• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Disney pulls Maui costume

Status
Not open for further replies.

atr0cious

Member
Lmao, in what world would a word with so much historical baggage and hurt attached to it be sanely considered as "not objectively offensive," let alone be comparable to an innocuous kid's costume?

1964?

Are we really gonna act like this country doesn't have an issue with not saying nigger? They spent the entire day talking about Don King's "n-word" slip.
 
I really lack the understanding needed to form an opinion on it. But hey, if pacific islanders complained about it, I don't see what the harm is in taking it off the market.
This piece of merchandise from the movie is pulled at a total loss to the manufacturer. Licensing deals dry up slightly because licencors fear a backlash as a liability. Disney determines that a non-white lead isn't as marketable, confirming a biased interpretation of data where Tiana doesn't sell as well as Snow White or whoever.

The next Disney feature film that relies on the main main characters being a vehicle for the true profits in billions of dollars worth of merchandising are whitewashed into a white candy girl, a bunny cop, or anything that doesn't have a direct connection to a real world culture that isn't white.
 
United States circa not that long ago?

1964?

Are we really gonna act like this country doesn't have an issue with not saying nigger? They spent the entire day talking about Don King's "n-word" slip.



And we strived to fix that for a reason. We're not in that era anymore. There's a difference between reverting back to what your'e suggesting, and not wanting to erase any and everything, every time anyone has a bad feeling or hissy-fit.

Having an issue still with the N-word where some people still use it in a hurtful manner =/= it's not considered objectively offensive as a whole.
 

Monocle

Member
Seems like a pretty idiotic controversy tbh. Exactly the kind of case someone would point to as an example of PC overreach.
 

tinders

Member
Good. Next thing on the agenda should be a ban on selling football jerseys for national teams other than your own. I am offended each time I see some POC wearing my countries' colors and appropriating my flag without understanding the history behind it.

I'd go further than that, and outright ban international competition of any kind.

Last time I went to the soccer, I was accused of being racist because I was cheering for my team (Australia), and not Japan.
 
Damn..the concern for kids in here is melting my heart right now.

sdtrs.gif
 
Can we just agree that there's "I find this offensive" and then there's "objectively offensive"? And that just because someone is genuinely, truly offended by something, it doesn't mean that said thing is an objectively offensive thing? Some Polynesians have stated that they're offended by this. That's a shame, and I don't doubt the validity of how they feel on a personal level, but it's a bit hard for me to take this seriously when the whole scenario was enveloped with SJW shit-stirring to begin with.

So you can only muster a fuck to give for the Polynesians offended by a appropriating costume if SJWs didn't (maybe) point it out first.

giphy.gif
 

atr0cious

Member
Seems like a pretty idiotic controversy tbh. Exactly the kind of case someone would point to as an example of PC overreach.

Are you saying this because you don't know or care about polynesian culture? Seems if this was a zulu outfit with black skin, no one would have a problem saying its racist. But its a little lighter and voiced by the rock, so who cares?
 

Complistic

Member
Yeah I don't understand the people who shame these types of things out of existence. Do they think that by boycotting, etc, that they're gonna change society? Like I get having sensitivity about certain issues, but after they kick and scream, then what? What is accomplished?

They feel their existence is validated again for a little while.
 

Alucrid

Banned
This piece of merchandise from the movie is pulled at a total loss to the manufacturer. Licensing deals dry up slightly because licencors fear a backlash as a liability. Disney determines that a non-white lead isn't as marketable, confirming a biased interpretation of data where Tiana doesn't sell as well as Snow White or whoever.

The next Disney feature film that relies on the main main characters being a vehicle for the true profits in billions of dollars worth of merchandising are whitewashed into a white candy girl, a bunny cop, or anything that doesn't have a direct connection to a real world culture that isn't white.

we had the princess and the frog, lilo and stitch, pocahontas, mulan, and whatever else i missed because i don't watch disney movies. if they found minorities to be greatly unprofitable and not worth making movies about they probably wouldn't have made this one. this costume isn't going to be the final nail in the coffin for minority leads.
 

Hypnotoad

Member
If you're a white guy dressing up as a Polynesian, or any other race, then it's racist. Which is a shame because Disney's done a good job on the movie otherwise hiring Polynesian actors and doing research on the culture and all that. Honestly, do you know what blackface is?

I went to Disney Resort Shanghai last week, saw Chinese kids dressing up as white Disney princesses. They seemed happy. Too bad I didn't tell they parents how racists they are.
 

atr0cious

Member
I went to Disney Resort Shanghai last week, saw Chinese kids dressing up as white Disney princesses. They seemed happy. Too bad I didn't tell they parents how racists they are.

Does the shanghai resort add skin colored sleeves to the princess costumes? I was at CA disneyland, and they hadn't gotten that shipment in. And if they did, yes that would be racist.
 
Child please. Turn on the fucking news.

Where did I say things are 100% taken care of and rectified?

So you can only muster a fuck to give for the Polynesians offended by a appropriating costume if SJWs didn't (maybe) point it out first.

OK.

Things don't happen in a vacuum. Context and bandwagonning are thing. Shifting trends are a thing. And these all align.

But let's ignore all that and continue to have an outrage party.
 

Loudninja

Member
I went to Disney Resort Shanghai last week, saw Chinese kids dressing up as white Disney princesses. They seemed happy. Too bad I didn't tell they parents how racists they are.
Do you understand the issues people are having with the costume or the movie?
 

atr0cious

Member
Where did I say things are 100% taken care of and rectified?



Things don't happen in a vacuum. Context and bandwagonning are thing. Shifting trends are a thing. And these all align.

"We fixed it. We're in a different era."

Nope. Wrong. Still largely segregated. Still largely targeted. Still largely forgotten. Only thing different is media is showing it to the world.
 
"We fixed it. We're in a different era."

Nope. Wrong. Still largely segregated. Still largely targeted. Still largely forgotten. Only thing different is media is showing it to the world.

Are you seriously suggesting that us having the glaring social problems that we have today put us socially on the same exact level, environment and social climate as the era where Jim Crow laws were still a thing? That zero progress towards good has taken place?
 
I went to Disney Resort Shanghai last week, saw Chinese kids dressing up as white Disney princesses. They seemed happy. Too bad I didn't tell they parents how racists they are.

You understand the difference between wearing a dress and wearing a literally skin tone eh?

That's rhetorical I know you don't
 

Hypron

Member
Are you saying this because you don't know or care about polynesian culture? Seems if this was a zulu outfit with black skin, no one would have a problem saying its racist. But its a little lighter and voiced by the rock, so who cares?

Looking at the blackface threads... Some people would still have no issues with it. But this thread would be a graveyard.
 

Derwind

Member
You understand the difference between wearing a dress and wearing a literally skin tone eh?

That's rhetorical I know you don't

I always wondered why my niece wore a full body white girl suit before putting on her Halloween dress.

Makes sense now, just getting into character.
 

Hazmat

Member
Well, now fewer American kids will take an interest in what the costume represents and will...learn a lesson about cultural appropriation? Or they'll keep idolizing white characters and studios have yet another reason to only make movies with and about white people. Whatever, some people on the internet feel better.
 

Maxinas

Member
Wait so what's the problem here exactly? Do people not want colored people costumes, or do people not want white people to dress in colored people costumes?
 

USC-fan

Banned
I just hope this will not stop them from putting movies out like this in the future.

It understandable they invest $100's of million into these franchises and don't want to gamble on the backlash that might happen.
 

atr0cious

Member
Are you seriously suggesting that us having the glaring social problems that we have today put us socially on the same exact level, environment and social climate as the era where Jim Crow laws were still a thing? That zero progress towards good has taken place?

Progressive liberal beacon Berekley, CA regularly and aggressively redistricts county lines to keep money in and the poors out. Oakland has a full-time committee that literally just raises funds for lawyers to fight it. The rules have changed, but the shit is the same. Now they call us thug, and get popular blacks to talk down on us and tell us how much better we should be.

Yes people are getting out, and yes, through sheer force, we have cracked our foot into doors, but we're still severely underrepresented in almost every industry but the private prisons. We have an active 1/3rd of the government fighting to destroy everything we've fought for. And now they're renormalizing white nationalism.

But again, all this is to say that you should just shut up when someone says something is offensive. You have no right to say otherwise, no one does, until generations from now when we might be on an actual level societal playing field.

Again, what world you live in must suck.

We have an openly racist presidential candidate. What world do you live in?
 
At first I thought this seemed ridiculous, and in line with the other vague "cultural appropriation" complaints about Halloween costumes. Then I saw the costume. Brown skin suits are not a good look.
 

Not

Banned
Things don't happen in a vacuum. Context and bandwagonning are thing. Shifting trends are a thing. And these all align.

But let's ignore all that and continue to have an outrage party.

Okay, look, do you know who the terms "outrage culture" and "SJWs" as a blanket pejorative for people who criticize the policies of straight white men were perpetuated by?

Ding ding! White men. Us. Aka the "Mr. Know-It-All" of cultural groups. Aka, the ones who think people should "stop complaining, because from my glorious, venerated perspective, things aren't that bad."

Shut up and listen to the people complaining, especially if you don't look like them. You have no idea how they're treated from day to day. You DO NOT NOTICE the seven people rushing under you with rickshaws full of hay whenever you fall off a cliff, just because of what you look like.

LISTEN. Give the benefit of the doubt for once. Don't just push things away because you don't fall under the umbrella of the affected, and don't wave actual criticism of things away with cries of "censorship," "PC," "SJW," "outrage," "safe spaces," and above all "NOT A BIG DEAL." You only betray the infuriating and bewildering shallowness of your own personal perspective.
 

Hypnotoad

Member
Does the shanghai resort add skin colored sleeves to the princess costumes? I was at CA disneyland, and they hadn't gotten that shipment in. And if they did, yes that would be racist.

I would have too check on that next time, since I didn't go into the Disney store, just went there for the Lego store. But a quick look at different websites selling costumes, I can see that they choose child models with really white skin to advertise them. There are Elsa (well, that character from Frozen, I think that's her name) costumes too, with white wigs.

Chinese sure do love white skin.
 

Cagey

Banned
Wait so what's the problem here exactly? Do people not want colored people costumes, or do people not want white people to dress in colored people costumes?

A costume of "tattoo patterns on human skin" needed, well, skin, and skin has a color. To solve that little problem, Disney picked a color of human skin, and the color was the color of the character whose costume it is. That character is Polynesian, thus non-white, and thus an association with an ugly history of wearing other cultures/races as a costume.

Good number of Jersey Italian-Americans have that skintone but, you know, that doesn't matter much since there tends to be a reflexive thought of whiteness as pretty damn pale.
 

Hypnotoad

Member
You understand the difference between wearing a dress and wearing a literally skin tone eh?

That's rhetorical I know you don't

I know what the difference is, I am not that stupid. But I don't see how it is automatically racist. As a kid, we used to dress up as Indians for Fasching too, usually as the "good guys" against the evil cowboys. Some kids painted their skin a bit as part of the attire. There was no bad intent, and the concept of race didn't factor into it.
 

AlteredBeast

Fork 'em, Sparky!
No-one's complaining about Moana's costume, so you can keep your straw man argument to yourself.

Just wait a minute. The movie's not out yet. Someone will complain. It is like rule whatever about the internet about there being a porn version of anything.

If it exists on the internet, someone will complain about it.
 
Progressive liberal beacon Berekley, CA regularly and aggressively redistricts county lines to keep money in and the poors out. Oakland has a full-time committee that literally just raises funds for lawyers to fight it. The rules have changed, but the shit is the same. Now they call us thug, and get popular blacks to talk down on us and tell us how much better we should be.

Yes people are getting out, and yes, through sheer force, we have cracked our foot into doors, but we're still severely underrepresented in almost every industry but the private prisons. We have an active 1/3rd of the government fighting to destroy everything we've fought for. And now they're renormalizing white nationalism.

But again, all this is to say that you should just shut up when someone says something is offensive. You have no right to say otherwise, no one does, until generations from now when we might be on an actual level societal playing field.



We have an openly racist presidential candidate. What world do you live in?

Yes, we have undeniable issues. And things are pretty heated (and I guess have been brewing for a while). In some ways it's good that it's finally exploding as it's all over media now, and it's become at least a national conversation, and people are talking.

With that said, not all instances of feeling offended carry the same weight. Where do you draw the line? You don't get to say "I'm offended" and then expect for that phrase to act as an end-all, be-all to anything and everything. All this mentality does is cheapen legitimate causes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom