Cornballer
Member
- Sepinwall Interview: 'Masters of Sex' star Lizzy Caplan on nudity, the 1950s and typecasting
- Onion A|V Club review *some minor spoilers*
"Masters of Sex" is the best new show of the fall by a very long stretch. It's also a refreshing anomaly: a prestige cable drama that doesn't feel like a recombination of elements from 15 shows that came before it. It's not another Bastard Son of Tony Soprano like "Ray Donovan" and "Low Winter Sun," and even though it begins in the late 1950s, the only resemblance to "Mad Men" involves the clothes and the quality.
Masters of Sex is nuanced, intelligently acted, and swellegantly directed, and I highly recommend it. I’ve seen six episodes; the third really kicks the show into a higher gear (or, to use the sex researchers’ term of art, “the plateau phase”. So if you’re skeptical, stick it out at least that long.
The tension between Masters and Johnson is classic stuff hes the brains, shes the heart, opposites attract and all that. But shes the brains, as well; and even though hes in the power position, hes also a tangle of neuroses and personal problems.
Grade: B+
Lizzy Caplan said:I'm getting naked
- NYT Review: Late Nights? Please, Dear, It's ScienceLike all great TV, Masters is most interested in what drives its characters - in who they are and might yet be - and it draws that picture in ways that make you laugh one moment and cringe in empathy the next. A few plotlines look rocky, and a few lines of dialogue stumble, but based on the first six episodes, we're being introduced to a show that can enlighten, entertain and contend for Emmys, all in the same breath.
- NPR: 'Masters Of Sex' Get Unmasterful Treatment On ShowtimeLike sex, Masters of Sex gets better as it goes on. But without an extra dimension, or a broader glimpse of a world beyond St. Louis, the series eventually grows a little claustrophobic and thin. Yet the series is not without a sense of humor, especially about the ignorance of men who think they know everything about women and never thought to ask.
But Masters of Sex is missing Mad Men's ruthless clarity and sense of detail. Michelle Ashford, appears worried lest her show seem too serious, too grown-up, too unlikable. Clumsily juggling tones, she interlaces genuinely powerful scenes with silliness and cliches.
- LA Times: McNamara's Weekend PicksDescribing Showtime's period drama Masters of Sex (Sunday, 10/9c) as the fall's most stimulating and satisfying new series sounds like a double entendre, but that's what you get when the kinky and the clinical so provocatively collide. There is no more fascinating, or entertaining, new series this fall season.
- Slate: The Joy of Watching SexSheen is a chameleon, though the repressed scientist doesn't sit quite comfortably on him -- we keep waiting for the grin we know is lurking in their somewhere. Caplan, on the other hand, is a marvel, creating a dishy, dignified and a thoroughly modern woman who winds up helping millions to become something similar.
Masters of Sex is the best new show of the fall season
Damn, she's such a cool person.
- Newsday:The performances, nurtured by such A-list directors as Michael Apted and John Madden, are extraordinary. There isn't a clinker in the bunch.
- Boston Globe:Humor is also key in the capacious pilot hour directed by John Madden ("Shakespeare in Love"). Subsequent episodes echo its deft balance of epic scope and whimsical humanity.
Its an inviting, beautifully acted, and smartly written period drama set in the 1950s
"Masters'" deep, sincere desire to illuminate the mental and physical barriers that keep people from being happy -- and from being themselves -- is laudable. The series gains strength and dramatic momentum as it progresses, finding individual and idiosyncratic ways to tell stories of self-denial, awakening and discovery. Through it all, Sheen and Caplan do a fantastic job of conveying the burning curiosity and sense of discovery that drove Masters and Johnson.
Huh. I didn't even know about that.
SPOILERS
In the pilot Masters' wife's infertility is a big part of the story, and she becomes friends with Virginia. I'm talking about the fact that he eventually divorces his wife and marries Virginia.
Sex is far more prevalent in American life than violence, though you wouldn't know it from our entertainment. Audiences cheer when heads explode in geysers of vermilion, but filmmakers themselves blush and titter when it's time to depict the ordinary things that happen between the sheets. Masters of Sex isn't a great show yet though the potential is certainly there for it to grow into one but it feels like an important one. It's a series about adults consenting adults that doesn't need to censor its ambition with faux-somberness or genre puffery. And if you, like me, care about the future of TV and the types of stories it's willing to tell, that alone should be a giant turn-on.
Each character is afforded a rich psychology, and the cast is more than up to the task of bringing these fascinating, nuanced creatures to life. Masters of Sex reflects just as much about the time it takes place in as it does our world, today. I do recommend you stick with the first several episode as they only get better.
A smart new Showtime series about sex researchers William H. Masters and Virginia Johnson examines inherently eye-popping subject matter without exploiting it.
Good to see the continued praise for this. It's the thing I'm the second most excited to watch this Sunday after a certain series finale of course.
I hope Lizzy Caplan doesn't get naked a lot in this. It seems like a great show and I'd want to watch it but I think I'd have an aneurysm if I saw her naked a lot. I couldn't handle it.
The pilot is up on youtube, so why not watch it now?I'm gonna watch it tomorrow.
I hope Lizzy Caplan doesn't get naked a lot in this. It seems like a great show and I'd want to watch it but I think I'd have an aneurysm if I saw her naked a lot. I couldn't handle it.
Wait, what?
I hope I never get to the point where I'm complaining about super hot people of the gender I'm primarily attracted to getting naked.
MASTERS OF SEX stars Michael Sheen and Lizzy Caplan as real-life pioneers of the science of human sexuality, William Masters and Virginia Johnson. Their research touched off the sexual revolution and took them from a midwestern teaching hospital to the cover of Time magazine and multiple appearances on Johnny Carson's couch. He is a brilliant scientist out of touch with his own feelings, and she is a single working mother ahead of her time. The series chronicles their unusual lives, romance, and unlikely pop culture trajectory.
Wait, what?
I hope I never get to the point where I'm complaining about super hot people of the gender I'm primarily attracted to getting naked.
What does "trajectory" mean?
Sorry, i'm mind numblingly dumb.
The show sounds really cool though!!
As well as recording some of the first physiological data from the human body and sex organs during sexual excitation, they also framed their findings and conclusions in language that espoused sex as a healthy and natural activity that could be enjoyed as a source of pleasure and intimacy.
The era in which their research was conducted permitted the use of methods that have not been attempted before or since: "[M]en and women were designated as 'assigned partners' and arbitrarily paired with each other to create 'assigned couples'."[8]
Eh, I just prefer to wait and watch things on TV. I'm going to watch Homeland, this, and Breaking Bad on Sunday. I'll save the two hours of HBO stuff for another day.
Man, just about everyone from Mean Girls ended up better off than Lohan.
Note that the premiere is already available on youtube, Showtimes's website, and on demand. Check the OP for more details.Pilot
Dr. William Masters runs a successful medical practice and conducts a secret study of human sexuality; a former nightclub singer proves to be an asset to Masters' work.