AlphaDragoon
Member
Lance Bone Path said:Please. If you haven't played it, you should just let people who have played it speak for themselves.
Anything that's dumbed down was dumbed down by Tri first. Tri is not that hard and the game is not about being hard- it's about playing with other people. Much of the difficulty came from various things being broken like hitboxes. If Tri feels harder, it's probably because of the various measures to make it a joyless grind for equipment or hunter rank.
Swimming/underwater is not universally loved. I think fighting underwater is crap and removing it makes the game better because a lot of weapon types return in exchange.
Tri's online is no better than ad hoc party and is worse in many respects.
Ad hoc party supports 8 person rooms, mics (i.e. voice chat), allows the owner of a room to kick out unwanted guests, allows the owner to modify room descriptions whenever, and you can still use regular psn messaging and receive notices that friends are online.
I'm hearing a lot of your own opinion in there. You think Tri is not that hard. You think underwater is bad. You think, you think. You may like it better but there's quite a few (including someone who posted a few lines before me) who believe Tri to be the better game.
And I'm basing what I'm saying off what several folks on this very website have had to say about the two, not just a single opinion or my own speculation on the game. A lot of people have said that Portable 3rd is easier than Tri to the point where collecting gear is somewhat unnecessary (such as being able to wear Jaggi armor and get by 80% of the game just fine). There are also people who liked the underwater sections just fine and feel it to be a downgrade to remove it instead of refining it, which I agree with.
While I agree that removing weapon types was bad form, I also think that they could add them and keep underwater fighting if they really wanted to.