far for what it is I suppose. If I get anything out of 3.33 it'll be the OST. Good stuff. But I digress.
 
I don't like banning things, but images that glorify having sexual relations with children should be illegal worldwide.


Because statistics are good, does anyone have accurate numbers for sexual crimes againt children in Japan compared to other countries?
 

Mudkips

Banned
Pretend child porn never hurt anyone, but criminalizing possession of it sure will.

Posession of actual child porn should be illegal as long as they don't blindly lock up anyone who is sent a text or email with it or linked to a site that has it.

4chan used to have fun linking people to fed honey pots, for example.
 
It is actually easy to defend loli, if it turns out that it harms nobody. If loli porn leads to less sexual assaults against children then it is actively beneficial to society as an outlet for pedophiles. If loli porn leads to more sexual assaults against real children, then it should be banned.

Even I, someone who LOATHES all types of anime, would have to agree with this.
If the existence and legality of cartoon kiddy porn lowers the number of real life child victims, then I guess its best to have it there.
I feel awful for saying it, but ultimately, the safety of real life kids should be the priority.
 

ugly

Member
Laws like this are driven more by a hatred/disgust of pedophiles than a desire to protect children. There's no evidence to suggested animated child pornography increases sexual violence. If anything, I'd wager it decreases it by providing an outlet for sexual release that doesn't harm anybody.

If someone who is attracted to children is able to look at animated porn to get off and keeps away from actual children, there is no legitimate reason for anyone to have a problem with that.

Yea, I agree with this. Outright banning it will not end well. Look at the drug war - yes, I'm comparing it to the drug war - anytime you try to repress a part of human desire, people will find a way around it, and fighting that with brute force ends ugly. If you can provide an outlet for people to act out their desires in a way that doesn't harm people, i think that's the safest thing. People need to stop treating pedophiles like CRIMINALS BURN WITH FIRE, and more like real people who have a problem. Same with heavy drug users.

If the existence and legality of cartoon kiddy porn lowers the number of real life child victims, then I guess its best to have it there.
I feel awful for saying it, but ultimately, the safety of real life kids should be the priority.

This.
 

Jackben

bitch I'm taking calls.
I'm not surprised these weren't already laws in Japan. It's actually pretty sad. Time to grow up, guys.
 

UrbanRats

Member
How can an issue so simple, be so complicated?

A real person has rights a drawing doesn't.
Japan should get its shit together, outlaw the possession of real CP and be done with it, how hard can it be?
-
I also find it weird that some people think that if you remove drawn loli hentai, somehow pedophiles will stop existing (?).
Things aren't that simple unfortunately, and you can't put your head into the sand and hope shit will stop existing.
You have to actually tackle it, in the most reasonable way.
 
So does this mean the end of lolicon anime?

Totes brah, you just won the internet
award for not reading the thread before posting

How can an issue so simple, be so complicated?

A real person has rights a drawing doesn't.
Japan should get its shit together, outlaw the possession of real CP and be done with it, how hard can it be?
-
I also find it weird that some people think that if you remove drawn loli hentai, somehow pedophiles will stop existing (?).
Things aren't that simple unfortunately, and you can't put your head into the sand and hope shit will stop existing.
You have to actually tackle it, in the most reasonable way.

Honestly the way this has been framed it's almost like the legislators are trying to prevent the important laws from being passed by turning it into a civil rights issue. It's like the rider principle in the US, tack an unpopular rider to a bill which is sure to pass so that you can destroy it.
 

UrbanRats

Member
Honestly the way this has been framed it's almost like the legislators are trying to prevent the important laws from being passed by turning it into a civil rights issue. It's like the rider principle in the US, tack an unpopular rider to a bill which is sure to pass so that you can destroy it.
Well that's absolutely sick.
 

Josh7289

Member
Totes brah, you just won the internet
award for not reading the thread before posting

Yeah, I knew that would happen, but it's a long-ass thread.

Anyway, I don't see any consensus on the matter, or much real discussion from people in the know either. ... Actually that's just because I've heard all these same arguments for and against lolicon productions before.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom