Arpharmd B said:I support his actions wholeheartedly.
RustyNails said:Eh? I've been following Zoe's comments since the start of this whole thing and they're pretty non-fanboyish and non-inflammatory. I'm surprised.
nib95 said:Erm, that would still be considered tampering with evidence lol. if you're innocent and have nothing to hide there's really no reason to do such a thing.
IchigoSharingan said:If he used the donation money, it is poor form. If he used his own personal funds, it is not.
Nairume said:Isn't is likely that his family had planned and saved up for the trip independently of his court costs and have just taken him along for whatever reason?
But, nope! He used his money given to him to fight dear Lord Sony-sama and so he is ever more the villain.
TOAO_Cyrus said:There are degrees to things, Sony just has to spend a hundred bucks or so on an identical drive and swap out the components.
PSGames said:How do we know this trip isn't business related?
gundamkyoukai said:Sony has nothing do with drives , a third party is looking at them .
PSGames said:How do we know this trip isn't business related?
Because it is easier to jump to conclusions when you treat a corporation as one would treat a football team.PSGames said:How do we know this trip isn't business related?
railGUN said:So he didn't actually "flee" - and there is not a single shred of evidence he spent a dime of legal fee donation money on this trip... and yet this thread is about him fleeing and spending donation money on this trip.
Nairume said:I really don't see how people potentially being scammed is a laughing matter.
Curufinwe said:I recommend people read pages 22-23 of Sony's motion. Their description of the lengths geohot has gone to to frutstrate the court-ordered discovery is pretty interesting.
http://docs.justia.com/cases/federa...ifornia/candce/3:2011cv00167/235965/103/0.pdf
TOAO_Cyrus said:Well I'm sure they are charging Sony for all the expenses.
In this case, it's very funny.Nairume said:I really don't see how people potentially being scammed is a laughing matter.
Curufinwe said:Sony were only made aware that he had left the country when the third party vendor complained that geohot had altered the hard drives he gave them, rendering them unusable.
Bwahaha!ViolentP said:I think it's already been confirmed that he won the trip on The Price Is Right.
Performance art.chubigans said:Bwahaha.
Business related huh. What does he do for a living anyways?
PSGames said:The HDDs were missing an easily obtainable component. I would hardly call that "unusable".
PSGames said:The HDDs were missing an easily obtainable component. I would hardly call that "unusable".
From: Michael Grennier [redacted email address]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 7:56 AM
To: Stewart Kellar; Gaudreau, Holly
Cc: Robert Kleeger; Yasha Heidari; Boroumand Smith, Mehrnaz; Bricker, Ryan; Jack C. Praetzellis;
[redacted email address][redacted email address]
Subject: Imaging of encrypted drives. CRM:0003005
All,
We took the drives out of our evidence locker and the evidence bag to image them in their current encrypted state
as stated in the order and agreed to on our phone call yesterday. We have determined that the controller cards
which are screwed onto the hard drives were removed prior to them being given to us. Therefore we are unable
to operate the hard drives in their current state. Keep in mind that we need two days to image these drives as we
have to image two 1TB drives.
I would recommend that Mr. Hotz forward to us immediately both the hard drive controller cards, screws and
anything else he may have including the complete computer system (minus the monitor, keyboard and mouse) so
that we can be prepared to complete the forensic imaging process (both encrypted and un-encrypted).
The drives have been returned to the evidence bag and locker at this time.
Regards,
Mike
Michael Grennier, CFCE, EnCE
TheIntelligenceGroup
out0v0rder said:i gave him $300 dollars. Hope you are ok man.
ShockingAlberto said:Is that evidence or just a conclusion that's being drawn from the sequence of events?
I'm not a legal expert, but how much further will this "frustration" has to go before it turns into contempt of court?Curufinwe said:I recommend people read pages 22-23 of Sony's motion. Their description of the lengths geohot has gone to to frutstrate the court-ordered discovery is pretty interesting.
http://docs.justia.com/cases/federa...ifornia/candce/3:2011cv00167/235965/103/0.pdfIn light of Hotzs failure to comply with his discovery obligations and the still outstanding third party jurisdictional discovery, SCEA proposed a two-week extension of all briefing and hearing deadlines relating to Hotzs Motion to Dismiss. Bricker Decl., ¶5, Exh. D. Hotz refused, stating that SCEA would have its discovery by the time of the hearing. Id. He completely ignored the fact that SCEAs opposition deadline was approaching. Hotz also rejected outright SCEAs second attempt to arrange for an inspection of his PS3 Systems and tried to evade his court-ordered deposition, stating that it was unnecessary. Id.
Despite Judge Speros orders, Hotz continues to frustrate all attempts to complete jurisdictional discovery. In yet another attempt to avoid his deposition and a limited inspection of his impounded hard drives, on March 17, 2011, Hotz filed a motion for protective order on issues already decided by Judge Spero. (Docket No. 100.) On the same day, TIG discovered that prior to delivery, Hotz had removed integral components from his impounded hard drives, rendering them completely non-functional. Bricker Decl., ¶21, Exh. S. When SCEA echoed TIGs request that the components of the hard drives be delivered immediately, Hotzs counsel responded that Hotz was in South America.Id
IchigoSharingan said:If he used the donation money, it is poor form. If he used his own personal funds, it is not.
Opal. http://www.cdrinfo.com/sections/news/Details.aspx?NewsId=24744IchigoSharingan said:I can only imagine how manufacturing companies can make every controller card different, by the billions. That is amazing.
Ozzykamikaze said:I don't think that's true at all. You ask for money because you don't have enough of your own funds to pay, not because you don't feel like using your own money for the thing you did that you know is wrong.
nib95 said:Imo it was a silly thing to donate towards in the first place. Someone had potentially done a crime, courts agreed and seized his goods to comb for further evidence, he asks for donations and gets them and now he frustrates the legal process, tampers with evidence and escapes the country (likely with funds). I am slightly empathetic to the people who donated, but then again they've basically just aided a potential criminal so a part of me is less sympathetic.
Took the words right out of my mouthOzzykamikaze said:I don't think that's true at all. You ask for money because you don't have enough of your own funds to pay, not because you don't feel like using your own money for the thing you did that you know is wrong.
Zoe said:And it's not the duty of the third party vendor to be make these previously functioning drives functioning again.
They probably need the originals for legal reasons. They don't want to compromise their position by slapping on replacements.IchigoSharingan said:I can only imagine how manufacturing companies can make every controller card different, by the billions. That is amazing.
Zoe said:I'm interested in his lawyer's response to that. I wonder if they actually understand the implications and will blindly agree to it considering the difficulty they have with PC hardware.
heyf00L said:We don't know whose money paid for the vacation. He's 21. It's probably a family vacation. Maybe his parents wanted to let him get away from all this for a few days.
ViolentP said:I have $10,000 in my bank account right now. Forget about that though, that's for my vacation. What I DO need is for all of you to help me out in paying some legal fees. This here is my pocket. Put money there.
My point is it's all speculation. So we should wait and see.Chacranajxy said:Probably not.
Jobiensis said:I agree, what he did was in violation of the court order. I don't see how people could say it was destroying evidence though.
Tampering with evidence is a serious crime that involves the alteration, destruction, concealment or falsifying of physical evidence.
jcm said:I don't understand the implications. Can you explain please?
And you know this because....Chacranajxy said:Probably not.
Ozzykamikaze said:I don't think that's true at all. You ask for money because you don't have enough of your own funds to pay, not because you don't feel like using your own money for the thing you did that you know is wrong.
Laughing my ass off at each and every one who donated money to this fuckwit.ViolentP said:I have $10,000 in my bank account right now. Forget about that though, that's for my vacation. What I DO need is for all of you to help me out in paying some legal fees. This here is my pocket. Put money there.
Zoe said:They're updating the firmware on all of his consoles. If he won, he'd have to get new sub-3.56 consoles if he wanted to continue his work.