There legal counsel never said anything about him taking funds, it was his own counsel that stated that he was out of the country and they also confirmed that he had removed the hard drive controllers. The assumption that he misappropriated funds is because he took up a collection, my guess is that he didn't take any money, he just used his own money for a vacation rather than adding it to his defense fund. Not as egregious but still a dick move.ShockingAlberto said:For whatever it's worth, I naturally assume legal counsel for a corporate entity will fight viciously for their client and will do whatever they can to paint the opposition in a bad light. That's what they do. Believing them wholesale speaks to such a level of sycophancy that I struggle to even put it in to words.
That said, if he took the donations and used them for things other than what he claimed, that is very illegal.
Does anyone actually have evidence he misappropriated donations or are people assuming that because he asked for donations, then went on vacation?
Dreams-Visions said:this thread is now hilarious.
Inb4 Geohot gets sued by Kaiba Corporation.Speevy said:I just received word that George Hotz has hacked the pyramids in Egypt. Don't ask me how, but expect a custom firmware in the coming weeks.
ha1f said:Absolutely, as long as he doesn't use any of the money donated to him to go on the vacation.
A lot of people who support geohot don't think this kid should have been sued in the first place. I'm sure they're more than happy to come out of pocket to cancel out his legal fees.
MrPliskin said:It means he either had enough money to go on a vacation, or he used donated funds to take a vacation.
MrPliskin said:Do you? Because as far as I'm concerned we've both done the exact same thing. The only major difference is that I'm standing on the side of what a logical adult would do, not what a spiteful arrogant child (age is irrelevant at this point) would do.
TheHeretic said:When did he claim he had no money? He statement was that he had $10,000 in legal bills and was asking for assistance in paying them.
Speevy said:He has traveled to Sony's manufacturing plant, to hack consoles at the source.
It's the only way.
Gaz Pwnage said:No, it does not
??Gaz Pwnage said:No, it does not
Wallach said:Wouldn't he be fucking with the judge that ordered him to provide the hard drive to be copied by the neutral party? Seems like a bad idea.
jling84 said:Because if you have $10,000 in legal bills, you should be "assisting" yourself with this wad of money you have set aside for a vacation before asking people to assist you. If we are to believe him that he needed assistance, we can only assume that he's already drained all funds other than those needed for the bare necessities. A vacation to South America is not a bare necessity.
They have to... ask him to show up for depositions? Yes, I guess they do have to do that...Wazzim said:Poor Sony, is this what they have to do to win this useless case? For what we know, the guy is just on a short holiday to take a break from hacking.
Wazzim said:Poor Sony, is this what they have to do to win this useless case? For what we know, the guy is just on a short holiday to take a break from hacking.
TheExodu5 said:
jling84 said:Because if you have $10,000 in legal bills, you should be "assisting" yourself with this wad of money you have set aside for a vacation before asking people to assist you. If we are to believe him that he needed assistance, we can only assume that he's already drained all funds other than those needed for the bare necessities. A vacation to South America is not a bare necessity.
ShockingAlberto said:Do you have the request for evidence order handy? I'd love to give it a read.
Mr. Hotz was ordered to provide his hard drives and storage devices on which any circumvention devices were stored-- nothing more.
http://www.groklaw.net/pdf2/SonyvHotz-104-19.pdfYour client has not provided a hard drive but rather parts of the hard drive. A hard drive must contain all the parts that make it a working device which include the enclosure, platters, heads and attached controller card. This controller card is installed at the factory and not normally removed or handled by an end user.
Gaz Pwnage said:He could of won that trip to SA for all we know
In light of Hotzs failure to comply with his discovery obligations and the still outstanding third party jurisdictional discovery, SCEA proposed a two-week extension of all briefing and hearing deadlines relating to Hotzs Motion to Dismiss. Bricker Decl., ¶5, Exh. D. Hotz refused, stating that SCEA would have its discovery by the time of the hearing. Id. He completely ignored the fact that SCEAs opposition deadline was approaching. Hotz also rejected outright SCEAs second attempt to arrange for an inspection of his PS3 Systems and tried to evade his court-ordered deposition, stating that it was unnecessary. Id.
Despite Judge Speros orders, Hotz continues to frustrate all attempts to complete jurisdictional discovery. In yet another attempt to avoid his deposition and a limited inspection of his impounded hard drives, on March 17, 2011, Hotz filed a motion for protective order on issues already decided by Judge Spero. (Docket No. 100.) On the same day, TIG discovered that prior to delivery, Hotz had removed integral components from his impounded hard drives, rendering them completely non-functional. Bricker Decl., ¶21, Exh. S. When SCEA echoed TIGs request that the components of the hard drives be delivered immediately, Hotzs counsel responded that Hotz was in South America.Id
Gaz Pwnage said:No, it does not
phosphor112 said:Before this thread starts to die off, I wonder why people hate Sony so much, when they are just protecting their product... You buy the hardware, not the design, not the firmware. You buy games on the other hand, you don't own any part of it. So why not sue the guys that actually are "renting" games out to you? Sony isn't doing that... well not as much as other companies.
Gaz Pwnage said:He could of won that trip to SA for all we know
Mama Robotnik said:Guys, I commented on this development before you all did.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=26663220&postcount=4072
Just got back in and will address further posts in a moment, but please don't say I'm avoiding the discussions when its a lie. We're better than that.
No it would be tampering with evidence in the same way as taking a bunch of documents and cutting them into small pieces would be. The information is still there.ShockingAlberto said:The evidence is the data, not the physical harddrive.
It would be tampering with evidence in the same way that, if you had to supply a briefcase full of papers to the DA, but did not give them the key combination to open the lock. They'd have to spend an extra step opening the lock.
Yeah, he's fucking with Sony. That's kind of childish. It's not evidence tampering.
lifa-cobex said:If true, at least Sony won't be wasting any more cash and time on him.
unless they put a contract out for his head lol
lol at you for not being up to date. LOL.nib95 said:Lol at the people who donated money! Bwhahaha!
hyp said:
MrPliskin said:Did you stop reading there? Clearly I present another option that he could have pre-booked everything for the trip well in advance. However, even in that scenario, you cannot pre-book food, and other miscellaneous expenses. He is still spending money, despite pleading for it.
It is in poor form to go on a vacation where you will spend money (more than you would normally) after asking people to donate their hard earned money for your cause (in this case, it's simply his own ass, not any moral cause).
TheChillyAcademic said:No one is saying you support his actions, you've made it clear that you're on the side of the rights violations more so than the "attack" on Geo. Still, surprised you haven't posted much in this thread.
poppabk said:No it would be tampering with evidence in the same way as taking a bunch of documents and cutting them into small pieces would be. The information is still there.
I really don't see how people potentially being scammed is a laughing matter.nib95 said:Lol at the people who donated money! Bwhahaha!
Curufinwe said:I recommend people read pages 22-23 of Sony's motion. Their description of the lengths geohot has gone to to frutstrate the court-ordered discovery is pretty interesting.
http://docs.justia.com/cases/federa...ifornia/candce/3:2011cv00167/235965/103/0.pdf
In light of Hotzs failure to comply with his discovery obligations and the still outstanding third party jurisdictional discovery, SCEA proposed a two-week extension of all briefing and hearing deadlines relating to Hotzs Motion to Dismiss. Bricker Decl., ¶5, Exh. D. Hotz refused, stating that SCEA would have its discovery by the time of the hearing. Id. He completely ignored the fact that SCEAs opposition deadline was approaching. Hotz also rejected outright SCEAs second attempt to arrange for an inspection of his PS3 Systems and tried to evade his court-ordered deposition, stating that it was unnecessary. Id.
Despite Judge Speros orders, Hotz continues to frustrate all attempts to complete jurisdictional discovery. In yet another attempt to avoid his deposition and a limited inspection of his impounded hard drives, on March 17, 2011, Hotz filed a motion for protective order on issues already decided by Judge Spero. (Docket No. 100.) On the same day, TIG discovered that prior to delivery, Hotz had removed integral components from his impounded hard drives, rendering them completely non-functional. Bricker Decl., ¶21, Exh. S. When SCEA echoed TIGs request that the components of the hard drives be delivered immediately, Hotzs counsel responded that Hotz was in South America.Id
poppabk said:No it would be tampering with evidence in the same way as taking a bunch of documents and cutting them into small pieces would be. The information is still there.
MrPliskin said:Did you stop reading there? Clearly I present another option that he could have pre-booked everything for the trip well in advance. However, even in that scenario, you cannot pre-book food, and other miscellaneous expenses. He is still spending money, despite pleading for it.
It is in poor form to go on a vacation where you will spend money (more than you would normally) after asking people to donate their hard earned money for your cause (in this case, it's simply his own ass, not any moral cause).
RedNumberFive said:Maybe I'm crazy, but I seem to think that most lawyers would recommend that you hand over the bare minimum of information in legal proceedings.
darkwing said:TIG is the third party data recovery company?
Arpharmd B said:I support his actions wholeheartedly.
With regard to the scope of the inspection, SCEA, through its technical experts, intends to:
..
(4) Connect to the PlayStation Network (by creating a new user account) using each PS3 console identified by Mr. Hotz