• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Transgender Teen (Male to Female) Wins 3rd Place in Race;Girls' Mothers Mad

Status
Not open for further replies.

see5harp

Member
What about the characteristics that were already affected by test in the first place?

They don't completely go away.

If she prepared and trained under the influence of steroids and then pisses clean at the tournament, does it still mean she didn't have an advantage from training on the junk?
 

jabuseika

Member
The blatant unfairness of a trans girl getting third place will destroy american sports!

Why is it so hard to understand that competitive spots in higher tournaments are awarded to top5 or top10's. People are technically right in believing she's taking a slot from someone that worked just as hard to get into that top 5/10.

This forum has some serious problems with trolls that are tolerated just because of their views.
 
Why is it so hard to understand that competitive spots in higher tournaments are awarded to top5 or top10's. People are technically right in believing she's taking a slot from someone that worked just as hard to get into that top 5/10.

This forum has some serious problems with trolls that are tolerated just because of their views.

you're saying she doesn't deserve to compete?
 

Future

Member
dkE2bdr.png

Haha yeah that's needed for most of this thread. Even I commented on this without REALLY knowing what some of these "advantages" are

For track, for instance. Why do men run faster than women? Is it it simply a difference in muscle size? Bone structure? If you reduce testosterone on the male, does he still have these advantages? What, if anything, could be done to the male to remove those advantages?
 
Why is it so hard to understand that competitive spots in higher tournaments are awarded to top5 or top10's. People are technically right in believing she's taking a slot from someone that worked just as hard to get into that top 5/10.

This forum has some serious problems with trolls that are tolerated just because of their views.

But at the end of the day, it's just a flipping game. Impeding progress over entertainment just seems wrong.
 

ElFly

Member
Why is it so hard to understand that competitive spots in higher tournaments are awarded to top5 or top10's. People are technically right in believing she's taking a slot from someone that worked just as hard to get into that top 5/10.

This forum has some serious problems with trolls that are tolerated just because of their views.

So she does not deserve that slot herself?

Why does she not deserve it?
 
Once they have fully transitioned I don't think they would have too much of an advantage

I can't find any information on the age of this teen, nor if she has fully transitioned yet. (I wouldn't expect that to be in an article for privacy reasons) The timing could have given her an advantage unless she fully transitioned years ago.

Edit: however, I am clearly out of my depth on the topic of the effects of HRT, so I'll bow out.
 
Given the severe health (both physical and mental) and social disparities of being trans, i think we can let trans women have their day in sports.
 
Then it is not unfair.

Like...by definition.

Not every athlete that uses PEDs to gain an advantage necessarily rockets to the top of the history books as the GOAT but it's obviously still ruled as unfair for athletes to use them because it still puts them at an advantage over athletes they normally couldn't compete with regardless of how well they do.

In this case, if she's undergoing HRT I don't think there's an issue. But if she's not then it's pretty clearly unfair to whoever placed after her.
 

SwolBro

Banned
this shouldn't be allowed. i'd be upset as well.

Given the severe health (both physical and mental) and social disparities of being trans, i think we can let trans women have their day in sports.

so everyone else's aspirations and dreams be damned? unbelievable.
 
Why would anyone care when its about kids sports? Shouldn't that be about fun?
On the professional level the thing is more complicated because there we have lots of rules in place to keep the competition fair.
We divide athelets according to gender, weight and other factors.
I think the best thing would be an extra category fo transgender people, but there probably aren't enough transgender athelets to do that.
 

entremet

Member
Why would anyone care when its about kids sports? Shouldn't that be about fun?
On the professional level the thing is more complicated because there we have lots of rules in place to keep the competition fair.
We divide athelets according to gender, weight and other factors.
I think the best thing would be an extra category fo transgender people, but there probably aren't enough transgender athelets to do that.

In this case?

Because money is literally involved. Scholarships.
 
I say anyone who ever places 1st should be barred from competing ever again. Is just unfair

How about testosterone injections for everyone. Fuck I don't know.
 
Given the severe health (both physical and mental) and social disparities of being trans, i think we can let trans women have their day in sports.

Yep. It's funny how progressive people can be when it comes to 90% of life, but mess with traditional sports and the pitchforks come out.
 

ElFly

Member
Not every athlete that uses PEDs to gain an advantage necessarily rockets to the top of the history books as the GOAT but it's obviously still ruled as unfair for athletes to use them because it still puts them at an advantage over athletes they normally couldn't compete with regardless of how well they do.

In this case, if she's undergoing HRT I don't think there's an issue. But if she's not then it's pretty clearly unfair to whoever placed after her.

She's been competing -as a girl- for a year; I reaaaally doubt she has not been in treatment for at least that long.

PED argument is not bad but it is also moot; at the end of the day, trans people have the same right to compete, period.
 

jabuseika

Member
you're saying she doesn't deserve to compete?

No I didn't say that.

Read what I said.

I do think it's unfair if she's not under any kind of hormone therapy to offset the advantages she already possesses naturally. No one's confirmed yet if she's on hormone therapy or not.
 
this shouldn't be allowed. i'd be upset as well.



so everyone else's aspirations and dreams be damned? unbelievable.

Given how rare this situation is, I think we can just take the easy if suboptimal (if that even exists) approach.

Yep. It's funny how progressive people can be when it comes to 90% of life, but mess with traditional sports and the pitchforks come out.

Well it brings up an important issue of what is the point of sports? Better genes + better upbringing is the name of the game, even being able to focus and dedicate time on practice is something heavily influenced by genes.
 

Justified

Member
She finished fifth and third? There's certainly a debate to be had about whether transitioned girls have physical advantages, but in this case at least, it doesn't seem to have made a significant difference, at least not one where she was able to win outright even once. If patterns develop over long periods of trans girls demonstrating consistently superior results to cis girls, that's one thing, but this seems more like parents finding an excuse to get pissy over their children not making the mark.

She placed 1st numerous of times in the 200 meter. I posted her record a few pages back

This is her first season, with more training she could possibly blow them out.

Also she dominates the 200 meter, so she may be slow to accelerate, but her speed is top tier to those she compete against;



FPj2uva.png


http://www.athletic.net/TrackAndField/Athlete.aspx?AID=9862534#/L0
 
this shouldn't be allowed. i'd be upset as well.



so everyone else's aspirations and dreams be damned? unbelievable.

Can't you say the same about programs to instill diversity into the workplace? I'm sure many "majority" applicants have had their dreams "squashed" in the name of progress. It's the price society pays. I'm wow'd by some of the responses in this thread.
 

Trojita

Rapid Response Threadmaker
Black people in in the Caribbean today did not come from an ancient land split of the Caribbean from Africa.

What is this thread doing with misinformation.
 
why can't some people just keep it 100 and say what they really mean is "HE is ~STEALING~ spots from REAL WOMEN" and stop tiptoeing around with their "i'm not ___ but" weasel words?
 

Kinyou

Member
why can't some people just keep it 100 and say what they really mean is "HE is ~STEALING~ spots from REAL WOMEN" and stop tiptoeing around with their "i'm not ___ but" weasel words?
Because that would mean that the issue is absolutely black and white and there are only extremes to choose from
 

Morrigan Stark

Arrogant Smirk
'hol up...

Golf is segregated (they are given a handicap essentially). So is archery as far as I know. As is something like Kendo (sword fighting). I get that you think individual sports are less about physical strength and more about strategy and whatever you call skill, but there is literally no evidence that supports this.
Yes and no.

Kendo is an unusual example. Typically, in tournaments, there will be a women's division, but, women are allowed to compete with the males (in some tournaments they can even play in both divisions -- I won't lie, I love it :D). And, when they do, they rarely win but sometimes they do win. Whereas I believe it's pretty much unheard of for a woman to win against men of a similar level of experience/skill in other sports...

Basically, the gap between gender for kendo performance is probably not nearly as wide as in most sports. Pure physical strength doesn't matter much, if at all -- some of the best kenshis I've seen were small, short and slender. The factor with the highest gap is speed. Hand and foot speed does matter a lot in competitive kendo, but even that won't matter as much as pure skill (timing, reading your opponent, etc. which is amplified by experience and training). And since a kendo match can be decided very quickly and, well, "anything can happen", a slightly slower but more experienced female kenshi can beat a faster, stronger male opponent. I've not only seen it happen, but I've actually done it. Could I do it repeatedly and consistently? Hard to say, as I rarely get to compete with guys, but I'd venture "probably not" (I'm not that competitive, a more competitive female kendoka probably could).

It is worth pointing out, however, that scoring in kendo is not a 100% objective, measurable thing like in many sports, but it's very much a judgment call (from 3 judges, at least 2 of which must agree to give the point). Judges watch the fight and observe the strikes, and award the point based on a variety of factors (precision of hitting the target, power and control behind the strike, presence of correct footwork, posture, kiai, etc. -- it's very complicated ^^ and that's why only very experienced kenshis become judges). It's not like in fencing where there's an automatic buzzer, or a ball entering a goal/net, or a measurement of time/distance of a throw or something like that. If there were an hypothetical kendo tournament where we measured who can launch the fastest strike in milliseconds or whatever, men would probably have an edge, but that's not how it works

Still, gender segregation does happen, for a number of reasons, but the more significant one, IMO, is that female kenshis are a minority and it's more fun for them to compete between each others and award them medals (women winning medals in male divisions does happen, as I've said, but it's rare simply because the percentage of women even participating is far, far smaller than the men's, men just severely outnumber us). I am 95% sure that male-to-female transgender kenshis could compete in the women's division without a fuss. In fact, I believe I've seen it happen. A few months ago I competed, and faced a woman I suspected (but I am not sure -- I certainly didn't go ask, I'd be mortified if I was wrong xD) was transgender. She had an unusually big and strong upper body for a woman, and her kiai (the "war cry" that we do) sounded, well, pretty manly. Now I've faced tons of different women over a decade and not every woman has the same kind of fighting style, or the same kind of kiai. But, typically, in my experience, you still, well, feel the difference, for lack of better term, when you're fighting a woman or a man, and when facing her, it felt like fighting a man. This doesn't mean she was born male, she could just be an unusually masculine woman, of course. When I went to thank her after the fight, and saw her face and heard her voice, she looked and sounded very androgynous, so I couldn't tell for sure. But, if she was indeed trans, I would have zero problem with her fighting in the women's division again. In fact I think it's pretty cool!

That depends entirely on when the therapy is undertaken and what activity we're talking about.

For something like basketball, obviously a MtF person who is transitioning late will have a huge advantage simply because of height. In most other activities, no, there will be no notable advantage.
This article, posted earlier, suggests there is indeed an advantage for many sports including running:
http://sportsscientists.com/2016/05/hyperandrogenism-women-vs-women-vs-men-sport-qa-joanna-harper/
Basically, testosterone is a significant factor that cannot be discounted.

I'm not. Both her gender and sex are female.
That's... just factually wrong. Sorry.

Chromosomes aren't the hard-and-fast rule you think they are.

And, not gonna lie, seeing all this gender essentialism bullshit on GAF is really discouraging. I'd really rather not deal with that.
You are correct that chromosomes are not a hard and fast rule and there are always unusual exceptions. But, I disagree with the rest of your post; this isn't about gender, but biological sex. No one (I hope) is suggesting that transwomen have a male gender, so this isn't "gender essentialism".
It's a delicate matter when dealing with competitive sports because biological sex is a significant factor. I do suggest you check out the article above as it was written by a transwoman who is quite knowledgeable about the matter.

I genuinely don't understand why you are getting offended.
Because your analogy is ridiculous.

It is even worst because we already live in a world where the OLYMPIC GUIDELINES state that trans people are totaly ok to compete.
Yes, but with a significant caveat re: testosterone level... :p
 

Suikoguy

I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
I'd like to hear more from experts on the situation.
On the surface it seems like a legit concern as opposed to all the bathroom bullshit.
 

Hatty

Member
why can't some people just keep it 100 and say what they really mean is "HE is ~STEALING~ spots from REAL WOMEN" and stop tiptoeing around with their "i'm not ___ but" weasel words?
Are you implying anyone that disagrees with you is a closeted transphobic?
Quote who you're talking about
 

ActWan

Member
15 pages and no mention of the South Park episode where Cartman pretended he's crippled to easily win special olympics trophies?
 

Future

Member
Then it is not unfair.

Like...by definition.

Actually quite the opposite

First Google result on why men run faster than women explains it in some detail

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2008/08/22/sports/olympics/22women.html

On mobile so can't quote, but testosterone and heart size definitely give men the biological advantage. Seems like theories that training or diligence can overcome the biological advantage have been largely debunked. Just because some women might be faster than men doesn't mean anything to the natural advantage

However, if she was on enough therapy that removed those testosterone fueled advantages, it's possible it was fair
 

Skii

Member
Ok? I'm not arguing that point, just that the argument is unecessary and useless

It isn't. Where do you draw the line? Why is it okay for black people to compete in certain events knowing they have a physical advantage but not transgender people?

I'm just playing devil's advocate but it is a very relevant point. Neither of these people choose to be their race or their gender.
 

jabuseika

Member
PED argument is not bad but it is also moot; at the end of the day, trans people have the same right to compete, period.

...and the parents of the other girls will say they have a right to a fair competition, specially if government scholarships are involved.

Just because we have a right to equality doesnt mean we have a right to special treatment.
 
...and the parents of the other girls will say they have a right to a fair competition, specially if government scholarships are involved.

Just because we have a right to equality doesnt mean we have a right to special treatment.

So take the damn scholarships out of the equation.
 
She's been competing -as a girl- for a year; I reaaaally doubt she has not been in treatment for at least that long.

Ha, well that's great and all but you having your doubts doesn't change the fact that she'd have a significant advantage depending on whether or not she's undergoing therapy. From what I've read in this very thread from people with 1st/2nd hand accounts it's like night and day.

PED argument is not bad but it is also moot; at the end of the day, trans people have the same right to compete, period.

I don't think anyone is arguing they have the right to compete – everyone does. But that doesn't mean it shouldn't be regulated in some way or else someone could get seriously hurt.
 
...and the parents of the other girls will say they have a right to a fair competition, specially if government scholarships are involved.

Just because we have a right to equality doesnt mean we have a right to special treatment.

the competition seems fair to me. why don't trans people have a right to a scholarship?
 

SwolBro

Banned
Can't you say the same about programs to instill diversity into the workplace? I'm sure many "majority" applicants have had their dreams "squashed" in the name of progress. It's the price society pays. I'm wow'd by some of the responses in this thread.

This isn't the same thing. Affirmative action isn't supposed to make employers pick less qualified applicants because of race. The playing field is still equal in terms of merit. In this situation a person has a clear advantage above everyone else.

You want to just allow people to get this advantage because you feel bad for them? That's "victim culture" if i've ever seen it.

Ultimately, science is going to have to weigh in. There will be a cut off age where someone can transition and still be allowed to compete. I just don't think it will realistically be an age where someone has considered a change.
 
It isn't. Where do you draw the line? Why is it okay for black people to compete in certain events knowing they have a physical advantage but not transgender people?

I'm just playing devil's advocate but it is a very relevant point. Neither of these people choose to be their race or their gender.
It's a straw man argument. There are middle school boys that would medal in the Olympics against professional women. It's not a fair comparison
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom