HocusPocus
Member
I blame the porn.
And he'd fuck your wife and you couldn't do anything about it.
These threads always make me wonder why the Internet seems to yearn for the 50s more than any other period. I see these "look/act/dress like don draper" posts everywhere. Nobody wants to be Henry VIII
Women in America enjoy more rights, benefits, and societal privileges than men do for sure, and we do live in a culture that prides itself on the coddling of its women, but I don't think the risk of being beaten down is the best example for why Western women in general live longer and easier lives than men do.This is ridiculous. I'm just amazed that this question even has to be asked. My worldview that men will in general commit more acts of violence than women. And that it would be aimed at more men than women in general.
i want to be a renaissance man. human revolution here we come.
I always see Don Draper as an example of the perfect man. But, he's horribly flawed and actually not a very good person. I guess people don't even watch the show.
Women in America enjoy more rights, benefits, and societal privileges than men do for sure, and we do live in a culture that prides itself on the coddling of its women, but I don't think the risk of being beaten down is the best example for why Western women in general live longer and easier lives than men do.
Yes, women are more likely to be defended and protected when a threat occurs, but at the same time, I can't imagine it being much less stressful for them to go out into a world as the physically weaker sex.
Women in America enjoy more rights, benefits, and societal privileges than men do for sure, and we do live in a culture that prides itself on the coddling of its women, but I don't think the risk of being beaten down is the best example for why Western women in general live longer and easier lives than men do.
Yes, women are more likely to be defended and protected when a threat occurs, but at the same time, I can't imagine it being much less stressful for them to go out into a world as the physically weaker sex.
You are inherently a man in the sense that your biological sex is male, nothing more. Your father was as much a product of his cultural moment as the males of today. As for manual labour = "man's work", that's absurd. Machines' work, perhaps, which might get to the heart of this crisis of masculinity (that is, it's an empty concept to begin with).My father was a man's man and my role model for what it meant to be masculine. He worked on cars in our driveway, fixed anything that broke around the house, and worked more than forty hours a week as a driller in the oilfield; man's work... To this day we don't have a good relationship. It's sad really, because she got so caught up in changing me because she didn't like the environment she grew up in that she pushed me completely away. I am inherently a man, and if you have a problem with that, which is something fundamental that I can't change, then you have a problem with me.
I do hope you're not inferring that this is a good thing. Why be defined by something as arbitrary as a single chromosome yet ignore 45 others? We're far, far more common than we are different; biological sex is a minor delineation of the human population.What I think a man and woman should be and represent are going to be different from the next person, and this is where the problem lies. Good or bad sixty years ago everyone new their role, there were no questions.
This is absurd (disclaimer: I'm a male who likes to communicate and write, walks or catches a bus, has a greater sexual interest in other males, spends some time considering himself in the mirror, enjoys a little gossip... basically I'm the product of the "male decline" of your nightmares). But hey, I'd rather be me than you, man's man who posts on a video game forum. Clinging to outmoded and restrictive (and sexist) notions of what it is to be male must be rather alienating given our present social trajectory. But whatever, I'm not saying you shouldn't be who you want to be. Just know that wanting to model yourself on a father who you perceive as the epitome of masculinity doesn't invalidate more progressive notions of gender held by others.I personally have a problem with the following:
Men who shave any other part of their body besides their face (grooming your junk is okay)
Men who don't know how to change their oil or a tire.
Men who spend more than 10 minutes getting ready to leave the house.
Men who don't know their way around a woman's body.
Men who would rather play the "game" than actually work for a position.
Men who gossip, back-stab, etc.
Are you a man if you don't fit my list? Technically yes, just not manly...
Do you think those places are void of sexual harassment and assault or something? If the men are getting the shit beat out of them, what do you think happens to the women? Do you think they are spared violence? Do you just ignore the prevalence of domestic violence in these areas or what?
Women in America enjoy more rights, benefits, and societal privileges than men do for sure, and we do live in a culture that prides itself on the coddling of its women, but I don't think the risk of being beaten down is the best example for why Western women in general live longer and easier lives than men do.
Yes, women are more likely to be defended and protected when a threat occurs, but at the same time, I can't imagine it being much less stressful for them to go out into a world as the physically weaker sex.
That shit looks uncomfortable.
That shit looks uncomfortable.And he'd fuck your wife and you couldn't do anything about it.
These threads always make me wonder why the Internet seems to yearn for the 50s more than any other period. I see these "look/act/dress like don draper" posts everywhere. Nobody wants to be Henry VIII
You are inherently a man in the sense that your biological sex is male, nothing more. Your father was as much a product of his cultural moment as the males of today. As for manual labour = "man's work", that's absurd. Machines' work, perhaps, which might get to the heart of this crisis of masculinity (that is, it's an empty concept to begin with).
Your mother was right. You have no inherent right to be what you are now (which seems, to put it mildly, unpleasant).
I do hope you're not inferring that this is a good thing. Why be defined by something as arbitrary as a single chromosome yet ignore 45 others? We're far, far more common than we are different; biological sex is a minor delineation of the human population.
This is absurd (disclaimer: I'm a male who likes to communicate and write, walks or catches a bus, has a greater sexual interest in other males, spends some time considering himself in the mirror, enjoys a little gossip... basically I'm the product of the "male decline" of your nightmares). But hey, I'd rather be me than you, man's man who posts on a video game forum. Clinging to outmoded and restrictive (and sexist) notions of what it is to be male must be rather alienating given our present social trajectory. But whatever, I'm not saying you shouldn't be who you want to be. Just know that wanting to model yourself on a father who you perceive as the epitome of masculinity doesn't invalidate more progressive notions of gender held by others.
Edit: I should probably own up to a mild degree of misandry due to bad experiences with single-sex education. Adolescent male culture is just... ugh. I was never physically threatened or the like, but the overwhelming sense of dislocation made it clearer than ever how flawed these concepts are.
I'm sure you can get one made of a nice silk/Lycra mix.That shit looks uncomfortable.
Thanks, I never know after I've finished a long-ish post whether it was worth the effort. My stream-of-consciousness arguments usually end up so incoherent as to only make sense to me.This is a perfect response. Almost took the words right out of my mouth (save the parts about mild misandry (I haven't experienced it) and never being physically threatened (I have)), except you said it better than I would have. <3
Women in America enjoy more rights, benefits, and societal privileges than men do for sure, and we do live in a culture that prides itself on the coddling of its women, but I don't think the risk of being beaten down is the best example for why Western women in general live longer and easier lives than men do.
Yes, women are more likely to be defended and protected when a threat occurs, but at the same time, I can't imagine it being much less stressful for them to go out into a world as the physically weaker sex.
Exalting the 50s as some golden era of men is particularly problematic as it's ultimately holding up as a model a generation of men with PTSD.
Thanks, I never know after I've finished a long-ish post whether it was worth the effort. My stream-of-consciousness arguments usually end up so incoherent as to only make sense to me.
That was stream of consciousness?
I'm impressed, really. When I do a long post, I have to edit and edit and edit until I get the phrasing right-ish. It's probably why I'm not a good off-the-cuff speaker.
Probably more accommodating than certain clothing of today. Trying to run in skinny jeans is the true meaning of suffering (much like being facetious is the best response to suffering).That shit looks uncomfortable.
Being a man, I have learned, is striving for personal integrity regardless of who is looking, while remaining objective in opinion. Aiming to be top shelf, not to be top dog, not striving to be alpha, but a person who is willing to run a mile to gain an inch. This applies to work, family and your personal life.
I personally have a problem with the following:
Men who shave any other part of their body besides their face (grooming your junk is okay)
Men who don't know how to change their oil or a tire.
Men who spend more than 10 minutes getting ready to leave the house.
Men who don't know their way around a woman's body.
Men who would rather play the "game" than actually work for a position.
Men who gossip, back-stab, etc.
Are you a man if you don't fit my list? Technically yes, just not manly...
This is actually why I don't understand the specialized aproach to "violence against women". If you can make that sort of link between the two then how does separating and making a special case of one work to fully address anybody's situation?
Popular images of women as victims in violent crime have probably strayed far from reality. Rather than a mature women attacked by strangers in alley ways, the average female victim is young (often a child), poor, and a passing aquaintance of the attacker. The perpetrator is most likely an older male of the same race, with a past history of violence toward others. Further, women are not the most common victims of violence, most violence is committed by men on other males.
The average victim of violent acts is a male attacked by another male (Ringel, 1997). The only type of violence where women are more frequently victimized than males is sexual assault (Greenfield, 1997).
This; and the fact we promoted the concept of the single mother (who CANNOT mold a boy into a man, regardless of what any feminist or feminism-supporter wants to believe). Many boys lacked a true male role model in their life and suffered for it, instead hearing the Cosmopolitan-like drivel from his mother (and possibly her female circle too).
Well, perhaps it all boils down to them being the weaker sex (physically). It is true though that special attention is given to violence against women. Perhaps there should be an attempt to raise awareness to men's issues. How the hell you do that though I don't know, as violence against men is perpetrated by other men. I'm not sure what approach you would use.
The fact remains though, most acts of violence are against men. This is a fact even stated on studies specifically focused on women.
I'm not trying to downplay the seriousness of those issues when it comes to women, it's just that this is very much a serious issue for men as well, considering they are the ones most effected by it. It is very much an issue that needs to be tackled.
http://www.feministjournal.com/women_as_victims.html
Not trying to suggest that this sentiment is not commendable - but why do we even need a model of what it it is to be a man or woman as distinct from being adult?
This applies more to the young and the old, not man or woman. By realizing that sometimes people get ahead in life regardless of their effort or age is an important lesson that I think many people have a hard time realizing, if ever.
You are inherently a man in the sense that your biological sex is male, nothing more. Your father was as much a product of his cultural moment as the males of today. As for manual labour = "man's work", that's absurd. Machines' work, perhaps, which might get to the heart of this crisis of masculinity (that is, it's an empty concept to begin with).
Your mother was right. You have no inherent right to be what you are now (which seems, to put it mildly, unpleasant).
I do hope you're not inferring that this is a good thing. Why be defined by something as arbitrary as a single chromosome yet ignore 45 others? We're far, far more common than we are different; biological sex is a minor delineation of the human population.
This is absurd (disclaimer: I'm a male who likes to communicate and write, walks or catches a bus, has a greater sexual interest in other males, spends some time considering himself in the mirror, enjoys a little gossip... basically I'm the product of the "male decline" of your nightmares). But hey, I'd rather be me than you, man's man who posts on a video game forum. Clinging to outmoded and restrictive (and sexist) notions of what it is to be male must be rather alienating given our present social trajectory. But whatever, I'm not saying you shouldn't be who you want to be. Just know that wanting to model yourself on a father who you perceive as the epitome of masculinity doesn't invalidate more progressive notions of gender held by others.
Edit: I should probably own up to a mild degree of misandry due to bad experiences with single-sex education. Adolescent male culture is just... ugh. I was never physically threatened or the like, but the overwhelming sense of dislocation made it clearer than ever how flawed these concepts are.
Well this is coming from a christian perspective so I'm sure some will take it with a grain of salt.
1. In relation to our relationships with women one of the huge problems is pornography. It's easy to access, it's free, and the girls are hotter than average girls you meet. It's a huge problem and part of it is societies message that marriage isn't necessary, and a lack of emphasis on long term, committed relationships. Nowadays most people who are together simply "live together" and thus really aren't as committed to each other as possible. This goes hand in hand with a lot of the media's focus on women as "objects". Rarely do we see long-term relationships valued or shown positively. This is also driven in part by our extremely sexual culture. Everything we consume is all about sex.
2. Helicopter parenting. Boys today play videogames as a sort of release. They're not allowed to go explore, run and around crazy and be boys. Similar to that fight club line of a generation raised by women, boys need time to get dirty, to fight, to wrestle, to go on adventures. This goes hand in hand with a education system that is essentially built for girls. So much time is spent sitting down, and being static when boys want to get hands on and dive into things and expend some energy.
I also feel like leadership and involvement is rarely stressed upon men. We've grown into this man-boy culture where men don't move out of the house, (economics is a factor) go out and try to sleep with women, and are simply always focused on their needs. Men historically have always been the breadwinners, but more than that, providers and leaders. Now a days my generation is solely focused on themselves and not on a family of their own, their community or even society at large.
Pretty rambily but some of my basic thoughts on some problems.
Its very simple to fix .
Phase out programs that favor women. They are no longer needed , in schools women are just as capable of men at learning and the majority of gender barriers are broken ( the ones left are ones that men need to break through not women)
After that you need to seperate the boys and girls in the core subjects . There have been many studies showing that boys are better suited at learning diffrent subjects at diffrent times of their lives vs girls. This would benefit both boys and girls. You can put them back together for gym , arts and other classes but the core should be seperated.
Start making strong Role models for young boys.
Look at the harry potter books , one of the biggest role models for young males. You have Ron the bumbling idiot and you have Harry only getting by because of other people. The only one that does well in school is the girl in the book.
This is spread across all forms of media .
Not trying to suggest that this sentiment is not commendable - but why do we even need a model of what it it is to be a man or woman as distinct from being adult?
These threads always make me wonder why the Internet seems to yearn for the 50s more than any other period. I see these "look/act/dress like don draper" posts everywhere. Nobody wants to be Henry VIII
*clip*Edit: I should probably own up to a mild degree of misandry due to bad experiences with single-sex education. Adolescent male culture is just... ugh. I was never physically threatened or the like, but the overwhelming sense of dislocation made it clearer than ever how flawed these concepts are.
One of my daughter's close friends (who is a boy, and supposedly has ADHD) is growing up without a father. He recently bought his first car and has no idea how to maintain it. If I have him come to my house and I give him pointers and show him how to work on it, am I perpetuating gender roles? I want to help the guy out.
Basically I'm honestly asking how do I reach out to a younger guy who might need some direction without blocking the way to gender equality in the process?
Basically I'm honestly asking how do I reach out to a younger guy who might need some direction without blocking the way to gender equality in the process?
Since the 1970s, our culture has rejected the idea that there may be different roles for men and women in the home, in the professional world, or in the church. But the cultural challenge must be seen in its true context - not just a struggle between men and women, but as a struggle with the issue of authority in general. Since the 1960s, there has been a massive change in the way we see and accept authority.
Citizens do not have the same respect for governments authority.
Students do not have the same respect for teachers authority.
Women do not have the same respect for mens authority.
Children do not have the same respect for parental authority.
Employees do not have the same respect for their employers authority.
People do not have the same respect for the polices authority.
Christians no longer have the same respect for church authority.
There are not many who would say that these changes have been good. Generally, people do not feel safer and there is less confidence in the culture. Television and other entertainment get worse and worse. In fact, our society is presently in, and rushing towards, complete anarchy - the state where no authority is accepted, and the only thing that matters is what one wants to do.
It is fair to describe our present moral state as one of anarchy. There is no moral authority in our culture. When it comes to morality, the only thing that matters is what one wants to do. And in a civil sense, many neighborhoods in our nation are given over to anarchy. The governments authority is not accepted in gang-infested portions of our cities. The only thing that matters is what one wants to do.
Our culture, having rejected the idea in a difference in role between men and women, now rejects the idea of any difference between men and women. The driving trends in our culture point towards men who are more like women, and women who are more like men. Styles, clothes, perfumes, and all the rest promote this thought.
The failure of men to lead in the home and in the church, and to lead in the way Jesus would lead, has been a chief cause of the rejection of male authority - and is inexcusable.
I think the demise of men is summed up perfectly by David Guzik:
I think the demise of men is summed up perfectly by David Guzik:
If you're invoking a concept of "men's authority" then you're sexist. There is no such thing. You are wrong, unambiguously.Women do not have the same respect for mens authority.
I think the demise of men is summed up perfectly by David Guzik:
If you're invoking a concept of "men's authority" then you're sexist. There is no such thing. You are wrong, unambiguously.
This didn't even deserve a response.
Pretty shitty authority as well if you ask me. Whisked off to war where millions of them died. His duty as a 'man'. I'm all for women on the front line actually. I remember all that shit about whether women should be on the front line. Get them on the front line.
I think the demise of men is summed up perfectly by David Guzik: