viciouskillersquirrel
Member
This article I'm reading is fascinating. Apparently, 40% of all mammal species thought to have gone extinct in Australia since European colonisation due to habitat destruction have since been rediscovered. Some of them can be reintroduced to their old environments.
Where conservationists try to find bigger high-profile extinct animals that have died due to hunting, predation or disease (like the thylacine), they tend to fail, so the implication is that we'll get better conservation outcomes if we concentrate on those animals that:
1) Are small
2) Went "extinct" due to habitat destruction
3) Weren't specifically hunted by humans or introduced species
There's a freakonomics article in there somewhere.
One hour to go (I think).
Where conservationists try to find bigger high-profile extinct animals that have died due to hunting, predation or disease (like the thylacine), they tend to fail, so the implication is that we'll get better conservation outcomes if we concentrate on those animals that:
1) Are small
2) Went "extinct" due to habitat destruction
3) Weren't specifically hunted by humans or introduced species
There's a freakonomics article in there somewhere.
One hour to go (I think).