There's not enough popcorn in the world.
Challenge accepted
There's not enough popcorn in the world.
I gotta give Jim props for being willing to have this case dismissed with prejudice and not destroying this guy in court. I don't now if I would have made the same decision if I was in the same circumstances.
I gotta give Jim props for being willing to have this case dismissed with prejudice and not destroying this guy in court. I don't now if I would have made the same decision if I was in the same circumstances.
He didn't have a lawyer though.Just watched about half the video. This is amazing. I mean, to watch on YouTube, not to actually experience.
Any idiot with a lawyer is still an idiot.
40 minutes?
This is my commute home sorted.
I know nothing about law.
Can someone explain why Jim HAD to defend himself against this case.
It was clear to everyone that it was complete and utter bullshit. But is he obligated to defend himself?
It seems unfair that you have to be dragged into something like this, pay tens of thousands of dollars to defend yourself, just because someone accused you, regardless of the validity of the claim.
I know nothing about law.
Can someone explain why Jim HAD to defend himself against this case.
It was clear to everyone that it was complete and utter bullshit. But is he obligated to defend himself?
It seems unfair that you have to be dragged into something like this, pay tens of thousands of dollars to defend yourself, just because someone accused you, regardless of the validity of the claim.
He didn't have a lawyer though.
I know nothing about law.
Can someone explain why Jim HAD to defend himself against this case.
It was clear to everyone that it was complete and utter bullshit. But is he obligated to defend himself?
It seems unfair that you have to be dragged into something like this, pay tens of thousands of dollars to defend yourself, just because someone accused you, regardless of the validity of the claim.
If someone sues you and you don't respond, usually the court renders default judgement against you if there's even the barest suggestion that their lawsuit has merit. There's theoretically ways to fix that after it happens, but they're probably as expensive as defending yourself in the first place. Or more so; google 'craigslist printer lawsuit' to see what I mean.
It sucks, but I guess otherwise people could get out of any civil suit like this by just ignoring it for long enough.
Ain't that the truth.I dont know, just a crazy system.
This was the second most hilariously pathetic lawsuit saga in video game history after the Tim Langdell thing. Good job standing up to those idiots and pushing another hustler out of the industry.
What happened with that?
"You didn't win... they lost.
.....
They won this round"
lol
On September 25th 2015 the defendant tweeted: "According to the email, this ECC Games is pursuing legal action against Digital Homicide for using its name. Not enough popcorn on Earth."
I did tweet that, I'm not sure how that's libel. They seem to think it's because I'm getting enjoyment from the situation, which I was, because it was a fucking farce.
My lawyer countered this actually, by claiming that we can't prove whether or not there's enough popcorn on Earth.
Which we can't, I mean that's basically the allegation here, they're saying Jim said there's not enough popcorn on Earth, so we've fired back by saying: "Prove it."
I wouldn't listen to it if driving. It will probably bring about casual road rage lol.
Love the Ace Attorney music in the background!
Part of me wishes Jim had just counter-sued and make the guy pay for the legal fees.
He'd be wage-garnished for the next several years.
The cost in doing so would be throwing good money after bad. I could no more get my legal fees back from Romine than Romine could get $15million from me.
The energy and time spent doing so would be better spent continuing to produce and improve my content. Unlike Digital Homicide, I try not to waste work hours pursuing grudges.
This "settlement" was as much pragmatism as lenience. I'm not that good a person. A continuation of vindictiveness would lead to pyrrhic results at best.
I meant what I said when I stated I couldn't hurt James more than he's hurt himself, and I do not care enough to want to try. There have been times over this past year where I was angry enough to want to, where I desired to let this play out just to officially destroy the arguments, send a message, and demand non-monetary compensation (I'm serious in my offer for the Digital Homicide brand name, but I'm not paying over three figures for it). Now it's over, however, I just don't feel it. This whole thing ended rather sadly, and the desire for merciless revenge just isn't there.
Honestly - and I am not saying this to be insulting - I think the Romines got in over their head and got frightened. I would have been as well. But then I'm looking at two guys who I think are scared, and there's nothing to be gained from kicking people who are worried like that. This is also why I'm stopping my coverage of the lawsuit at this video, instead of the more extravagant and extended verbal kicking I'd dreamed about while at my angriest. I have folders of content collected over the past year that I hope I won't ever need to touch.
I've said before that I want the Romines to become good videogame developers. I would still like to see that. I enjoy a good redemption story, and I'd be the first to praise anything they made that was genuinely good.
All this said, however, I certainly do not forgive James Romine for this lawsuit and I don't think I'll ever be able to forget it. It'd take more than an apology for me to truly be "classy" and accept a real peace. My "classiness" extends to resetting the clock on my opinion of their work, should their work ever be notable enough to cross my desk again.
I laughed at the bumps to 12 and then 15m.Halfway through the video, but here are my thoughts so far.
Representing himself in court.
MFW:
Dude fucking bumped the charges up by 2 mil. Bruh are you stupid?
Legal costs are really a pain. H3H3 seems more complicated, but anyway:
Par la train, Mon amie.
And it was glorious.
Anyone else see a spunking cock drawn on the document? Or was that just my dirty mind...
Jim, was ownership of "Jim Fucking Sterling Son" ever discussed?
Jim, was ownership of "Jim Fucking Sterling Son" ever discussed?
That was what I was going to ask - I'm amazed, AMAZED, that he didn't think to put that in 'the document'.