• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

P R O M E T H E U S |OT| Ridley Scott goes back to Building Better Worlds

Status
Not open for further replies.

dmshaposv

Member
Are we gonna get a director's cut of this movie, then? with Guy Pearce at TED, and all that?

They might as well do something to justify that shit bad makeup they did on him.
 

Gui_PT

Member
Are we gonna get a director's cut of this movie, then? with Guy Pearce at TED, and all that?

They might as well do something to justify that shit bad makeup they did on him.

Yeah that makeup was horrible.

They could've just used an actual old man. Then the thought crossed my mind, he's going to show up in the sequels and he'll be younger because he found the magic solution he was looking for, and that''s why they used guy pearce in that crappy makeup.

MINDCEPTION
 

Erigu

Member
since this is a post-mortem is he aware why the movie was disappointing to many and about the flaws? Is the interview worth reading for that insight? Any details like that instead of some throwaway line in the script that for some reason he's even more arrogant about?
Sure. We learn so much about him.

For example, he's only human and all that criticism does get to him. Still, it has its uses:
"The mean negatives, there is nothing pleasant about that experience whatsoever for me. I try to not address it unless it’s so horrible that I feel the need to tell everybody who follows me, “Just so you know, there are people out there who says this.”"
Yes, if he retweets the worst / most aggressive criticism, people will sympathize. Good call.
On the other hand, "if somebody says something positive it’s something I want to keep to myself" (not that he necessarily does, but he wants to).
Now, he doesn't say anything about aspiring to improve his craft and learning valuable lessons from some of that criticism, but I'm sure it just slipped his mind.

Wait, no, I'm being silly. About the criticism:
"My feeling is: this is what I signed up for. I am driven and captivated and interested in these open-ended stories that have a high level of interpretation to them. There’s a certain level of frustration that comes with that package."
Lindelof humbly admits that it's his fault for writing smart stuff. Can't be helped.
 

msv

Member
How much did the mission cost again? It was some ridiculous amount I remember. And then they write in mercenary characters that are only in it for the money...

With all the money they had, and the obvious importance of the mission, they couldn't find anyone better than random mercenaries (with a degree, whoopee), who weren't even interested in the mission in the first place. How would it even be possible to obtain people with a scientific degree, who are mercenaries, and don't care at all for a revolution in all their respective fields? Can't really get more ridiculous than that.

Mohawk guy being so scared at first he tries to run away, then loses his way (EVEN THOUGH HE'S THE ONE MAPPING THE FUCKING PLACE), then stumbles back into alien territory, and all of a sudden decides to investigate. Weirdest writing of a character, fuckin hell.

What was the first planet supposed to be? Earth? Because if it is, that's the dumbest shit ever. The alien spreads destroys his DNA and spreads it around - creating all life on Earth, right? So how the fuck did we end up having the same DNA as them? None of it makes a lick of sense, and Lindelof spouting that it has a high level of interpretation, which it hasn't at all, well that just shows he's kind of stupid, doesn't it.
 

Erigu

Member
None of it makes a lick of sense, and Lindelof spouting that it has a high level of interpretation, which it hasn't at all, well that just shows he's kind of stupid, doesn't it.
Well, he should know it's bullshit: he's the one who came up with it. So it's more like he bets on the viewers being easily convinced simpletons.
But yeah, he's kind of stupid himself.
 

Mr_Zombie

Member
With all the money they had, and the obvious importance of the mission, they couldn't find anyone better than random mercenaries (with a degree, whoopee), who weren't even interested in the mission in the first place. How would it even be possible to obtain people with a scientific degree, who are mercenaries, and don't care at all for a revolution in all their respective fields? Can't really get more ridiculous than that.

Yes it can. All those mercenaries agreed to participate in the mission (including being in cryosleep for 4 years IIRC) without even knowing where they are heading and what's the purpose of the mission.
 
Keep going Erigu, you've been spewing your hate at the movie and Lindelof ever since the movie was released. I find it fascinating that since you hate the movie so much, you keep posting regularly here, what is your problem, do you need to make your voice heard or does it make you feel good about yourself?!

Lindelof has been extremely honest about this from the beginning, he also did a Q&A with Seth Graham-Sith where he addressed a lot of things, not only on Prometheus, but about the reception of the movie, how the situation is (Scott sought him out and what he and Spaihts did was to execute Ridley's vision). You can keep hating on him because you and many others don't agree with the choices he did, but if the script was that bad, I think that Scott would have said something.

I still fail to understand all the hate on this, but I really hope we'll see the extended cut on the second BR edition, I do agree some scenes are too short, Weyland was an unnecessary character, but I really love the movie otherwise.

Btw, Spaihts' script, had it been adapted just the way it was would have been incredibly boring and uninmaginative, it was pure chestbursters, facehuggers, xenomorphs shit with everyone or practically being killed, basically a remake or reboot, not interesting since we've seen it again and again.

Lindelof's take to mreverse the balance from 80% Alien, and 20% Engineer to 80% Engineer and 20% Alien was the right one.

As he says, what he likes (open endings, mysteries) will frustrate a lot of people but that does not make him a hack, NOR a douchebag. Just because he says how it is in interviews does not make him a moron or an idiot. Most of you guys would be incapable of doing what this guy does. You dont write scripts in your sleep, it's a lot of work.
 

Erigu

Member
Yes it can. All those mercenaries agreed to participate in the mission (including being in cryosleep for 4 years IIRC) without even knowing where they are heading and what's the purpose of the mission.
It's not that bad:
they all died, so that's only 2 years and some change of hypersleep
.


Lindelof has been extremely honest about this from the beginning
You just used "Lindelof" and "honest" in the same sentence. I'm not sure how you managed to do that.

you and many others don't agree with the choices he did, but if the script was that bad, I think that Scott would have said something.
Yes, let's act as if the movie weren't out there already.
 
Yeah that makeup was horrible.

They could've just used an actual old man. Then the thought crossed my mind, he's going to show up in the sequels and he'll be younger because he found the magic solution he was looking for, and that''s why they used guy pearce in that crappy makeup.

MINDCEPTION

Using a real old man in the role wouldn't prohibit Guy Pearce from playing the younger version of the character.
 

bangai-o

Banned
http://www.slashfilm.com/prometheus...ly-15-minutes-of-footage-deleted-from-ending/

35 minutes of extra footage on the Blu-ray. 15 of which is for the third act.

bothh3ssm.gif
 

jonnyp

Member
Prometheus needed another 45 minutes at least...if not an hour.

I have a hard time seeing how any more footage can even begin to make sense of the characters' actions and motivations - the script is that bad. Not to mention all the other problems this movie has.

Still enjoyed it though but I'm just left thinking what could have been...
 

F#A#Oo

Banned
Padding out guff with more guff isn't the answer. I don't know if you're here to discuss or just to pontificate about how awesome you are.

So a film which posed too many questions should instead be butchered even further...instead of you know attempting to give more time and maybe a few more answers to the audience of the questions it posed?

As I said...fascinating...
 

daviyoung

Banned
So a film which posed too many questions should instead be butchered even further...instead of you know attempting to give more time and maybe a few more answers to the audience of the questions it posed?

As I said...fascinating...

Absolutely, at the moment it's some halfway-house of objective exposition and subjective audience musing. It can be stream-lined to be either one or the other, and make a better movie by doing so. Attempting to answer these questions, based on what we have to go on already, is setting up a trap for itself. More things for it to trip over, and it's already had a rocky start.

Not all movies have to answer posed questions, most of the best movies don't even attempt to. Excepting the extra plot points we expect in the EE, I don't need to see any additions like character-development, or characters-reacting-to-things, which were a few of the more common criticisms of the film.

One of my first posts here after seeing the movie was wishing for a Director's Cut, not for what can be added, but what can be changed. I'm still looking forward to seeing this.

I'm glad I've fascinated you, but as Truman Capote said 'I believe more in the scissors than I do in the pencil.'
 

Suairyu

Banned
So a film which posed too many questions should instead be butchered even further...instead of you know attempting to give more time and maybe a few more answers to the audience of the questions it posed?

As I said...fascinating...
Length does not mean greater understanding. A great bulk of Prometheus' running time was not in service to giving you answers.

A shorter, focused film would likely provide more answers. But it's not a question of editing, but more of script conception.
 
Just watched the movie.

Disappointing to say the least. I don't know if it's the popular opinion around here but I prefer the first half vastly over the second, gave me some real Alien vibes and Fassbender as David was terrific. Some shots were genius, especially one with David roaming the ship, showing what kind of desolation he was exposed to for >2yrs. Made me even more uncomfortable watching him on screen. Standout performance or me.

After the two scientists found the tentacle everything fell apart and if it weren't for the actors and visuals I'd mistake them for two different movies. The zombie scene gotta be one of the most useless scenes in recent memory. It had zero effect on anything. Ending was another level of terrible.

I'd still need time to collect my thoughts and write them down, maybe even a second viewing, but I'm not sure anybody cares so...
 

btkadams

Member
How much did the mission cost again? It was some ridiculous amount I remember. And then they write in mercenary characters that are only in it for the money...

With all the money they had, and the obvious importance of the mission, they couldn't find anyone better than random mercenaries (with a degree, whoopee), who weren't even interested in the mission in the first place. How would it even be possible to obtain people with a scientific degree, who are mercenaries, and don't care at all for a revolution in all their respective fields? Can't really get more ridiculous than that.

Mohawk guy being so scared at first he tries to run away, then loses his way (EVEN THOUGH HE'S THE ONE MAPPING THE FUCKING PLACE), then stumbles back into alien territory, and all of a sudden decides to investigate. Weirdest writing of a character, fuckin hell.

What was the first planet supposed to be? Earth? Because if it is, that's the dumbest shit ever. The alien spreads destroys his DNA and spreads it around - creating all life on Earth, right? So how the fuck did we end up having the same DNA as them? None of it makes a lick of sense, and Lindelof spouting that it has a high level of interpretation, which it hasn't at all, well that just shows he's kind of stupid, doesn't it.
i was under the impression that the aliens created just humans, not all life on earth. did i interpret this incorrectly?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom