JetBlackPanda
Member
Multiplayer?? BAH!! not interested in that but hope its decent for people who care I guess.
SCE needs a new logo. Looks so dated.
Hello. They should have made Ellie look more like her.
No thanks. I'm fine with the way it is.
So let's say you actually tried the multiplayer and it turned out to be fun? What then?
And like I said, the whole 'people only play for 2 weeks' is a flat out wrong. UC3 launched in Nov. me and several buddies have been playing since then. I've seen profiles of people who have logged hundreds of hours in the multiplayer. Everything you claim is wrong. And even if not a single person bought UC3 for the multiplayer (not true because I know several people who haven't even finished the campaign), they tried it out, liked it and stuck with it. Naughty Dog is still working and adding things to the multiplayer all the time.
But no, no one plays it.
SCE needs a new logo. Looks so dated.
SCE needs a new logo. Looks so dated.
SCE needs a new logo. Looks so dated.
Worse than Naughty Dog's? That thing is so grotesque it nearly ruins the cover.
It's a ...logo :\ what has of more grotesque to any others?
man, we go through the same discussion over and over again. what's the problem in having mp? some people might enjoy it...
No problem at all ofcourse. Unless a mediocre unnecessary multiplayer experoience takes vailuable time, money and recources from a single player, ultimately making the single player a lesser experience than it could have been.
I think ND deserves the benefit of the doubt here though. I had the same concern about Uncharted 2, but that turned out rather well.
Also this game had the longest dev time of any of their games.The PS3 is 6 years into its life and this is ND's 4th game this gen, the previous 2 games having multiplayer.
I think they know what they are doing and I trust them.
Also this game had the longest dev time of any of their games.
Yeah right after UC2.When did development start, 2009?
Huh? It's part of a cover. There's a discussion going on about something as insignificant as cover art, not the image they chose to use for the cover, and branding is part of that. It's very dated, obtrusive and clashes with the graphic design. Simple.
No please... I think it's actually perfect and it has aged pretty well.
EDIT: Pardon me. I confused it with the "Sony Computer Entertainment presents" line at the start-up of every one of their games. They can upgrade the logo indeed even though it looks quite nice still.
Also has migrating birds flying in the distance:
They do move, infact the shader actually changes to reflect the skin moving.
It's very subtle but obvious once slowed down:
Like i said before it manages to be realistic but stylized enough not to appear creepy/uncanny, yet despite some cartoony-ness to some expressions (the sitting dude, when you see a hand picking up a machete) they can be very subtle about it, like in this case, which is good.
ND's planning to make us cry with this game, I guarantee it.
Ellie: "Is it true? What you said earlier? About there being people here who didn't always try to kill one other, a long time ago?"
*Joel looks longingly at the starry night sky*
Joel: "I...yes, it's true."
Ellie: "Can you...tell me about it, just this once? About the neon lights and those car things you told me about? About Christmas?"
Joel: "Well, when I was a boy around your age--" *speech*
*at some point Ellie falls asleep during the speech, to which Joel smiles and tucks her in*
I already had my Last of Us fanfiction written when the game was announced
stereotypical bonfire scene fanfiction:
This one:
I'd just remove the picture part and tidy up the font/s. When I look at it I think of the early 90's
Ugh. Hopefully those bonus skins are just for multiplayer. I don't want to be forced to preorder another game at Gamestop.
Damage control, money is still spent on pointless multiplayer that nobody will play for longer than 1-2 weeks because single player games are bought by people interested in single player games. If it wasn't being spent on that it could be spent on another Sony project (if it isn't given to Naughty Dog single player crew like he says). People who casually play arcade based multiplayer-only (like COD) are not interested in last of us 5 v 5 3rd person cover based deathmatch.
When I see me-too multiplayer I think about what that time and money could have been spent on instead, whether a naughty dog project or not. I don't think about the people who bought Uncharted 3 for it's multi-player because they don't exist.
If anyone thinks MP means the SP will be in trouble.... just stop, please stop. Naughty Dog, nuff said.
This one:
I'd just remove the picture part and tidy up the font/s. When I look at it I think of the early 90's
Yes, if anyone is worried then read this: http://cow3wf11.tk/2012/12/naughty-dog-comments-on-the-last-of-us-multiplayer-doubts/ND earned my trust with UC2 so the inclusion of the MP doesn't both me, in fact if it has the same care and attention put into it like UC2 then I'll definitely play for hours on end.
If anyone thinks MP means the SP will be in trouble.... just stop, please stop. Naughty Dog, nuff said.