gutter_trash
Banned
is it possible that Rinse Pubus is hiding Mike Pence inside a box of darkness out of the loop or is Mike Pence complicit by just being Veep?
Not sure if posted yet.
is it possible that Rinse Pubus is hiding Mike Pence inside a box of darkness out of the loop or is Mike Pence complicit by just being Veep?
Not sure if posted yet.
Not sure if posted yet.
I certainly don't expect Trump to be impeached, but if he were I would hope it could break the confidence of the GOP voter base and force some serious introspection.
They barely won this one and that was when Hillary was the one under investigation. If anything the crowds at the townhalls have the majority of them shook..... and this Trump stuff isn't helping their cause
NEVER. HEARD. OF. CARTER. PAGE?
WTF man. Like, try... a little. Just a little.
why not
you just saw them trying to evade the topic, what makes you think they will change this behavior just because there is actual evidence
why are you assuming the gop would behave ethically
is it possible that Rinse Pubus is hiding Mike Pence inside a box of darkness out of the loop or is Mike Pence complicit by just being Veep?
I certainly don't expect Trump to be impeached, but if he were I would hope it could break the confidence of the GOP voter base and force some serious introspection.
Nunes apparently co-owns a wine vineyard with a Russian extremely close to Putin.
At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if the entire GOP is compromised.
Nunes apparently co-owns a wine vineyard with a Russian extremely close to Putin.
At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if the entire GOP is compromised.
why not
you just saw them trying to evade the topic, what makes you think they will change this behavior just because there is actual evidence
why are you assuming the gop would behave ethically
I certainly don't expect Trump to be impeached, but if he were I would hope it could break the confidence of the GOP voter base and force some serious introspection.
Anyone got a summary of today's news?
because after evidence and proof is presented if they did not act they would kinda be committing treason as well.
RT is funded by the Russian state. US cable news is funded by major US conglomerates. You think one is biased and the other is free from bias?
I don't think it'd be treason for congress?
but anyway I could easily see them kicking the issue ahead and waiting until 2021 to impeach Trump, once he is in his second term and thus no longer re-electable
Lmao rep. Peter king on CNN right now blaming Obama for everything.
What a pos
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
I still believe they only need to prove collusion with Russia for one or more people in the Trump campaign.
These aren't hardened criminals. When faced with a lifetime in prison they will rat out the rest in exchange for a deal.
Just like Watergate you nail the people at the bottom and it will start implicating more and more people higher up to save their own ass.
I still believe they only need to prove collusion with Russia for one or more people in the Trump campaign.
These aren't hardened criminals. When faced with a lifetime in prison they will rat out the rest in exchange for a deal.
Just like Watergate you nail the people at the bottom and it will start implicating more and more people higher up to save their own ass.
He would not get a 2nd term at that point. Regardless of anything. Honestly after this he wouldnt get a 2nd term even if there wasnt any evidence. He is tainted forever. There is too much Trump russia stuff that Republicans will be running away from Trump as fast as possible.
Lmao rep. Peter king on CNN right now blaming Obama for everything.
What a pos
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
So I'm a bit confused with regards to the FBI and the committee investigations.
Does the news about the FBI conducting a full-fledged investigation mean that the bipartisan committee's work is basically done? As in, the FBI has gone public and is now taking the reigns?
Also, when there is a call for an independent investigator.... what is the difference between that and the FBI? Who would have what powers or be working with who if an "independent" investigator was brought in to take things over?
Nunes's remarks today are deeply, deeply concerning when it comes to the ability of a bipartisan committee to "follow the evidence where it leads." This isn't a political issue anymore.
Typical Peter King.
Thought you were exaggerating. Literally thinks Putin and Obama are BFF's
I still believe they only need to prove collusion with Russia for one or more people in the Trump campaign.
These aren't hardened criminals. When faced with a lifetime in prison they will rat out the rest in exchange for a deal.
Just like Watergate you nail the people at the bottom and it will start implicating more and more people higher up to save their own ass.
A independent or special prosecutor would be assigned by the AG (or in this case, deputy AG since Sessions has recused himself). This investigation would differ from a FBI investigation in that it could basically go wherever the information leads, does not have to report to anybody, and would have subpoena power.
This is kind of what I'm suspecting is going to happen too, especially now that it's out there that the feds are investigating all of this. People will start ratting in order to save their own skins.
They just need to figure out who the Lau is in the GOP
The House and Senate investigations will continue. Keep in mind that their investigations don't necessarily have to include criminal actions. They are free to come to their own decisions regardless of illegalities or lack thereof. For example, they could decide that even though the evidence is not sufficient for a trial, it could be sufficient for impeachment. This is unlikely though given who's in charge in Congress.
A independent or special prosecutor would be assigned by the AG (or in this case, deputy AG since Sessions has recused himself). This investigation would differ from a FBI investigation in that it could basically go wherever the information leads, does not have to report to anybody, and would have subpoena power.
It's already happened with JD Gordon. Which I don't think was mentioned in the hearing?
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/jd-gordon-trump-adviser-ukraine-rnc-2017-3
I think it's inevitable.
It's already happened with JD Gordon. Which I don't think was mentioned in the hearing?
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/jd-gordon-trump-adviser-ukraine-rnc-2017-3
I think it's inevitable.
That's still the guy that Trump brought back after Obama let him go right? So I don't see that happening.
OK so we're looking at sort of the... second best possible outcome right now? It's good that the FBI is involved but there is still room for improvement in the form of an independent investigator?
Is there any chance that that actually happens? I know that Schiff was pushing hard for that, but with how divided things are, it's hard to see a Democrat's wishes alone steering things.
It's already happened with JD Gordon. Which I don't think was mentioned in the hearing?
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/jd-gordon-trump-adviser-ukraine-rnc-2017-3
I think it's inevitable.
Oh and hoooooly shit at the twitter situation.
Six tweets in a row from the @POTUS account, all about how "THIS IS NOTHING!"
Zero from Trump since earlier. He clearly has had the phone taken away for the day.
It's so obvious how fucking real all of this stuff is.
Oh and hoooooly shit at the twitter situation.
Six tweets in a row from the @POTUS account, all about how "THIS IS NOTHING!"
Zero from Trump since earlier. He clearly has had the phone taken away for the day.
It's so obvious how fucking real all of this stuff is.
Oh and hoooooly shit at the twitter situation.
Six tweets in a row from the @POTUS account, all about how "THIS IS NOTHING!"
Zero from Trump since earlier. He clearly has had the phone taken away for the day.
It's so obvious how fucking real all of this stuff is.
And there is no bigger rat than Roger Stone. He's the easiest to nail judging by the trail of self-incriminating shit he has done/said. Take this guy in for questioning and he will ratfuck evetyone. In fact he proudly calls himself a ratfucker.I still believe they only need to prove collusion with Russia for one or more people in the Trump campaign.
These aren't hardened criminals. When faced with a lifetime in prison they will rat out the rest in exchange for a deal.
Just like Watergate you nail the people at the bottom and they will start implicating more and more people higher up to save their own ass.