Isn't that what this thread is about though? That it potentially does work more than we thought, and that we might need to reconsider that the evidence with which we have provided ourselves is anecdotal?
Frankly, it's incredibly disappointing that the OP's article has made you so upset that you have decided to bring in his own personal situation and personally attack him instead of actually discuss the article. How he addresses his families' bigotry isn't your business.
Him posting this thread and this article is not a personal attack on you (though you may feel like it because it calls your own behaviour out as harmful towards progress). Don't respond like it is. Such fragility!
you don't get to make a flippant post dismissing people's reaction to the election then make a thread about how they're the ones further entrenching racism
so lets be real here. the authors themselves say that deep canvassing isn't easy or all that scalable.
"It's definitely incredibly difficult," says Justin Klecha of SAVE, the LGBT advocacy group in Miami that provided the canvassers for Broockman and Kalla's study. "One is just having the field staff prioritize this work above all else. … You need to build up leaders, and training, and support, which takes time."
Advocates need months to mobilize enough canvassers to meaningfully change votes on a ballot measure. And even then, the intervention may not work on everyone.
also there's this point
But Broockman and Kalla had also added a twist to the experiment. In the survey sent after six weeks, the researchers attempted to destroy any goodwill the canvassers might have sown for trans rights with an anti-trans attack ad. (Ads like these highlight the claim that transgender rights laws will allow predatory males to enter women's bathrooms.)
The results of the six-week survey suggested that the immediate effect of the ad was that it diminished support for a trans-supportive law in both groups. But then at three months, that effect of the ad disappeared for the intervention group — as if they had been vaccinated against prejudice.
so people who have these conversations are easily swayed to the other side by information they receive regardless of it's validity or accuracy. while the study shows that the effect wears off people don't just get one random anti-transgender ad in the mail. they read breitbart. they read the fake facebook news. they follow donald trump on twitter. they're under a constant barrage of news that continually demonizes minorities.
http://www.vox.com/2016/4/7/11380974/reduce-prejudice-science-transgender
i also did discuss the article. it's incredibly disappointing that you didn't read the entire thread before posting.