Conkerkid11
Member
What are you implying exactly?Not worried. They probably pre order games.
What are you implying exactly?Not worried. They probably pre order games.
Rocket League is the better game.GwG just got AC. PS+ should compete with that.
Why are people even responding to Vibrant? He's obviously nothing but a troll with nothing to say.
He's using "They probably pre-order games." like it invalidates someone's opinion. You all should just be laughing internally and ignoring him.
What's Rocket League?GwG just got AC. PS+ should compete with that.
lolThere are two types of people in this thread:
- Those who are excited about Rocket League
- Those who have not played Rocket League
The Rocket League beta worked better then the last Assassin's Creed game did at launch.Rocket League is the better game.
Again that is subjective and you don't decide if people should feel fine or not about the value they get on the products and services they expend their own money. Each and everyone of us gets their own money and each has its own scale into how much they appreciate each dollar we earn. If people see poor value then it is their perception and it isn't any better than yours that perceive good value.
If you can't find anything worthy with what PS+ is offering, then send your message to sony by stop paying for it while most people find it worthy before they're not even halfway through they're subcription.
I was always curious about Styx, but the price always drove me away and it's rarely on sale. Agreed, good choice.Styx is a really good choice. It isn't quite good enough to buy, but it is more than good enough to play and enjoy.
The issue here is that people are misjudging things they haven't yet played.Who says I will not complain to sony about this? This thread is terrible in understanding that people value different things and that every paying consumer is ENTITLED (yes that word) to receive the best service they think possible, that is the whole reason they are paying customers.
Bottom line is that it seems a sin in this threads to say "I don't like the offerings of PS+" and even worse to not like indie games or to want old AAA games above new indies. It is great if people like indies more than AAA games or retail games or whatever but complaining about why people complain about the perceptive lack of value on the service they are paying for, is acting like a borderline corporate apologist .
There are two types of people in this thread:
- Those who are excited about Rocket League
- Those who have not played Rocket League
The issue here is that people are misjudging things they haven't yet played.
PS+ this month is worth it solely for Rocket League.
If it isn't, then you aren't a fan of anything fun, and I question why you pay for PS+
Then how on Earth can you possibly expect every single month of PS+ to satisfy every single type of person?I am not interested in Rocket League. People get their fun from different things. Is why there are different kind of approaches to the same genre. And like most people that have a PS4 I pay it for online mostly, but since the services is an entire package I would want the games that I am paying for to sometimes be of my interest. Otherwise I will suggest Sony to make a lower tier of PS+ so I can only pay for online and miss on all the great indie titles they give currently on PS+.
Then how on Earth can you possibly expect every single month of PS+ to satisfy every single type of person?
Mind you that at this point it doesn't even seem like a genre people want, rather than a specific game. Which leaves the question, "why don't you just buy that one game, rather than paying for an annual service for the slim chance to get it for free?"?
I don't. I never say that. PS+ current state has been bad for over a year (since the release of PS4 actually) I clearly said "sometimes". I am mostly against the mentality in this thread that PS+ is a sent gift from heavens and everyone that doesn't see the value of it is wrong and that no one should complain because we are paying only 13 cents per day for the service.
Again the main issue is that I am oblige to pay for the current games when I am not interested and haven't been interested for almost 2 years. I would rather pay for online only and be done with it. If Sony pushed the games on a $60 tier and let online-discounts-cloud saving on a $40-50 tier I would be OK with it and most likely take advantage of it.
Wait, there are people who pay for PS+ at full price rather than waiting for it to go on sale?I don't. I never say that. PS+ current state has been bad for over a year (since the release of PS4 actually) I clearly said "sometimes". I am mostly against the mentality in this thread that PS+ is a sent gift from heavens and everyone that doesn't see the value of it is wrong and that no one should complain because we are paying only 13 cents per day for the service.
Again the main issue is that I am oblige to pay for the current games when I am not interested and haven't been interested for almost 2 years. I would rather pay for online only and be done with it. If Sony pushed the games on a $60 tier and let online-discounts-cloud saving on a $40-50 tier I would be OK with it and most likely take advantage of it.
It currently costs $50, and you are okay with that price if you don't get games? You want them to raise the price of PS+ for people that want the games? You make zero sense.
Yeah that would be cool. Not gonna happen, but yeah. I can't remember the last PS+ game I bothered downloading.Yes I was implying that. I would rather the online only to be between $25-30 personally but I know how business works and I know that the only way for a subscription fee to go down is if another of "increased value" goes up.
Yes I was implying that. I would rather the online only to be between $25-30 personally but I know how business works and I know that the only way for a subscription fee to go down is if another of "increased value" goes up.
Yes I was implying that. I would rather the online only to be between $25-30 personally but I know how business works and I know that the only way for a subscription fee to go down is if another of "increased value" goes up.
So really, because you don't like the games offered in the past two years even though they cover all genres, you want people that like them to pay more money. You are okay with continuing to pay $50, and get no games, while the subscription cost of others increases. You gain nothing because you pay the same amount, except you lose any games that you might like. This is hilarious.
Yes, how is that hard to believe? I want a cheaper online only tier for PS+ if the games offered for PS4 are going to keep being what it has been for the past 20 months. My consumer part wants that tier to be priced $25-30, that will never happpen, the best is a $40 tier but that will never happen either, why? Because subscriptions fees never go down.
So when (not if, when) PS+ services goes up, I would want a separate tier for those of us that are currently not interested in the games offered by PS+ for PS4. And we all win, everyone in this threads will be more happy since less people will bitch about lack of value on PS+ and we that don't like indie games stop subsidizing those who do.
The people that are defending this month are probably the same people that pre order and wonder why games are released broken.
How would we all win? You want the price of PS+ to go up. I think many would be unhappy if that happened. How is it guaranteed the price will go up? I don't recall the price of Xbox Live going up. In the end, you want to pay what you are currently paying but get less, which is just ridiculous. You seem to be jealous of the people that have an open mind to actually try out the games being offered.
Fuck this service. It's spoiled gamers too much and it was a terrible mistake.
Ps+ had injustice, a newer game than black and a retail game already. If anything, it's black flag that's competing with that from 6 months ago.
The people that are defending this month are probably the same people that pre order and wonder why games are released broken.
Ps+ had injustice, a newer game than black and a retail game already. If anything, it's black flag that's competing with that from 6 months ago.
snip
Xbox live was $50 once upon a time. There is a thing called inflation you know and products and services usually face price adjustments every few years to match that.
So expressing an opinion about a gaming service on a discussion forum specific to gaming is "bitching" now? Lovely.You do know you pay PS+ as a whole and not just to get your so called "indies" and online:
The $50 you pay for a year of PS+ gets you:
- Games across all 3 platforms
- Discounts of to 75% off
- Game trials (PS3 and coming soon to PS4)
- Exclusive Betas
- PlayStation Originals Series
- Online on PS4
if you don't like to pay a year of PS+ for that value you can pay monthly $10 for when you feel like playing online and not bitch about it.
Yo Led, what kind of games do you like? What are some of your best recent game or some of your best game ever? You seem very limited into genres considering the good variety even if mostly indies. What current gen platform do you own man?
I'm not saying you're THAT specific guy, but i can imagine a casual Call of duty player having to pay 13 cent per day to play is only master race game online, not caring about anyting else, hoping for 6 new AAA+10/10 call of duty game every month for free to justify their subscription, but they rather paying less to only play online.
Yes i am over exagerating. Again i'm not saying you're that guy, but do you even try any game? indies games are not for everyone of course, they're mostly aimed at old skool gamer i think, but even if its not aimed at you, give them a try at least.
I don't. I never say that. PS+ current state has been bad for over a year (since the release of PS4 actually) I clearly said "sometimes". I am mostly against the mentality in this thread that PS+ is a sent gift from heavens and everyone that doesn't see the value of it is wrong and that no one should complain because we are paying only 13 cents per day for the service.
Again the main issue is that I am oblige to pay for the current games when I am not interested and haven't been interested for almost 2 years. I would rather pay for online only and be done with it. If Sony pushed the games on a $60 tier and let online-discounts-cloud saving on a $40-50 tier I would be OK with it and most likely take advantage of it. And I could see a lot of people coming with me and the bitching on PS+ thread from the last 2 years will diminish a lot because there are going to be less people oblige to pay for a part of a service they aren't using or care.
I have no idea what game are you talking about, if is Knack or Assassins Creed BF, my guess is as good as yours. I know I would rather have BF than any other current PS+ game but that is my personal preference.
Ugh what a shame every PS+ and GWG thread ends up like this.
I am going to have to check out this rocket league everyone seems so keen on.
You do know you pay PS+ as a whole and not just to get your so called "indies" and online:
The $50 you pay for a year of PS+ gets you:
- Games across all 3 platforms
- Discounts of to 75% off
- Game trials (PS3 and coming soon to PS4)
- Exclusive Betas
- PlayStation Originals Series
- Online on PS4
if you don't like to pay a year of PS+ for that value you can pay monthly $10 for when you feel like playing online and not bitch about it.
Just stop. They didn't charge more cause of inflation, because my ISP or cell phone doesn't inflate, in fact they always been giving MORE bandwidth for the same price.
MSFT charges that because they think/know they can. Just like when the 360 came out it was $50 for first party, and $60 for third party. They only changed first party to $60 when the flagship Halo 3 was announced. Why?
Cause they think/knew they could. Then Sony followed soon after. They didn't need to up it, they don't pay themselves the $10 licensing fee per game (hence why 3rd parties were $60 to begin with). But announce it with Halo, and people will not blink an eye.
If anything they should not have gone up any more than cell phones or ISP's do. They should be adding more features for the same price over time.
But they knew they could. It's not inflation, or the games would have followed suit.
My favorite recent game would be MGS GZ
Based on the beta, I very much disagree, but to each their own.Rocket League is the better game.
That's just a painfully stupid reply to that post.You want to discuss if the effects of inflation aren't real? What?
So you get your most favorite recent game on the service and still feel the urge to complain?
So expressing an opinion about a gaming service on a discussion forum specific to gaming is "bitching" now? Lovely.
I bought on release and mentioned as a plus on the current state of the game, but I am partial as hell because I know the game is basically a rip off that takes advantage of the fanaticism of MGS fans. Like I said only us will think that paying $30 for MGS GZ is good value. As a PS+ game I find incredible that it is on the service but I don't full myself I know well that it is a paid demo and that the actual value is very little for the non MGS fan.