Thank God. For all of the hate reboots get, this is one series that needed it...
To be fair, the reboot into Lara Croft and the Guardian of Light was *awesome*. Not too sure it needed another.
Thank God. For all of the hate reboots get, this is one series that needed it...
Sitting back exhausted we were left with just one question dribbling forth from our gaping jaws. How on earth are they going to top this in the sequel? Because of one thing there can be no doubt. Lara is back.
I think I made a bet somewhere some months ago that this game will have a metacritic of 85 or higher; that's because one can predict where a "AAA" game will land on the metacritic up to 2-3 years in advance with a huge percentage of accuracy. Reviews are not critical assessments of games anymore. They're generally paid advertisements.
Do you think over the top negativity at every whim adds a sense of mystique and credibility?
Just wondering, since being overtly negative appears to be your modus operandi.
Fair enough, but when you use the name of a longstanding series, people are going to come to new titles with certain expectations.A combination of climbing in a pseudo sandbox and combat. I won't sit here and judge Tomb Raider and how it compares to the other games in the series. I would rather judge it as a game and leave behind and preconceived notions of what the game is supposed to be like.
Let's predict review scores
GI - 9.5/10
IGN - 9.0/10
Gamespot - 8.5/10
GameTrailers -11.4/10
So their is more cut scenes, that it? How dare they try to weave a cohesive narrative. If you don't like the cut scenes, then skip them and enjoy the game.
Getting angry because a bland mediocre series gets rebooted to something that might be better is just silly.
IGN is all over this one. Casey Lynch can't shut up about how amazing it is and all the extra previews they've been getting
I'm thinking 9.7ish.
Shacknews is going to be low if their Weekend Confirmed anecdotes are anything to go by.
7-8ish.
Dead Space 3 got pretty accurate scores from some reviewers and is sitting at a 78 on metacritic. Maybe videogame reviewers and publications are wising up.
Why should they get the benefit of the doubt considering their past Tomb Raider games? This game looks like everything fans didn't like about CD's Tomb Raider games distilled into its purist form.Meh, the hate this game gets is the same that RE4 got for changing its formula. It worked for RE4 and I'll give CD the benefit of the doubt that they know what they're doing.
Ok, how exactly does this help your argument again?
Your argument is the new Tomb Raider is not a "actual tomb raider game "
Your support for this argument is
So you admit that the old games are not subtle and nuanced so why is it a huge deal now that the reboot doesn't either?
So their is more cut scenes, that it? How dare they try to weave a cohesive narrative. If you don't like the cut scenes, then skip them and enjoy the game. You can play most modern games without watching the cut scenes anyways.
Getting angry because a bland mediocre series gets rebooted to something that might be better is just silly.
Pretty excited for this game and I am happy with the direction of the reboot. I haven't played the last few Tomb Raiders but to me tomb raider is that game where you fight a large hell fetus and a kid riding a skateboard with uzis which was awesome when I was 7 but not really interesting to me now.
You make it seem like I'm trying to be a magician or something. My ability to see bad games ahead of time is anything but magic, it's just good old fashioned research.
Yeah man how dare i want my Tomb Raider game play like a Tomb Raider!!!What insolence!!!
You do realize they designed this game based on their shitty story right?QTE's,scripted events are all there to force the player down a narrative quick thrill ride.The developers have actually confirmed that in many cases Lara will not be able to run,not even fall from ledges just for the sake of their stupid story.
Ok now that you showed your true colors it's obvious you don't give a fuck about this series,so please go play your dudebro shooter and spare us your trolling about a game you obviously don't have the slightest idea of what is about.
Not to mention you do have your moments of positivity. Look at the PS4 conference as a recent reference. Killzone is one of the last games I'd figure you'd give praise for, but you put aside the linearity and narrative quality aside when it came to what GG accomplished at least visually in that demo.
Still don't agree with some of your views or how you go about expressing them, but understanding where you're coming from brings out a level of respect.
Game journalism isn't very good, I give you that, but the cynical attitudes of many gamers are much more annoying. The reactions in these review threads are always the same:
- Is it a game gamers are looking forward to and have high hopes for?
-> Great scores are going to be celebrated, reviewers who rate low only want to generate clicks.
- Is it a game gamers are skeptical about?
-> Low scores are being celebrated, high scores are dismissed as being paid for.
Really, it's like reviews are only means to confirm your own bias nowadays.
Of course, it aren't always the same people who complain, but it's still something that makes these threads hard to read.
Some people here are like broken records, really...
I'm excited for this!
I don't mind the people criticizing killzone for looking like it plays the same way as all FPS, that's fair and understandable. I was just going against the people saying it didn't look any better, or looked like a top shelf PS3 game which I felt was total BS. I do wish we'd get to explore and fly around that beautiful city just as much as anyone would though.
IGN is all over this one. Casey Lynch can't shut up about how amazing it is and all the extra previews they've been getting
I'm thinking 9.7ish.
Shacknews is going to be low if their Weekend Confirmed anecdotes are anything to go by.
7-8ish.
Am I really looking at the cover of a game magazine basing its marketing and PR over "unbiased reviews"? REALLY?
Am I really looking at the cover of a game magazine basing its marketing and PR over "unbiased reviews"? REALLY?
Maybe you should actually read the full review before doing pretty much the same thing you're criticising it for and judging it groundlessly.
Reboot. ✔
RPG elements such as collecting and linear semi planned skill unlocks. ✔
"A character that actually feels something" ✔
Characters feelings or personality don't match what you do gameplay wise. ✔
Bow and arrow usage even though you have a fully automatic assault rifle. ✔
Forced multiplayer built around mechanics that feel clunky. ✔
An actual Tomb Raider game. X
In MANY cases? LOL! You're twisting words around to fit your blind hate. They certainly did not say that it's gonna happen in many cases and from what I've seen it only happens in small sections where you wouldn't have any reason to run or fall off a ledge. Sure, it might be stupid. But it won't actually affect the gameplay.
The TR series has pretty much been dead for years.And I'm saying this as a huge TR fan. None of the games released by Crystal Dynamics have been true TR games (Legend: fun but extremely generic and easy, no challenging platforming or exploration whatsoever | Anniversary: an insult to the original. Boring, grey visuals, zero atmosphere, boring gameplay with endless, super-easy magnetic ledge-hopping instead of proper platforming. | Underworld: worst "TR" game ever. boring, linear gameplay with the same magnetic ledges from Legend and Underworld, uninspired visuals, atrocious story). Guardian of Light was fun but it wasn't and was never supposed to be a proper Tomb Raider game.
After the likes of Anniversary and Underworld I'm just glad we seem to finally be getting a Tomb Raider game that is fun again.
Sure, maybe it has too much combat.
But the platforming actually looks more like platforming again instead of ledge-hopping
and the hubs and side tombs actually give you opportunities to explore.
No, this won't be a Tomb Raider game like the classics. But wake up! We haven't had one like those since Eidos took the franchise away from Core Design in 2003.
We'll never get one like that again (apart from fanmade level editor games).
I think he did.
The Xbox version of the game just leaked online, so I'd expect tons of videos and impressions over the next few days.
Sounds good! ME3 ws a great game.I'm expecting Tomb Raider to be this year's Mass Effect 3, with the difference in opinion between the reviewers and people who actually played the game being massive and the reviews being highly inaccurate and making us question if the reviewers even played the game.
The "Unbiased reviews!" on the cover seals the deal.This is a perfect example of why game reviewers are so incredibly mind-numbing to read. It's basically fan-boy/-girl drivel filled with an extreme use of hyperbolic language through an incredible use of superlatives. There's no analysis, no critical thinking, no thorough evaluation of the game, and so on - it's like reading a teenager's high school essay of that one time where he/she ate a good cake.
Fuckgame reviewers and their lack of thinking.most
Sounds good! ME3 ws a great game.