Pctx said:
1.) How isn't it a take over? You pay a tax if you don't get a plan. Explain that to me.
2.) It has worked but did I say it was perfect? No. There are ways to innovate ways to bring down the costs including getting more varieties of medicines outside of the US, better education on preventative care, etc. The reason premiums go up is because no one dictates how much the insurance companies can charge. One way of changing that is by changing the marketplace.
3.) This is something that I think needs to be looked at more closely. The sweeping pre-existing condition exception I think goes to far but again, that's just my opinion.
4.) Back to #1, you have the government penalizing people by not having insurance? Which is worse? (read that as lesser of the two evils?)
5.) Medicare/Medicade. Again, not perfect, needs to be fixed but this health care bill doesn't "fix" the right things.
1. If you can't afford a plan due to unemployment, low income, you won't be responsible for paying a fee. For those who can afford the fee and still don't want to get insurance, too bad. I don't want to pay for someone who get ill and refused to have insurance so that the rest of us are left to pay for them.
2. How can preventive care help those who get cancer? Heart disease that is genetically connected? Someone breaks their hand from falling? Preventative education and more variety of medicine won't change the market place for the vast majority of individuals who file for bankruptcy due to health insurance fees.
3. You say the exception goes too far and that it needs to be look at more closely? Give me some ideas that you have? Insurance providers WILL NOT stop rejecting people for pre-existing conditions without the government competing or regulating. Won't happen. Sorry.
4. Having to pay a fee in the hundreds of dollars (if you can afford it again) is quite different than not being able to pay for an office visit that left you with a 2,3, $10,000 bill.
5. How do you fix medicare/medicaid?