• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NHL '12 Playoffs |OT| "The Cup is our destiny this year."

Smiley90

Stop shitting on my team. Start shitting on my finger.
No he didn't. he used Bertuzzi as an example of fighting to stand up as he did against Weber, etc. And then they talked about the tough guys now you want are the guys who are more than just the 5 minute goons of yesteryear.

They're bringing up good points, but completely missing the mark.

I still would've preferred if he didn't bring up someone with Bertuzzi's history in a discussion about "how to properly and cleanly stand up for each other".
 

bardia

Member
I'm sure this will come handy for people here:

HSedinKnocks.gif
 

ShaneB

Member
I still would've preferred if he didn't bring up someone with Bertuzzi's history in a discussion about "how to properly and cleanly stand up for each other".

I agree with you 100%, and in my opinion Bertuzzi shouldn't be playing hockey if Steve Moore isn't playing. It's a bad example, but just wanted to clarify that's not exactly what PJ was talking about.

I keep bringing up the NFL and how they've handled discipline. Look at the explosion of controversy of Bounty-gate and the New Orleans Saints. How different is that from a team sending a goon out to send a message/get payback/hurt someone???? I'm not a big football guy, but it's certainly clear they're putting in the right measures to defend quarterbacks, ie their star players, and the NHL just seems completely lost and stuck in the past of what's a hockey play and what's dirty.
 

Smiley90

Stop shitting on my team. Start shitting on my finger.
... Oh god. Vince Vaughn for Chicago, Will Ferrel for LA. GREEN MEN NEEDED FOR GAME 5.
 
So pissed I have to sleep and miss the end of this. Great game. I fully expect the Nucks to pull it out. They've been pretty dominant. Kings win would be pure will from Quick.

Make your arguments, whatever they are. But enough with resorting to the meaningless 'you don't know old hockey like I do' stuff.

Fair enough. Bottom line is there is nothing INHERENTLY wrong with a large majority of headshots. Yes they can be dangerous, but they also have a long tradition in the game. A player with the puck has traditionally assumed the risk to his body. If you disagree with that, it's fine, but quite frankly it ISN'T an absolute truth like you seem to believe it is. The guy with the puck needs to be the most aware person on the ice. Bottom line. The fact that a shot is to the head does not make it inherently "dirty" or "wrong." That's an extremely recent development and certainly doesn't qualify under whatever your definition of "common sense" is. Any regulation of headshots should keep in mind that things like skating with your head down, coasting across the blueline coming into the zone, and making poorly placed stretch passes almost WARRANT a headshot in a lot of ways. Also considering the level the head is at relative to the shoulder very often restricting players from making that contact seriously limits the ability of a lot of players to make legitimate defensive plays.

I understand that you think headshots are per se indecent or something, but realistically there are plenty of other things that could be done in terms of equipment, slowing the game down generally, and player education that could also be effective in reducing injuries. Headshots are always going to happen. To suggest that they are inherently wrong ignores a lot of what made the game great for a long time. I understand the safety concerns, but "headshots" in and of themselves are not the problem. There are other factors at play and you have to weigh what value each one has to the game.
 
I agree with you 100%, and in my opinion Bertuzzi shouldn't be playing hockey if Steve Moore isn't playing. It's a bad example, but just wanted to clarify that's not exactly what PJ was talking about.

I keep bringing up the NFL and how they've handled discipline. Look at the explosion of controversy of Bounty-gate and the New Orleans Saints. How different is that from a team sending a goon out to send a message/get payback/hurt someone???? I'm not a big football guy, but it's certainly clear they're putting in the right measures to defend quarterbacks, ie their star players, and the NHL just seems completely lost and stuck in the past of what's a hockey play and what's dirty.

Because it's a different dynamic. A quarterback is more removed, so they can't really do something "dirty". In hockey there's star players actually doing the dirty stuff. Ovechkin with his knee on knee bullshit for a while, Crosby with stuff he's done, Pronger and all the times he was suspended over his career. There have been plenty of superstars who do it because they can get away with it because they sort of do "protect their superstars" at least on some level. They just don't always protect them the same. It's not really analogous.
 
Top Bottom