• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Transgender Teen (Male to Female) Wins 3rd Place in Race;Girls' Mothers Mad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tangeroo

Member
I'm not. Both her gender and sex are female.

Unless she had some sort of miraculous chromosome transmutation, this is factually false.

She's absolutely a girl. But she has the XY chromosomes of a man which makes her sex identification male. This has nothing to do with civil rights. We're strictly talking about the scientific definition of the term.
 
Men are naturally stronger than women when it comes to physical strength. Depending on when the hormonal therapy started, it might be unfair for the transgender student to compete with the other female students. If the hormonal therapy started from young age, then I don't think it's an issue. But I might be wrong. It's definitely a grey area and the right thing to do is not very clear.
 

Dr.Acula

Banned
Its not

Haines’ policy states “For the purposes of gender identification for interscholastic activities, the district will consider the gender identity based on the student’s consistent declaration of gender identity, their actions, attitude, dress and mannerisms.”

http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/27734/

"That chatty, bitchy, flop-wristed athlete is certainly a girl!"

Come the fuck on, smh. The "dress" thing gets a pass if there are uniforms and they require boys to wear jackets and girls skirts, but even that's stupid.

edit: I'm reminded of that woman who was attacked for using the woman's restroom because someone was confused by her short hair -that she shaved because she donates hair to cancer patients. We don't need outside council making "judgement calls" based on how people "look" and "act."
 
Not at all. I'm saying it's irrelevant. If you want to start segragating people for different reasons then be my guest but as it is right now they're segregated by sex only, so she's where she's supposed to be.

If they were segregated by sex then she would be running with XY. She's running with XX. But that's really more because the system hasn't wrestled with the questions of transgender and differences of sex/gender.
 

norm9

Member
Men are naturally stronger than women when it comes to physical strength. Depending on when the hormonal therapy started, it might be unfair for the transgender student to compete with the other female students. If the hormonal therapy started from young age, then I don't think it's an issue. But I might be wrong. It's definitely a grey area and the right thing to do is not very clear.

For some it might be unclear, but for myself it's really quite clear. Her biological sex is male so she can't compete against biological females.
 

Alexlf

Member
"That chatty, bitchy, flop-wristed athlete is certainly a girl!"

Come the fuck on, smh. The "dress" thing gets a pass if there are uniforms and they require boys to wear jackets and girls skirts, but even that's stupid.

If not any of those, how would you quantify gender?

EDIT:
And I very much doubt the meaning behind the statement has any relation to the statement you posted there.
 
I cannot fathom how anyone could possibly come to that conclusion.

This is so simple... I don't know why it is so hard to grasp.

Example A:

You are a girl playing soccer, you live in a country that is obsessed with women's soccer, there are leagues all across the country that feature intense tournaments, and high-intensity training camps. To compete in these tournaments means you are competing against the best, all the time. This has been going on for hundreds of years, and women's sports are just as highly respected as men's... resulting in women being taught from birth to compete just like men are.

Example B:

You are a girl playing soccer, you live in a country that thinks women shouldn't play sports and it doesn't support women's leagues or competitiveness at all. Women are taught from birth that they are supposed to be pretty and fragile, not competitive. You play in soccer tournaments and attend a few camps, but there are few girls participating, and a very low level of competition due to lack of support and zero competitive culture.

---

Example A is a mythical country where women are encouraged to compete from birth, and Example B is pretty much every country in the world currently albeit to less of an extreme.

Which country is going to have more skilled female athletes?

Is this really that hard to grasp?

You condesending tone is doing you no favors. Stop acting like your shitty examples are to hard to grasp when the only one that seems to get it is the guy posting. It usually means your usuing poor examples or terrible logic. Even in your hypothetical B. Scenario there will be women that train and compete from birth I would venture to say that the best women golfer in the world has probably trained from a very young age. Even still she is at a disadvantage among other professionals.

I don't feel like going down this path any more. I think you've got some good ideas and we probably agree on more points than not. I will just say I don't think you give modern women athetes enough credit when you say their potential is hinderd because they didn't get enough encouragement. Sometimes someone telling you will fail is a fuel for sucess.
 
SEX is purely based on chromosomes, if you have a Y you are a Male (Sex wise) unless you have XXY

It's nowhere near that simple. What about intersex people? What about cisgender women who are born XY, have kids, live their lives and never find out?

Chromosomes are not as cut and dry as most people seem to believe.
 

neeksleep

Member
If we're looking at the fastest male vs female sprinters, is the gap that large? Would it be large enough to have to make two extra categories for track and field?
 

Complete

Banned
chromosomes are a myth?
I'm sorry but it's exactly how it DOESN'T work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_sex-determination_system

If you have XY chromosomes, your sex is male. If you have XX chromosomes, your sex is male. sex is a biological trait.
Chromosomes aren't the hard-and-fast rule you think they are.

And, not gonna lie, seeing all this gender essentialism bullshit on GAF is really discouraging. I'd really rather not deal with that.
 

Zoe

Member
"That chatty, bitchy, flop-wristed athlete is certainly a girl!"

Come the fuck on, smh. The "dress" thing gets a pass if there are uniforms and they require boys to wear jackets and girls skirts, but even that's stupid.

edit: I'm reminded of that woman who was attacked for using the woman's restroom because someone was confused by her short hair -that she shaved because she donates hair to cancer patients. We don't need outside council making "judgement calls" based on how people "look" and "act."

You're conveniently overlooking the "declaration" part that comes before all of that.
 
It's nowhere near that simple. What about intersex people? What about cisgender women who are born XY, have kids, live their lives and never find out?

Chromosomes are not as cut and dry as most people seem to believe.

What part of them is not cut and dry? They're in your body, whether you know it or not.
 

WaterAstro

Member
I cannot fathom how anyone could possibly come to that conclusion.

This is so simple... I don't know why it is so hard to grasp.

Example A:

You are a girl playing soccer, you live in a country that is obsessed with women's soccer, there are leagues all across the country that feature intense tournaments, and high-intensity training camps. To compete in these tournaments means you are competing against the best, all the time. This has been going on for hundreds of years, and women's sports are just as highly respected as men's... resulting in women being taught from birth to compete just like men are.

Example B:

You are a girl playing soccer, you live in a country that thinks women shouldn't play sports and it doesn't support women's leagues or competitiveness at all. Women are taught from birth that they are supposed to be pretty and fragile, not competitive. You play in soccer tournaments and attend a few camps, but there are few girls participating, and a very low level of competition due to lack of support and zero competitive culture.

---

Example A is a mythical country where women are encouraged to compete from birth, and Example B is pretty much every country in the world currently albeit to less of an extreme.

Which country is going to have more skilled female athletes?

Is this really that hard to grasp?

I dunno... mythical country sounds like North America and some European countries.

I think females are encouraged to play sports a lot in these times.
 

Alexlf

Member
How the person in question identifies. There was a time where women couldn't wear pants, or go outside without makeup on. They aren't acting "manly" when they do that.

If you are implying that a person's gender is an attribute decided entirely by what they claim to be, then it becomes little more than a meaningless title. Under those specifications saying "I identify as the president" is a valid statement that ought to give a person all the benefits and responsibilities of the president lol. Having a definition not based on (EDIT: Or at least in relation to) society's definitions of "male" and "female" makes the concept of gender entirely meaningless in regards to situations like these, which revolve around presumptions(Edit: and the biology) of sex.
 
B

bomb

Unconfirmed Member
LOL Nattaphon lost to two girls that were born girls. What a loser.
 

WaterAstro

Member
If you are implying that a person's gender is an attribute decided entirely by what they claim to be, then it becomes little more than a meaningless title. Under those specifications saying "I identify as the president" is a valid statement that ought to give a person all the benefits and responsibilities of the president lol. Having a definition not based on society's definitions of "male" and "female" makes the concept of gender entirely meaningless in regards to situations like these, which revolve around presumptions of sex.

"The Men's English Football team loses the World Cup... again."

"The Men's English Football team identifies themselves as Women and finally win the (Women's) World Cup!"
 
At birth, sure.



I'm sorry but its exactly how it works.

No, it is not. Sex is determined by chromosomes, gender by brain structure in the context of society.

Male human = has a Y sex chromosome (mostly for SRY)
Female human = does not have a sex chromosome

Man = identifies as a traditional male gender
Woman = identifies as a traditional female gender

A man can be female, and a woman can be male. This is simple scientific fact.
 

cyberheater

PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 Xbone PS4 PS4
It's progressive bullshite

I understand the principles of equality etc. but this is straight up nonsense.
 
Just curious, if Floyd Mayweather or someone started identifying as female, could he go and compete in women's boxing? I mean, wouldn't want to be unfair.

We can do this all day with the hypothetical examples, bottom line is that a line has to be drawn somewhere, the goal should not be to fair to everyone because it's literally impossible. The goal should be to be fair to the most people.
 

Henkka

Banned
Following these discussions is difficult when people seem to be using different definitions of words like sex, gender, male and female.
 
If you are implying that a person's gender is an attribute decided entirely by what they claim to be, then it becomes little more than a meaningless title. Under those specifications saying "I identify as the president" is a valid statement that ought to give a person all the benefits and responsibilities of the president lol. Having a definition not based on (EDIT: Or at least in relation to) society's definitions of "male" and "female" makes the concept of gender entirely meaningless in regards to situations like these, which revolve around presumptions(Edit: and the biology) of sex.

How is what gender a person identifies as meaningless? Can it change? Sure. Doesn't mean it's meaningless. Maybe the problem is your definition of gender isn't correct. It is precisely what someone identifies as. By identifying as a woman, that person is a woman by gender. That is exactly what makes this question of competitive sports so difficult. And like people above me said, is why you are going to exclude some who identify as women in women's sports. If Mayweather became a women, you aren't letting him box women. You can't be fair to everyone and by trying to make it fair to transwomen, you are making it unfair to biological women.
 

Complete

Banned
I'm thinking that it may be that we'll have to set up rules like "at least two years on hormones" or something if we're going to keep these sex/gender divisions.

Otherwise, we'll have to come up with some other system of division based on relative mass and/or performance rather than sex or gender.
No, it is not. Sex is determined by chromosomes, gender by brain structure in the context of society.

Male human = has a Y sex chromosome (mostly for SRY)
Female human = does not have a sex chromosome

Man = identifies as a traditional male gender
Woman = identifies as a traditional female gender

A man can be female, and a woman can be male. This is simple scientific fact.
Chromosomes aren't the hard-and-fast rule you think they are.
 

Alexlf

Member
Following these discussions is difficult when people seem to be using different definitions of words like sex, gender, male and female.

Absolutely. Differing definitions on people's fundamental beliefs seems to be the cause of most debates like these on neogaf.
 

Not the point.

The point is that the same code can be interpreted differently. Following your example, XY tends to imply male and XX tends to imply female but it doesn't always work that way since there are other factors that influence it.

Tends to being overwhelmingly points to aside from an incredibly small number of times in people with mutations. A look on "intersex" wiki shows that

According to Leonard Sax intersex should be "restricted to those conditions in which chromosomal sex is inconsistent with phenotypic sex"...around 0.018%

If your point is that nothing in nature is absolute then yes, I guess you're right
 

neeksleep

Member
The fastest female 200m time of all time isn't in the top 3000 fastest mens times. In fact, it's a full second behind:

http://www.alltime-athletics.com/m_200ok.htm
http://www.alltime-athletics.com/w_200ok.htm

Wow, that's pretty eye-opening. Thank you for the information!
I would have thought that there would be a gap at the top ranks, that there'd at least be some overlap, just through advances in training, nutition, etc. This does indeed make the situation a lot more complex
 

Skii

Member
Not the point.

The point is that the same code can be interpreted differently. Following your example, XY tends to imply male and XX tends to imply female but it doesn't always work that way since there are other factors that influence it.

But those factors are largely very rare or irrelevant in the context of this debate.

Males have genetics that confer physical advantage. That is a fact regardless of which chromosome you think it comes from or how the genetics behind it works. Any male that decides they are female will still have developed all of the genetic advantages in their physiology for physical activity. It will take years for hormones to change muscle structure and even then, this probably won't be very effective because all hormone replacement just isn't as good as hormones synthesised by your own body.
 

Jenov

Member
It's not like we have 100 million misplaced transgendered athletes. There's only a handful of times this has ever been and will ever be an "issue." Tell the parents to suck it up and treat this as a learning moment for their children.

Disenfranchising and denying places to a handful of biological girls for a handful of transgender girls is progress?
 

Alexlf

Member
How is what gender a person identifies as meaningless? Can it change? Sure. Doesn't mean it's meaningless. Maybe the problem is your definition of gender isn't correct. It is precisely what someone identifies as. By identifying as a woman, that person is a woman by gender. That is exactly what makes this question of competitive sports so difficult.

That's exactly what I address in my post though. Having gender simply be a title makes it have absolutely no relevance in situations regarding human biology and societies presumptions about it.
 

Kinyou

Member
I'm thinking that it may be that we'll have to set up rules like "at least two years on hormones" or something if we're going to keep these sex/gender divisions.

Otherwise, we'll have to come up with some other system of division based on relative mass and/or performance rather than sex or gender.
The question would also be when to enforce those rules. It would seem a bit extreme for something like highschool track running. (Then again, cisgender girls could feel discouraged to compete if they feel like they're disadvantaged...)
It's a rare exception and not worth working everyone into a froth.
I expect these instances to increase if our society keeps to become more open and accepting.
 

Dr.Acula

Banned
You're conveniently overlooking the "declaration" part that comes before all of that.

The declaration is one element, it is independent of the district's considerations on other issues of "conduct."

If you are implying that a person's gender is an attribute decided entirely by what they claim to be, then it becomes little more than a meaningless title. Under those specifications saying "I identify as the president" is a valid statement that ought to give a person all the benefits and responsibilities of the president lol. Having a definition not based on (EDIT: Or at least in relation to) society's definitions of "male" and "female" makes the concept of gender entirely meaningless in regards to situations like these, which revolve around presumptions(Edit: and the biology) of sex.

I just mean when I read “For the purposes of gender identification for interscholastic activities, the district will consider the gender identity based on..." I see that as very wishy-washy, turning gender into the district's judgement call should someone protest an athlete's competing.

It means that a person's gender identity is tied up in how the school district feels about that person.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom