GitarooMan
Member
That's what everyone wants to know. I suspect it's some custom chip and we may have to wait until launch for benchmarks. I'd really like to know more sooner.What's the gpu
That's what everyone wants to know. I suspect it's some custom chip and we may have to wait until launch for benchmarks. I'd really like to know more sooner.What's the gpu
I don't think it's unreasonable to expect it cost less than the MacBook if it didn't have a pen or touch screen.
At three and a half pounds, the Surface Book feels heavier than I expected. But then I remembered it's been a while since I've reviewed a Windows laptop like this. Most of the Windows notebooks that cross my desk these days compete on thinness and lightness, sometimes at the expense of performance. Microsoft is taking a different approach: the Surface Book is as well built as any MacBook, and claims to be as powerful too, but the tradeoff is that it's also about as heavy as a MacBook Pro. If you compare it to the Dell XPS 13 or Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro you might be disappointed by its heft, but then, you'd also me putting it in the completely wrong class of product.
Before I get to performance, though, I do want to linger on the design. The Surface Book is gorgeous. Solid. Yes, its aluminum design and blunt edges bear some similarity to the MacBook Pro, but it still feels every bit worth its $1,499 price tag. It belongs in a small echelon of truly premium, luxurious-feeling computers, with the MBP and even the Chromebook Pixel making for some good company.
You're probably wondering about the keyboard. It's okay. In my quick demo, I didn't exactly make a lot of typos, but the buttons felt a tad sticky, meaning they didn't bounce back quite the way I would have expected, given how much travel they have. Only time (and a full review period) will tell if this is really what it's like to use the keyboard, and if it's something one can get used to. If you want my first impression, though, I felt myself typing a little more gingerly than I would have expected, considering how pillowy the buttons are, and considering how sturdy the underlying metal frame is.
Like the Google Pixel, the Surface Book has an oddly sized display (13.5 inches in this case) that's a little taller than you're probably used to. This was deliberate: In tablet mode, Microsoft wanted it to have the same "paper pad" shape as the Surface Pro 3 and new Surface Pro 4. The resolution is 3,000 x 2,000, amounting to an impressive 227 pixels per inch. It's as crisp and vibrant as you'd expect on a device that costs $1,400 and can double as a tablet.
Well, "most" of that computer, I should say: The tablet itself is home to the sixth-generation Core CPU and one of two batteries, while the NVIDIA GPU and secondary battery live inside the keyboard base. (Microsoft rates maximum battery life at 12 hours, which would be excellent for a laptop in this class.) I suppose I'd feel even more awed if Microsoft had literally squeezed the MacBook Pro's guts into a 0.3-inch-thick device. Still, this is one of those moments where even I, the seasoned gadget reviewer said to myself, "It's amazing what you can do with technology these days." It really is.
I did get to see the Surface Book in action, by the way. It was powering two 4K displays and handling 3D models in the Siemens NX design app like a champ. This is, of course, the reason we revisit devices in full reviews: to put gadgets through their paces in real-world use. That said, what I saw today bodes very well.
I'm asking for a laptop without a tablet.It needs a touchscreen, because it's still a tablet.
Maybe next year they have a surface laptop that doesn't have a touchscreen (and can't detach from the base)?
So... Is the 50% faster than Macbook Pro claim based on the base models of both? Or the top of the line? Or is it just a processor-to-processor comparison? I'd assume they compared the base models, but the Discrete GPS being an add-on makes me question that.
(I'm not doubting the speed difference, Skylake alone could account for that, but I do want to know what models they're talking about)
I'm asking for a laptop without a tablet.
It's probably comparing the dgpu to the Intel iris.So... Is the 50% faster than Macbook Pro claim based on the base models of both? Or the top of the line? Or is it just a processor-to-processor comparison? I'd assume they compared the base models, but the Discrete GPS being an add-on makes me question that.
(I'm not doubting the speed difference, Skylake alone could account for that, but I do want to know what models they're talking about)
Geforce GPU... verrryyyy descriptive.
So what exactly are you getting with the based i5 model... does that come with the battery and GPU inside the keyboard also?
So what exactly are you getting with the based i5 model... does that come with the battery and GPU inside the keyboard also?
Never pay attention to those comparisons. They are almost universally very misleading, no matter if they come from Microsoft, Apple or Samsung. Wait for the benchmarks.
It's probably comparing the dgpu to the Intel iris.
Well the 512 version of that is 2699.99 so I imagine $3000.Surface Book
i7 Intel Skylake Processor
Nvidia Geforce GPU
16GB RAM
1TB SSD
So what will this cost?
What's this dhpu thing ? The nvidia gpu in the keyboard ?
I just got sent the fact sheet.
No info on the GPU, but I didn't hear about the on-board memory during the presentation.
It means the tablet part has a CPU and GPU instead of one chip doing both jobs. Meaning it can run some games/apps much better.What's this dhpu thing ? The nvidia gpu in the keyboard ?
Gruber will claim this sucks.
Innovative, attractive design, great performance — I even like the name. Kudos to Microsoft.
Too expensive for me. It's a lot of money for something that isn't the best at any single function. I can see the appeal depending on what the user's specific needs are.
Actually came back to post that and this--😱
Gruber will claim this sucks.
So the base model still has the nvidia gpu in the keyboard?It means the tablet part has a CPU and GPU instead of one chip doing both jobs. Meaning it can run some games/apps much better.
The specs are still a bit unknown though like what GPU.
The first two models have the Intel HG thing, dedicated means the Nvidia GPU.So the base model still has the nvidia gpu in the keyboard?
Talking about yourself in third person is lame.That shows you know nothing about Gruber. He's openly said how much he likes certain Microsoft software and hardware, and he actively hopes for the success of Windows Phone since he sees it as an important third option vs. Android and iOS.
http://daringfireball.net/linked/2015/10/06/surface-book
EDIT: Beaten like the Zune.
So... Is the 50% faster than Macbook Pro claim based on the base models of both? Or the top of the line? Or is it just a processor-to-processor comparison? I'd assume they compared the base models, but the Discrete GPS being an add-on makes me question that.
(I'm not doubting the speed difference, Skylake alone could account for that, but I do want to know what models they're talking about)
How can these (SP4 and SB) not mention cellular modems in the specs. Did the Pro 3 have cellular networking? This has to be missing from the specs correct?