I might take one of my friends to go see this since I was 4 when it first came out.
I seen it when it came out with 2 vhs tapes. It was a great movie.I was ten. It was fucking amazing.
I might take one of my friends to go see this since I was 4 when it first came out.
I was ten. It was fucking amazing.
Man, I have four older sisters. I know how long it is.This Dan poster won't amount to a thing! Mark my words, he won't!
You do know Titanic is more than three hours long. Going to be an expensive night.
I was ten. It was fucking amazing.
More than likely eaten by organisms down there.
A lot of the wood content on the ship has also been eaten away. There are even microorganisms devouring the actual steel on Titanic as well.
Here's hoping this movie sweeps at the Oscars again this year.
Now trips to the famed site are much easier: wealthy tourists can pay around $60,000 to take a 8-10 hour trip in a submersible vehicle down to see the actual site themselves.
Can't wait to see this film again in theatres, though we can never forget Cameron's mistake with the Funnels on the ship in the movie.
lol
What mistake?
The room from the movie, but in real life:
The Titanic had four funnels, that is correct. Cameron shows smoke coming from all four funnels in the movie, this is incorrect as one of the funnels was not even a chimney and was completely for show.
Not a huge mistake but it's enough for me to nitpick!
There are very prominent scenes of the sky and apparently the positions of the stars aren't accurate based on the location of the Titanic. I'll look for the video that talks about it, it's pretty cool.Wait, what was wrong with the sky?
There are very prominent scenes of the sky and apparently the positions of the stars aren't accurate based on the location of the Titanic. I'll look for the video that talks about it, it's pretty cool.
Oddly, there is a more clear issue with the sky on the DVD versions, the banding is very bad.
I'm sure the bluray will be exquisite.That is a thing they should fix for the Blu-ray release.
The remaster is gorgeous.
That's right you have already seen it.
So someone was saying they never show images of the stern section of the wreck...
well...
whoa, the set they used in the movie is exact, even down to the debris near the fireplace.
If you are talking about the footage of the submerged ship, in the movie it is not a set, is the actual ship, they made a huge deal about it from what I remember.
I dislike the movie as I do most of Cameron's films, but he is a master of advertisement and production values, kind of like a Michel Bay, without the obnoxiousness.
If you are talking about the footage of the submerged ship, in the movie it is not a set, is the actual ship, they made a huge deal about it from what I remember.
I dislike the movie as I do most of Cameron's films, but he is a master of advertisement and production values, kind of like a Michel Bay, without the obnoxiousness.