• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Hobbit - Official Thread of Officially In Production

Status
Not open for further replies.

Slime

Banned
I think they should shuffle them around.

Part I: An Unexpected Journey
Part II: Riddles in the Dark
Part III: There and Back Again
 

Edmond Dantès

Dantès the White
I think they should shuffle them around.

Part I: An Unexpected Journey
Part II: Riddles in the Dark
Part III: There and Back Again
That wouldn't really leave much in the way of narrative for the first film if Riddles in the Dark is saved for the second film.

An Unexpected Party
Roast Mutton
A Short Rest
Over Hill And Under Hill


Riddles In The Dark
Out Of The Frying-Pan Into The Fire
Queer Lodgings
Flies And Spiders
Barrels Out Of Bond
A Warm Welcome
On The Doorstep
Inside Information
Not At Home
Fire And Water
The Gathering Of The Clouds
A Thief In The Night
The Clouds Burst
The Return Journey
The Last Stage


This would be better.

An Unexpected Party
Roast Mutton
A Short Rest
Over Hill And Under Hill
Riddles In The Dark
Out Of The Frying-Pan Into The Fire
Queer Lodgings
Flies And Spiders
Barrels Out Of Bond

A Warm Welcome
On The Doorstep
Inside Information
Not At Home
Fire And Water
Plus White Council stuff

The Gathering Of The Clouds
A Thief In The Night
The Clouds Burst
The Return Journey
The Last Stage
Plus expanded Dwarf stuff/politics/Necromancer end/epilogue
 

Curufinwe

Member
Yep it would make it pretty easy to ignore.

I don't even know what happens between the two, I suspect I'm not missing much.

Someone who had never read The Hobbit could say the same thing about it, but thanks for letting us know that you're not interested in something you know nothing about.
 
You mean like the story of what Gandalf was up to while he wasn't with the company? Just having him vanish for like the whole movie will feel odd, it will just be an unanswered question.

That stuff is already in the two movies. No need to shoot extra stuff for that. My point was that shooting new stuff and spreading things even more thinly is not what I want.
 

Curufinwe

Member
Maybe it's nostalgia talking, but I would love to see them bring back Aragorn, Boromir, Faramir and Denethor for a bridge movie. And the Balrog. Show Balin (or one of his followers) actually writing in the book that Gandalf reads from in Moria in FOTR.

2951 - Sauron reveals himself in Mordor, and starts raising Barad-dûr anew. Estel, later known as Aragorn, comes of age and is told about his heritage; the Corsairs of Umbar officially ally themselves with Mordor and destroy great monument commemorating Ar-Pharazôn's victory over Sauron
2953 - Last meeting of the White Council. Fengel, fifteenth king of Rohan, dies. His son Thengel returns to Rohan to succeed him.
2956 - Aragorn first meets Gandalf the Grey
2957-2980 - Aragorn as Thorongil serves in the armies of King Thengel of Rohan, and Steward Ecthelion II of Gondor
September 22, 2968 - Frodo Baggins is born
2978 - Birth of Boromir
2980 - Arwen pledges her hand in marriage to Aragorn; Frodo Baggins loses both of his parents in a boating accident; Aragorn, in the service of the Steward of Gondor Ecthelion II leads a taskforce south and kills the Captain of the Haven, ruler of Umbar; Samwise Gamgee born;[15] Théoden, son of Thengel, becomes seventeenth king of Rohan after the death of his father.
2982 - Birth of Meriadoc Brandybuck (Merry)
2983 - Birth of Faramir
2989 - Frodo Baggins comes under the guardianship of Bilbo Baggins; a company of Dwarves, led by Balin, try to recolonize Moria
2990 - Birth of Peregrin Took (Pippin)
2991 - Birth of Éomer
2994 - Balin is killed; the dwarf-colony in Moria is destroyed
2995 - Birth of Éowyn
3001 - Bilbo Baggins turns 111, passes the One Ring on to Frodo Baggins, and leaves the Shire. From now on Aragorn and Gandalf intermittently hunt Gollum
3002 - Lalia Clayhanger, the matriarch of the Took clan, dies, aged 119, and possibly pushed by Pearl Took;[16] Bilbo settles in Rivendell
3007 - Gilraen, Aragorn II's mother passes away at the age of 100 years
3014 - Saruman begins using his influence to weaken Théoden, king of Rohan
3017 - Gollum is released from Mordor; Aragorn finally tracks him down in the Dead Marshes, and brings him as a captive to King Thranduil's halls in Mirkwood
 

agrajag

Banned
I don't like the idea of film 3 being mostly Sauron/Appendices stuff. This movie is THE HOBBIT and the climax of the films should be stuff from The Hobbit.
 

Edmond Dantès

Dantès the White
I don't like the idea of film 3 being mostly Sauron/Appendices stuff. This movie is THE HOBBIT and the climax of the films should be stuff from The Hobbit.
I'm sure the Battle of the Five Armies will be at the forefront of the narrative and serve as the big climax to the film a la the Battle of the Morannon in ROTK. Peter will milk that battle for all it's worth. The Necro/appendices stuff will probably be dealt with earlier on, then a short foreboding of what's to come via the epilogue with a shot of an incomplete Barad-dûr and a ghostly figure entering it.
 

richiek

steals Justin Bieber DVDs
I agree, although maybe it will be three 2 hour movies, and six hours total isn't really that long.

Then why not make them two 3 hour movies if that's the case? I'm pretty sure Jackson is making three 3 hour Hobbit films, especially considering how much footage Jackson shot.
 

Edmond Dantès

Dantès the White
Then why not make them two 3 hour movies if that's the case? I'm pretty sure Jackson is making three 3 hour Hobbit films.
More revenue with three 2 hour films. Now that Batman and Harry Potter are finished, WB are relying on Tolkien and Superman for the next few years before the inevitable Batman reboot and Justice League film.
 
I was talking to a friend yesterday, and while she's looking forward to this movie (like no one else I know), she is rather worried about Aragorn and whether or not he'll be making an appearance at the end of these Hobbit movies; does anyone know if he'll show up? I don't remember him actually being in The Hobbit, but now that there's going to a third movie, does it increase the chances that he'll be able to shine some light on the narratives right before the LOTR story begins?

Disclaimer: I'm not that versed in Tolkien time-lines, so I dunno if I got that right, :lol
 

Edmond Dantès

Dantès the White
I was talking to a friend yesterday, and while shes looking forward to this movie (like no one else I know), she is rather worried about Aragorn and whether or not he'll be making an appearance at the end of these Hobbit movies; does anyone know if he'll show up? I don't remember him actually being in The Hobbit, but now that there's going to a third movie, does it increase the chances that he'll be able to shine some light on the narratives right before the LOTR story begins?

Disclaimer: I'm not that versed in Tolkien time-lines, so I dunno if I got that right, :lol
If you go by the film timeline, he would be around 27 during The Hobbit and would most probably be in Rivendell at that time. So, a brief nod to his character while Bilbo and co are there is possible. He wouldn't feature heavily, just be in the background.

If you go by Tolkien's actual timeline then he would be 10 and still known as Estel.

Born in TA 2931
Hobbit happens around TA 2941

Whatever happens, Viggo won't be in The Hobbit, a younger actor may be cast, but still a very minor role.


As for the third movie it seems only stuff relevant to The Hobbit will feature and anything post Hobbit, pre LOTR will be omitted.
 

UraMallas

Member
Edmond Dantès;40490508 said:
Whatever happens, Viggo won't be in The Hobbit, a younger actor may be cast, but still a very minor role.

Why is he not in The Hobbit? Is it because he didn't want to be or they just didn't cast him?
 

Loxley

Member
Why is he not in The Hobbit? Is it because he didn't want to be or they just didn't cast him?

Aragorn isn't in the book, and unlike Legolas - who isn't in the book either but can feasibly be added in - there's no real place to add Aragorn where it would make any sense (at least not that I can recall).
 
Between characters aging slowly and characters that basically don't age at all, it's probably not going to be all that clear to the average viewer that the Hobbit takes place 60 years prior to the Fellowship of the Ring if they don't make a special point of it.
 

Loxley

Member
Between characters aging slowly and characters that basically don't age at all, it's probably not going to be all that clear to the average viewer that the Hobbit takes place 60 years prior to the Fellowship of the Ring if they don't make a special point of it.


I think this is part of the reason why they have the opening (potentially prologue) with Frodo and Bilbo (as shown in the trailer), to establish that Bilbo is telling a story from his past, "While I can honestly say I've told you the truth, I may not have told you...everything.".
 

Mr Cola

Brothas With Attitude / The Wrong Brotha to Fuck Wit / Die Brotha Die / Brothas in Paris
I think this is part of the reason why they have the opening (potentially prologue) with Frodo and Bilbo (as shown in the trailer), to establish that Bilbo is telling a story from his past, "While I can honestly say I've told you the truth, I may not have told you...everything.".

I know its only a small part but im particularly looking forward to this, I imagine its one of the first things they penned a few years ago, how to bridge the films for the uninformed cinema goer. That and its great to see that Ian Holm is given full respect as Bilbo, it would have been very easy for them to brush over him somewhat.
 

Loxley

Member
Okay, I'm into this...

hobbitocchiali01l.jpg
hobbitocchiali02.jpg
 

Mr Cola

Brothas With Attitude / The Wrong Brotha to Fuck Wit / Die Brotha Die / Brothas in Paris
no 3d for this cowboy, 2d, 24fps all the way
 
Oh man, those glasses are actually really cool... I hope I can grab a pair; I'll prolly end up seeing it more than once anyway, so why not in 3D?

Edmond Dantès;40517489 said:
2d 24fps, 3d 24fps, 2d 48fps and 3d 48fps for me.

And if I can get a ticket to the London premiere.

Ahh! You'll have to post hella pictures if you manage to get one. Good luck!
 

Edmond Dantès

Dantès the White
Third Hobbit film's production costs unclear
Previously, the budget for the two movies was estimated, probably conservatively, at $500 million. A source says the production cost of the third could run between half and two-thirds as much as one of the other two films thanks to work that's already been done. (Marketing No. 3 will add to the total.) But the final cost is not yet known because the studio is awaiting a full script for the third movie.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/hobbit-movie-news-peter-jackson-lord-rings-trilogy-356696


Off topic: The final post count of this thread is going to look pretty embarrassing for me when it's all said and done. :p
 

Kud Dukan

Member
So they will be doing a few extra weeks of additional filming next June. From everything that has been said, it seems like the majority of the content for this trilogy has already been shot, and they are just going to spread it across three films (with additional scenes) instead of doing it in two.
 

Edmond Dantès

Dantès the White
So they will be doing a few extra weeks of additional filming next June. From everything that has been said, it seems like the majority of the content for this trilogy has already been shot, and they are just going to spread it across three films (with additional scenes) instead of doing it in two.
Pretty much.
 
I hope that forest isnt mirkwood, mirkwood needs to be way more creepy.. almost otherworldly. This was my major complaint with the original 3 movies. shit forests.
 

Edmond Dantès

Dantès the White
I hope that forest isnt mirkwood, mirkwood needs to be way more creepy.. almost otherworldly. This was my major complaint with the original 3 movies. shit forests.
They're probably running from the Wargs in that scene, so a different, more normal forest.

The Bilbo shots are most certainly in Mirkwood though.
 

Mr Cola

Brothas With Attitude / The Wrong Brotha to Fuck Wit / Die Brotha Die / Brothas in Paris
It's a dangerous business, Frodo, going out of your door. You step into the Road, and if you don't keep your feet, there is no knowing where you might be swept off to.
 
I understand what they're getting at but money/time spent per page are meaningless statistics when the movies aren't exactly page for page recreations of the books. Fleshing out the Hobbit to better fit with the Lord of the Rings trilogy was always going to make it significantly longer. Whether or not a third movie has a negative impact or a positive impact, who knows?
 
My excitement for these movies took a big hit with the announcement of an additional film. That said has there been any mention of what additional content they're going to include? If they're attempting to do a bridging film between the story encapsulated in the Hobbit and the beginning of FOTR all will be forgiven. If they're just going to drag out the plot of the Hobbit while interspersing bits from the appendices I will not be pleased in the slightest.
 

Edmond Dantès

Dantès the White
My excitement for these movies took a big hit with the announcement of an additional film. That said has there been any mention of what additional content they're going to include? If they're attempting to do a bridging film between the story encapsulated in the Hobbit and the beginning of FOTR all will be forgiven. If they're just going to drag out the plot of the Hobbit while interspersing bits from the appendices I will not be pleased in the slightest.
The later seems more likely now, rather than a bridge film.
 

Mr Cola

Brothas With Attitude / The Wrong Brotha to Fuck Wit / Die Brotha Die / Brothas in Paris
Rewatched the two towers, that Sam speech at the end :[, its writing and acting like that that gives me hope for the hobbit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom