• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2012 Community Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Suikoguy

I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
So the money bomb was a money firecracker?

Eh, this is a SuperPAC, the "Money Bomb" was probably to the candidate's fund. Which is all that should be allowed in the first place :(
 
Hey PD, even Karl Rove agrees that Obama is going to be tough to beat: http://www.rove.com/polling_notes/0000/0202/Polling_News_and_Notes_04_26_12.pdf

RuTni.jpg

Don't know why he ranks AZ as "lean Romney" rather than a tossup if it's a 30-day average, because the only two polls of the state within 30 days of 4/25 were R+2 and O+2. (To say nothing about the veracity of Rasmussen's most recent poll of the state, it was conducted and released well before March 25.)
 

GhaleonEB

Member
Don't know why he ranks AZ as "lean Romney" rather than a tossup if it's a 30-day average, because the only two polls of the state within 30 days of 4/25 were R+2 and O+2. (To say nothing about the veracity of Rasmussen's most recent poll of the state, it was conducted and released well before March 25.)

I'm guessing his model also weights historical voting patterns along with recent polling. I'd put Arizona in Lean GOP myself; I think we've got another cycle or two before it flip. It'll be closer this time around, though.
 
That is such a sad statement on humanity. All this fossil fuel burning is helping melt the polar icecaps . . . WHICH IS AWSOME SO WE CAN DRILL MOAR! I don't expect huge amounts of effects from climate change during my lifetime. But our grandkids are going to look back and say "WTF did you think you were doing?!?" Greed & denial.

The worse thing is that when the shit undeniably hits the fan, the right's response will be "blame can be spread to both sides, but we shouldn't focus on the past. It's time to address where we go from here." just like with the Iraq war lol
 
Washington Capitals Win Over Boston Bruins Spurs Spasm of Racism

As rapidfire as Twitter itself, what started as a moment of a sports euphoria turned decidedly ugly. There were the Washington Capitals beating the Boston Bruins 2-1 in Game 7 and moving on toward the National Hockey League's greatest prize, the Stanley Cup. Before my disbelieving eyes, the Caps' Joel Ward scored the winning overtime goal against last year’s Stanley Cup hero, Tim Thomas. But Ward is a black man, and before you could say “post-racial,” self-identifying Bruin fans tweeted a cascade of ugly invective, with the “N-word” being their epithet of choice.

Tim Thomas is the player who created a sports media firestorm by refusing to join his team and meet with President Obama after the Bruins won the 2012 Stanley Cup. To be clear, I have zero problems with athletes refusing to be part of presidential photo ops, but his political reasons are not irrelevant to what caused last night’s spasm of hate. Thomas is a proud, financial supporter of the Tea Party. He counts Glenn Beck as a hero and once emblazoned the “Don’t Tread on Me” flag on his helmet.

The significance of Ward's goal is that the man he beat, Tim Thomas, has through his thinly veiled racism undermined what should be a glorious revival of hockey in Boston. In turn, he encouraged the revival of an attitude that people wanted to think was out of fashion.
 

markatisu

Member
Hey PD, even Karl Rove agrees that Obama is going to be tough to beat: http://www.rove.com/polling_notes/0000/0202/Polling_News_and_Notes_04_26_12.pdf

RuTni.jpg

LOL that is pretty bad if TX and AZ are only lean Romney, in 2 more cycles I would consider them blue but they still have the demographics to stay solid red

That said I got 2 emails in Spanish from Obama's campaign this morning asking me to help get out the vote and mobilize people who are not yet registered. If Obama can mobilize them the map is going to look ridiculous in Iowa, NC, and AZ
 

Allard

Member
LOL that is pretty bad if TX and AZ are only lean Romney, in 2 more cycles I would consider them blue but they still have the demographics to stay solid red

That said I got 2 emails in Spanish from Obama's campaign this morning asking me to help get out the vote and mobilize people who are not yet registered. If Obama can mobilize them the map is going to look ridiculous in Iowa, NC, and AZ

I'm more surprised by South Carolina being a toss-up damn. And to think how impressed we were at him winning North Carolina in 2008, at that time South Carolina wasn't even showing a glimmer of hope at being won.
 

markatisu

Member
I'm more surprised by South Carolina being a toss-up damn. And to think how impressed we were at him winning North Carolina in 2008, at that time South Carolina wasn't even showing a glimmer of hope at being won.

Yeah people might end up shocked but only because they ignored the latest census results

KY is another one that might turn competitive if enough Hispanics get registered
 

Jackson50

Member
Oh, and Romney wants to tell us all about the emerging threat from the Soviet Union

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2...y-warning-of-soviet-threat.php?ref=fpnewsfeed
“You know, Russia is another example where we give and Russia gets and we get nothing in return,” Prosper said. “The United States abandoned its missile defense sites in Poland and Czechoslovakia, yet Russia does nothing but obstruct us, or efforts in Iran and Syria.”
Like...did they all miss the ending of the Cold War? Strange, considering as GOP likes to say, St. Reagan defeated the Soviets...
Romney has incessantly fulminated on Russia; Rubio also noted his incertitude on the "reset." But he's manifestly mistaken. As exemplified by the New START, Obama has fostered a fairly productive relationship with Russia. He secured overflight permission for cargo flights into Afghanistan. Russia has actually participated in counternarcotic operations in Afghanistan. And they recently approved the use of the Ulyanovsk airport as a hub for the withdrawal of ISAF forces from Afghanistan. Further, and I intended to post on this before your post, he's securing Russian cooperation on the contentious issue of cybersecurity. Has Russia acquiesced on every issue? No. But it's disingenuous to expect total convergence. Romney's criticism is as hollow and fallacious as his other critiques of Obama's foreign policy. Or any policy, for that matter.
I think Jackson50 gave a pretty thorough summary of what the speech was expected to be, and I have precious little motivation to confirm that he was correct.
"I'd wager on it being banal and trite with numerous platitudes interspersed. American exceptionalism is unparalleled. We're the indispensable nation. We need to lead the pack, not follow. I could continue, but we know how stunningly facile it'll prove." I'd say I was accurate. I did not expect an opprobrious partisan attack. Rather, I expected him to affirm his exuberance for American primacy and an aggressive foreign policy; essentially, the banal conventionality of our foreign policy establishment suffused with opposition to multilateralism. The only reason it's garnering adulation is he refrained from the vitriolic, fatuous attacks expected from most Republicans.
 

Measley

Junior Member
I'm more surprised by South Carolina being a toss-up damn. And to think how impressed we were at him winning North Carolina in 2008, at that time South Carolina wasn't even showing a glimmer of hope at being won.

Wow, I didn't even notice South Carolina.

Could you imagine how the GOP would react if Obama swept VA, NC, and SC?
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Party Like It’s 2008: GOP Goes After Obama’s Experience Again

BENJY SARLIN APRIL 26, 2012, 6:12 PM



obama-sweet-home-chicago-cropped-proto-custom_28.jpg





American Crossroads, the Karl Rove-connected big money group, put out its own homage to the “Celebrity” ad this week, trying to persuade young voters — once again — that Obama is a glitzy lightweight.

The RNC, in a similar move, launched an effort to brand Obama as unprepared for office on Thursday. In another throwback to the 2008 election, they used an old clip of Vice President Joe Biden, then a primary rival to Obama, questioning whether he was ready for the White House, and juxtaposed it with a video montage of lousy economic reports. Timing it to coincide with Biden’s speech touting the president’s record on foreign policy, the RNCpaired it with an accompanying Twitter campaign using the hashtag “#StillNotReady.”

Warn voters that a freshman senator is dangerously inexperienced is one thing. Running against an incumbent president with a few military campaigns to his name and Osama bin Laden in the ocean, is another. After all, there’s no one running more experienced at being president than the president himself.

Fred Davis, who created the original “Celebrity” ad, told TPM that he didn’t think the same message could work again in 2012.

“Obviously, I’m flattered that they ran something similar to what we did, but in those days there was no base of knowledge about him,” he said. “The most amazing thing about him was he became president of the United States with no one knowing about him.”

The RNC, however, argues that revisiting the experience angle can work — so long as it connects to the current debate over economy, as Thursday’s video does.

“We and the video are making the point that we were warned in 2008 that he wasn’t ready to be president by many people — including the vice president — and after three and a half years as president they were proven right,” Kirsten Kukowski, a communications official for the RNC, told TPM. “Because he wasn’t ready, the policies he’s put in place in his first term have not turned the economy around and are why he shouldn’t have another term.”

Republican strategist Rick Wilson suggested that the idea of Obama as celebrity candidate could still become a potent source of resentment if the country runs into an unexpected economic or international crisis before the election, making the friendly image of “our buddy Barack, slumming in college bars and auto-tuning the news” look out of touch. Like the RNC, he stressed the key was connecting the “experience” argument directly to today’s economic situation, not to some hypothetical danger ahead.

“If he’d been successful in having the public believe the economy is dramatically improved and been able to keep the promises of millions of green jobs, the experience argument would be weak,” Wilson said. “If the argument is ‘He didn’t and doesn’t have the experience and judgment to make smart economic choices, why trust him again?’ it’s the core question of the campaign.”

Much like 2008, how far the GOP goes with the “experience” angle might come down to Mitt Romney’s eventual vice presidential choice. It’s a lot easier to sell a dull, former OMB director like Rob Portman as the face of this argument than it is a newer star like Marco Rubio, who’s 40 years old and whose stint so far in the Senate is even shorter than Obama’s when he was running.


###################

The Karl Rove commercial is link below.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhXGkeMdOJs&feature=player_embedded
 
Party Like It’s 2008: GOP Goes After Obama’s Experience Again

, making the friendly image of “our buddy Barack, slumming in college bars and auto-tuning the news” look out of touch.

There's is nothing this man could do that Relublicans wouldn't spin. He could close every abortion clinic in the country and pro-life groups would fundraise on the issue saying that he violated their first amendment rights by taking away their protest locations.
 

XMonkey

lacks enthusiasm.
Yes, go after him on experience after he will have been President for 4 years. Please, GOP, keep going down that road.
 

kehs

Banned

I like how they point to the student debt issue. Sounds a little familiar, hasn't someone been talking about that lately?

What do you think would happen if democrats got back majority in house/senate this year and Obama won? Would they fuck it all up again by compromising and being nice or will they have learned their lesson and push full left legislation all the way? (Whichever congressman aren't bought obviously)

I think they'll be too starstruck to say no to his advances.
 

markatisu

Member
Yes, go after him on experience after he will have been President for 4 years. Please, GOP, keep going down that road.

Seriously, I am not even sure how this is even supposed to work. The whole crux of that claim was to scare people that he was not ready for the position.

So now that he has been in it for 4 years and the US did not burn to the ground and crash financially how exactly is the experience issue supposed be argued?
 

Clevinger

Member
Seriously, I am not even sure how this is even supposed to work. The whole crux of that claim was to scare people that he was not ready for the position.

So now that he has been in it for 4 years and the US did not burn to the ground and crash financially how exactly is the experience issue supposed be argued?

Well, it's not like their previously successful claims have anything to do with reality. The media isn't particularly liberal. Republicans are not fiscally responsible. Trickle down economics do not work. Obama is not a socialist, or extremely liberal. etc.

They have a proven track record of saying blatantly untrue things really loud millions of times until it sticks in people's minds. Yeah, it doesn't always work, but when it does it seems to work pretty damn well, unfortunately.
 
Pathetic

In another indication that Republicans will have a hard time eating into the Democrats’ advantage with Hispanic voters, House Speaker John Boehner subtly warned Republicans: There’s no way we can pass a modified version of the DREAM Act now.

“There’s always hope,” Boehner said. “I did talk to Sen. Rubio about his idea, and he gave me some particulars about how this would work. I found it of interest. But the problem with this issue is that we’re operating in a very hostile political environment and to deal with a very difficult issue like this I think it would be difficult at best.”

Republican opposition to the DREAM Act, and their filibuster of DREAM Act legislation in 2010, have hurt the GOP’s standing with Hispanic voters. Mitt Romney and Rubio want to undo some of that damage with a more limited version of the plan, one that would provide legal residency — but not citizenship — to some illegal immigrants who serve in the military.

“Speaker Boehner’s comments show how far Sen. Rubio has to go in trying to gain Republican support for any proposal to help immigrant students,” Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), the No. 3 Senate Democrat, said in a statement. “Sen. Rubio should be commended for trying to advance the conversation, but he is likely to find his party unwilling to abandon its hardline, anti-immigrant stance.”

Boehner’s response also represents a candid admission that his members aren’t on the same page — and suggests Romney et al will have a hard time convincing voters that the GOP writ large is on the right side of this issue.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/04/boehner-to-rubio-dream-on-dude.php?ref=fpblg

I'm not a fan of Rubio's plan overall, but at least he's coming to the table on the issue, and it is a compromise. It's quite a tame plan, and the fact that it couldn't pass in the house is all you need to know about where the GOP is with Hispanics. Hell, it seems like it would be a good idea for Reid to put this to a vote in the senate, have dems support it, and see what happens; if the Senate passes it, the House will simply reject it. Then Obama and dems can truly argue republicans literally don't want to do anything about this issue.
 
Pathetic


http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/04/boehner-to-rubio-dream-on-dude.php?ref=fpblg

I'm not a fan of Rubio's plan overall, but at least he's coming to the table on the issue, and it is a compromise. It's quite a tame plan, and the fact that it couldn't pass in the house is all you need to know about where the GOP is with Hispanics. Hell, it seems like it would be a good idea for Reid to put this to a vote in the senate, have dems support it, and see what happens; if the Senate passes it, the House will simply reject it. Then Obama and dems can truly argue republicans literally don't want to do anything about this issue.
I don't know anything about his mini-dream act but I'd think that Rubio is not the best vessel for such legislation. Every other Latino group gets deported if they arrive here illegally. But if you are Cuban you get welcomed. I bet that disparity kinda irks other Latino nationalities. So getting the hacked-down-mini-dream act from a Cuban might be view as a slap in the face instead of an olive branch.
 

RDreamer

Member
Scott Walker's callin' in the big guns for his campaigning

MADISON (AP) -
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie plans to attend a pair of fundraisers with Wisconsin Republican Gov. Scott Walker on Tuesday in Milwaukee and Green Bay.

Walker's campaign announced the visit in a fundraising email sent to supporters on Thursday. Walker's spokeswoman says more details will be announced next week.

The email calls Walker and Christie "two bold and courageous men" who have "taken on the status quo and have done more to put America back on track than anyone in a generation."
 

kehs

Banned
Instead of citizenship, you get a non-immigrant VISA that allows you to finish college.
I'm not sure why would any undocumented come forward to join that program.

Eh, I could see someone being fed up enough to finish education on the up and up, and just take the higher education elsewhere.

(Which is the opposite of the US needs to be supporting right now.)
 

Chichikov

Member
F1 -> EAD -> H1 -> GC
I don't think an F-1 visa in and by itself make you eligible for adjustment of status (but I wouldn't know for sure, that was not my route).

And anyway, while Rubio didn't specify what type of visa it will be, he was pretty clear that his plan is not a path to citizenship.

p.s.
once you have an EAD, you don't need an H1, go straight to GC, do not collect 200$.
 
I don't think an F-1 visa in and by itself make you eligible for adjustment of status (but I wouldn't know for sure, that was not my route).
I don't think so. Three ways to file AoS: Family based petition, Employer based petition, or Refugee/Asylum seeker. The first and last are obviously not applicable otherwise they wouldn't have been in illegal status. Only viable path is through employer, and employers only hire non-immigrants if they can sponsor their H1b visa.

p.s.
once you have an EAD, you don't need an H1, go straight to GC, do not collect 200$.
That is technically true, but what I meant was the EAD you get for F1-OPT right after college.

In any case, AoS from F1 till GC takes about 9 to 11 years.
 

markatisu

Member
I don't know anything about his mini-dream act but I'd think that Rubio is not the best vessel for such legislation. Every other Latino group gets deported if they arrive here illegally. But if you are Cuban you get welcomed. I bet that disparity kinda irks other Latino nationalities. So getting the hacked-down-mini-dream act from a Cuban might be view as a slap in the face instead of an olive branch.

Ding we have a winner, Mexicans especially hate being told by Cubans anything on immigration. Cubans have always been the odd man out when it comes to dealing with Hispanics, because of their ardent support for the GOP in in earlier decades they basically view themselves as white when it comes to voting. People like to say that guarantees Florida but polling in 2008-2012 shows the younger Cubans do not share the views of their parents since they have A)always had money and B)view Castro as a non-threat therefore killing the entire National Defense/Screw Cuba mindset the GOP lives by.

The GOP is just digging its grave deeper and deeper, though at least attempting to support Rubio's version would give them some wiggling room to make an argument.

To outright reject it is basically delivering them into the hands of the Democrats. I agree with PD (I know I am as shocked as you are) if I were Reid I would ram home a version of immigration reform knowing the GOP would kill it and it would go nowhere. Put the final nail in the coffin and basically guarantee AZ, TX, and other Southern areas that are turning Hispanic at record pace in 2-3 election cycles.
 
So with Texas flipping sometime soon, we're never going to see another Republican President ever? At least they went out with a bang with W.
Texas becoming a toss-up state will definitely put them in a spot when it happens. Running a solid campaign in Texas is expensive as it is.

I'd hesitate to be one of those guys to declare the death of the Republican Party, because at some point they'll probably reshape their agenda/platform/image/etc.

I think they'll go for a more populist economic message, while retaining some elements of social conservatism. Oh sure, they'll budge on gay marriage and immigration, but abortion and gun control, probably not. Conservatism has become more about the culture, anyway. Foreign policy will drive more of a wedge in the party than it does now.

This will probably help them win more states in the Midwest/Northeast to counter the losses in the South. The demographic trends in SC, GA, TX, AZ etc. (as well as states like VA and NC that already went for Obama) are troubling for them.
 
So with Texas flipping sometime soon, we're never going to see another Republican President ever? At least they went out with a bang with W.

The crazy is going to intensify when they lose, so, yeah, I don't see them shifting their message any time soon with how much their base HATES liberals, Dems, and Obama. Depending on how trends go, I'd argue we won't see another Republican president till...2020 or 2024.
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
So with Texas flipping sometime soon, we're never going to see another Republican President ever? At least they went out with a bang with W.

Eventually the Republican party will begin its ascent back to sanity. Eventually. In 2028 I might be able to go into the voting booth and actually feel conflicted over who I want to be president, and I genuinely want that day to come.
 

PantherLotus

Professional Schmuck
But seriously, isn't that the best-named act of all time? Seriously, name a law that would look worse on your resume to be against. The "I think women, children, puppies, and kittens deserve some minimum level of care" act? C'mon fuckers. You look like idiots.
Remember like three months ago when McCain was like "Yeah, if we keep doing this anti-women stuff we're going to lose the woman vote"

WHAT HAPPENED TO THAT?

Also love how that NY Times graphic says "51 votes needed to pass." hahahahahahahahhahahaweherlkgje;lwarnh

e: In fairness, McCain appears to have voted for it, so he gets a pass on this one. Doesn't stop the GOP from being run by dumb fuckers.

Not really related - with Snowe retiring and Lugar and Brown possibly not being in the Senate come January 2013, I expect John Hoeven (ND) to take the helm as the token RINO-but-still-really-conservative member of the Republican caucus.
 
Nothing would be more entertaining than obama winning AZ. What a slap in the face to all the crazy racist/borderline racist assholes like arpaio and gov jan brewer. The tea party will explode into a mess. Hopefully it wont give rise to santorum-like ultra conservative movement.
 

Al-ibn Kermit

Junior Member
Nothing would be more entertaining than obama winning AZ. What a slap in the face to all the crazy racist/borderline racist assholes like arpaio and gov jan brewer. The tea party will explode into a mess. Hopefully it wont give rise to santorum-like ultra conservative movement.

It would split the party, there's no way around it. Probably over half would want to concede something on immigration reform but the rest would be in full Tea Party anarchy mode. I can't imagine how crazy the 2014 midterms will get.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom