TheHeretic
Banned
ShockingAlberto said:For whatever it's worth, I naturally assume legal counsel for a corporate entity will fight viciously for their client and will do whatever they can to paint the opposition in a bad light. That's what they do. Believing them wholesale speaks to such a level of sycophancy that I struggle to even put it in to words.
In the OT Corporations are the birth spawn of Satan, in this thread a Corporations legal PR, designed to exaggerate any claims to the nth degree (as any serious lawyer would do) is reality. Its schizophrenic and in the end it doesn't say positive things about the posters here, or the user-base as a whole.
MrPliskin said:I believe people are more concerned that he asked for donations, and then (in poor taste) went on a Vacation. It means he either had enough money to go on a vacation, or he used donated funds to take a vacation.
Either way, from this point of view, it looks like poor form and bad behavior, and certainly not someone I want representing my consumer rights.
On the other hand, this could have been long planned, though I find that unlikely, but still possible.
Right. Being overseas does not equate to being on vacation. Theres no evidence that he paid for the trip, or that it was booked post the legal dispute, and from whence the money came is unknown. It only looks bad to people posting on an internet forum, his explanation of events is what will matter in court.