If it's during black loading screens that's not burn-in, but mura:
wow thats nasty looking.
If it's during black loading screens that's not burn-in, but mura:
Because human eyes sensitivity actually perceives the gray-glow of LCD in darkness, but the only way to capture it on camera sensors is using long-exposure.Frankfurter said:What I'm trying to get at is that I don't know why you'd just chose a 4 seconds exposure time.
It doesn't. I mean it may do, but that's not the real black level that I see on my monitor, so imo that comparison is BS.
Because what your eye finds appealing and what you can consciously separate as superior are two entirely different things.
A rock solid 30 fps versus a solid 60 fps isn't something most people can inherently pick out, but the 60 fps game unequivocally feels smoother to all users. How then do you outline the importance of frame rate to someone who can't pick out the difference on their own?
You proportionally scale both the 30 fps source and the 60 fps source down (as lower frame rate results in more perceptible difference) until the person sees the divide.
It's the same with Durante's image. In order to make the difference readily apparent he scales the exposure up to highlight amplify that delta without changing the ratio of said delta.
Your eye might not see an LCD as being that gray, but it definitely notices how washed out blacks look on them. Durante's image outlines the reason why blacks look so much nicer on OLEDs in a way even passing observation can pick out.
Durante said:I'll take that picture for you later today. I just don't think it will be nearly as helpful for comparison as the one I posted -- it will just be a gray rectangle floating in space.
This is some weird burn-in.
This thread makes me worried :/ BTW does Sony do anything if the OLED does burn out?
Not burn in actually.Sorry for the bump but I think my vita has a burn in or mura effect or whatever.
There is a small black dot on the center of the screen that is only noticeable on pitch black screens (such as loading screens) but after playing Marvel vs Capcom 3 I see it in the somewhat dark blue menus as well.
I heard that if it's relatively light and not completely burned in you can put on some special videos that blast color and slow down the process or even reverse it, is that true? At least in the case of OLED? Or am I SOL and it's getting worse?
EDIT: Oh shit I'm a member now?
Not burn in actually.
It's just the mura effect, which actually starts to go away over time.
At least it has on my two Vitas.
It does? Oh thank god!
I despise downloading games because even after I plug it in and leave it on it goes to sleep and pauses all downloads which is infuriating.
Fortunately today (when I downloaded guacamalee, UmvsC3, killzone beta and darkstalkers) I realized that I could just download 20 or so super colorful pics and leave it running on a fast slideshow. Think that is a good idea?
Is this a rampant problem? I've never heard of this. What are the ways to prevent this? I'm considering a Vita by the end of the year
Mine is set to sleep after a minute of inactivity. Had it since 02/2012
I had the Killzone Beta go to 95% today in sleep mode before checking it to find it stopped, and had like 10 huge PSOne games DL onto my 8GB card last week w/ no problems. Try this, maybe?
3ds screen is a whole different level of bad.All of a sudden, 3DS' screen isn't half-bad.
It wasn't bad in the first place.
Vita screen is a cheap Samsung, what else to expect. I'm surprised by the amount of posts saying the screen is gorgeous. IPad or nexus might be considered gorgeous...not the vita junk.
Vita screen is a cheap Samsung, what else to expect. I'm surprised by the amount of posts saying the screen is gorgeous. IPad or nexus might be considered gorgeous...not the vita junk.
It is an IPS and a good one at that. But it will eventually.My iPhone does not suffer from burn in.
All of a sudden, 3DS' screen isn't half-bad.
It wasn't bad in the first place.
There's nothing cheap about OLED displays (from Samsung). It's probably the most expensive display technology. iPad 3 was using Samsung screens, the previous iPad's were using LG screens. But Apple had to go to Samsung, because they were the only one that could deliver the high quality 2048x1536 resolution screens. Both LG and Sharp failed to deliver them. Apple only stopped using them because of the lawsuit.
And OLED screens are easier to get burn-in problems because it's using organic compounds. It's a totally different technology than the ones you mentioned, that is used in the iPad/Nexus. Which are TFT-LCD screens.
The Vita/OLED screen is gorgeous because of it's popping colours, wide viewing angles and infinite black levels. The downside is of course it's more prone to burn-in.
You're acting like burn-in on OLED displays has never happened before. It's a common thing on all phones with OLED displays.
3DS has the worst screen in a modern device, I'd take burn in risks any day of the week.
Mura effect is half the reason I sold my Vita. It seriously set off my OCD like nothing else has in a decade or more.
3DS has the worst screen in a modern device, I'd take burn in risks any day of the week.
3ds screen is a whole different level of bad.
The rapture thread completely broke my sarcasm meter, I don't know who's joking anymore.Not sure if GAF is smart anymore.
I was kidding, guys.
Eh, it's Nintendo, you wouldn't expect them to use the best or most expensive screens. I think the screen is okay on the OG 3DS. It has an acceptable dpi. The 3DS XL though, the huge screen paired with the low resolution just hurts the IQ too much. That's why I still haven't upgraded, I want to, since i'm playing so much 3DS lately.
The worst screens in modern devices goes to Sony smartphones (Xperia Z etc.). They are supposed to be flagship phones, they are expensive and yet uses standard LCD screens with terrible viewing angles.
This is a serious and educated discussion about useless electronics. So please...pls.Not sure if GAF is smart anymore.
I was kidding, guys.
This is a serious and educated discussion about useless electronics. So please...pls.
Not sure why Sony didn't go with non-OLED screens like with their phones and tablet. They're pretty great and colorful, maybe cheaper, and without these issues.
I'm posting this from a Sony tablet. I also went from OLED Lumia to LCD Xperia. Not garbage, and I don't see how OLED would be "better for gaming".They are definitely cheaper but they are apparently garbage and OLED is best for gaming.
I'm posting this from a Sony tablet. I also went from OLED Lumia to LCD Xperia. Not garbage, and I don't see how OLED would be "better for gaming".
Sorry for the double post and bump but looks like my "mura effect" or whatever is getting worse. It only used to show up during black screens but now I'm seeing it on darker colors (except green colors) even when playing.
Getting really annoying seeing that in UMvsC3.
So I was thinking of just having this video run all night tonight
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VN-KIlsxxOw
I know it says for HD LCD screens but I really have no other options. The Vita is used so no warranty, am I SOL?
OLED inherently suffers from burn in and vita is no excuse. As long as you don't leave the screen running static doing nothing (on power save setting just put it to 1 minute before sleeping) and don't browse the internet on it (there are 2 black bars which never move during internet browsing so using that alot will cause bad burn in) then your good to go.
that does nothing
it's a inherit property of the oled screen
a big reason i stopped play my vita
Is there something different with AMOLED screens, because I've never had a burn in on one of those?