Deified Data
Banned
Malamar and Noivern are the best of the lot, IMO. My favorite Pokemon designs in a long while. They both have a guaranteed spot in my first party.
And I don't get the whole dictation of what a Pokemon can or can't be.
When did the mega versions of pokemon gen 1 starters get announced?
They look terrible. Especially Blastoise. Charizard is passable.
Some concepts are more justified than others (IMO of course). If we're judging them only by design then yeah Ditto sucks. It's like a toddlers doodle. If we factor in the story behind the design then it works. Ditto looks so bad because it can transform into anything and instantly look better. Ok, that's pretty cool. He looks lame but it makes sense. With Vanillite and evolutions the design intentions are so obvious that it's ridiculousness outweighs the concept. The defenders will say Vanillite is a fallen icicle and snow has piled on top but we all know it was designed to look like an ice cream cone. It's design is so blatant and far fetched that I cannot take it seriously.I think it's foolish to decry new designs based on this and that as not being real or worthy Pokemon when Ditto has existed since the first generation. Yes, I know he has a concept/gimmick behind him. So does Vanillite. It does not improve Ditto's actual design - it is literally a squiggly line with the smiley face of a stick figure.
WTF there's a "Mega" Charizard now? Charizard is already badass enough.
I feel that they look kinda dopey. It is the round eyes. In Gen 1 the eyes were rarely circles.
I've been trying to figure out why I hate all the pokemon from DS/3DS and this is basically it.
They all look like they're the product of Ditto sex.
Last week in a Pokemon Direct. I think they look better in game than in the art.
They're uniformly excellent so far. My favorites are probably Yveltal, Xerneas, Chespin, Gogoat and Talonflame.
Erm what, just by looking at the Kalos starters alone we got different eyes.
Hell if anything, Squirtle, Charmander and Bulbasaur all share the same "wide, concave" eyes. It took Gen 3 to make the mons different in eyes. And no, 2 doesn't count just because Cyndaquil has a case of Brock.
I've been trying to figure out why I hate all the pokemon from DS/3DS and this is basically it.
They all look like they're the product of Ditto sex.
I hate Talonflame's name. That's the only major critique I have of Gen 6.
PSY・S;82107721 said:Quilladin looks much better in 3D.
Chespin's EVO reminds me of Crash Bandicoot for some reason.
Ugh, Dedenne. I wish they'd stop putting Pikachu clones into every generation, Pichu was ok since he was actually related to Pikachu and Plusle & Minun were to show off double battles I guess, but Pachirisu was just useless and Emolga even more so since he looked exactly like Pachirisu but wasn't related in any way.
Not too many I'm in love with yet but at least there haven't been any I especially dislike so far, which is more than I can say for some of Gen 5's 'Mons. Klingklang and Cryogonal didn't even look like they were living things let alone Pokemon
It's based off of a lizard with the same color scheme, red head and all. It's my favorite Pokemon BTW...Druddigon is probably my least favorite Pokemon design of all time. Literally looks like a kid's crayon drawing got turned into an official design.
I'm excited to see what Clauncher evolves into.
Swirlix and Spritzee better evolve into some killers.
Camjo-Z said:Druddigon is probably my least favorite Pokemon design of all time. Literally looks like a kid's crayon drawing got turned into an official design.
Pachirisu isn't unless as it has a high special defence, which surprised me in my Pearl play through and Emolga is going to be uber in sky battle.
It's based off of a lizard with the same color scheme, red head and all. It's my favorite Pokemon BTW...
He's my favourite of the 5th gen!
Emolga is the best electic mouse/small animal though.
Ugh, Dedenne. I wish they'd stop putting Pikachu clones into every generation, Pichu was ok since he was actually related to Pikachu and Plusle & Minun were to show off double battles I guess, but Pachirisu was just useless and Emolga even more so since he looked exactly like Pachirisu but wasn't related in any way.
Not too many I'm in love with yet but at least there haven't been any I especially dislike so far, which is more than I can say for some of Gen 5's 'Mons. Klingklang and Cryogonal didn't even look like they were living things let alone Pokemon, and Druddigon is probably my least favorite Pokemon design of all time. Literally looks like a kid's crayon drawing got turned into an official design.
I'm glad someone likes that thing! Hey, one of my favorites from Gen 5 was Vanilluxe, so clearly nobody need pay attention to what I think looks good.
I'm referring more to the general design. Cute, small electric rodent with black dot eyes, pointy ears, and colored cheeks.
I'm glad someone likes that thing! Hey, one of my favorites from Gen 5 was Vanilluxe, so clearly nobody need pay attention to what I think looks good. Is it really based off a real lizard though? I checked Bulbapedia but didn't see anything.
Oh, by "useless" I didn't actually mean useless in battling, I meant that I didn't understand why they just ripped off Pika's design instead of doing something new. Probably should have made that clearer. Pachirisu is personally my favorite of the bunch.
The problem is I want a Chespin, but I also want a Bulbasaur... Help me, Gaf! I don't want to keep using Charizard. Maybe a Blastoise? Definitely. Thanks for doing nothing, Gaf!
Y'alls are crazy, why would you even mess with keeping the Gen 1 starter on your main team? I want some new Pokemon, yo. I'll level up the Squirtle later to get Mega Blastoise, but definitely not for the main story.