Because the original topic of the conversation was:
And the argument in support of the assertion is:
Which then implies that Microsoft's MAIN CONCERN with the Xbox One is remaining relevant enough for third party indie and Japanese game developers to continue to support it.
The counter-argument is that the titles being brought up as evidence:
Are not significant enough to cause such concern.
The games are not being discounted. The argument surrounds these titles being used as the example in support of the basic argument that Microsoft's main concern with the Xbox One is that they're losing titles like DOA Extreme 3 to PS4.
Yes, this is the main argument that started this whole debate (and what i responded to).
And no, I'm fairly certain it's not MS' main concern for the reasons stated (cosmic covered all of the points I was going to make as to why they (MS) shouldn't be, and probably aren't, concerned).