FloydtheFathead
Member
I thought he was earning the job with Harbaugh's hiring? What happened?
Well.. That's interesting..
Texas
I hear you.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
College Football Week 13 - Sparty ain't worried 'bout no clock
- Thread starter Randolph Freelander
- Start date
I thought he was earning the job with Harbaugh's hiring? What happened?
Well.. That's interesting..
Texas
I hear you.
perfectchaos007
Member
The real question is where will Mack Brown be coaching next year
Wow, that's pretty nuts. I'm actually kind of unsure as to why he'd do this. Did he think he'd be overshadowed by new talent coming in that could start the whole year?
Although, this puts us courting Eason into a new light, especially since we just flipped the LSU commit.
perfectchaos007
Member
As bad as this 4-8 season has been, whenever I see the "Miss Me Yet?" meme photo of Mack Brown I cringe hard. I'm glad he's gone from our program, but his shit still lingers.
perfectchaos007
Member
...I don't get it
It's funny because roids.
perfectchaos007
Member
Ohhh I thought he was caught with weed. And besides I assumed it was a dick joke, and roids make yo dick little
timetokill
Banned
Congrats to UCF! Huge get for them.
Eason isn't going there unless UGA goes with a non pro-style offense, and even then he may stick. He's been committed for two years and been to UGA many times. He's been to UF once. He knows and has been responsible for tons of guys coming to UGA, including his good friend and likely future LT, Ben Cleveland. Cleveland has said he's fully committed to UGA regardless of the coach.
Like I said, barring anything crazy, Eason is still UGA bound.
Is it?
How can you tell that he had much to do with Oregon's recent success when the Oregon system is so deeply tied to Kelly and Helfrich?
He seems largely unproven.
I'm not so sure. Us courting Eason so quickly after getting Franks is... actually kind of disrespectful to Franks, so I'm not sure we'd do it without considering it could tick him off.
I'm not saying Florida doesn't want him, I'm saying he's not flipping right now. Florida is his backup plan.
It is disrespectful to Franks, but Eason is a better QB so if he wanted to do an official of course they're going to be okay with that.
timetokill
Banned
It's UCF.
bucknuticus
Member
UNC at 10, dont think a win can put them in the top 4
Totally, I get that. But it seems like a shot in the dark. Which is what UCF needs to do, take a chance on a coordinator.
theprodigy
Member
I dunno I wouldn't be too surprised if Stanford randomly jumped Ohio State.
So, what happens if Florida>Alabama, UNC>Clemson, Stanford>USC?
So, what happens if Florida>Alabama, UNC>Clemson, Stanford>USC?
Wouldn't be random. Stanford would have played one extra game, which is the same reason Ohio State got in last year.
Azwethinkweiz
Member
Doesn't matter. They won't get in over a conference champ.
Azwethinkweiz
Member
Does unc beat Clemson in your scenario? If so, they get in if Stanford loses.
BertramCooper
Banned
Sadly we didn't play Northwestern this year, so there's no way to apply the foolproof transitive property of college football.
Battlezone
Member
So what happens if UNC beats Clemson, and Florida beats Bama (lol), and USC beats Stanford? Who gets in then?
I don't think UNC would jump from tenth to fourth, but I also don't think Clemson or the loser of MSU/Iowa stays in. USC definitely isn't jumping from 20th to 4th. Is it Notre Dame?
I don't think UNC would jump from tenth to fourth, but I also don't think Clemson or the loser of MSU/Iowa stays in. USC definitely isn't jumping from 20th to 4th. Is it Notre Dame?
Shit, it's going to be Notre Dame.
timetokill
Banned
UNC is 10th because they think they have little shot against Clemson.
They could absolutely jump 6 places if they beat Clemson.
If the committee had any respect for UNC they would be above 2 loss teams like FSU. The schedule they had was shit and they lost to a team that lost to Citadel.
I seriously think OSU gets in if UNC wins. The only exception is if UNC beats Clemson very convincingly. Like by 2+ TDs.
UNC doesn't have any strong wins, otherwise, though. OU lost to Texas but has 4 wins vs top 25 teams to make up for it. UNC, if it beats Clemson, just has that win. And I think those FCS games don't sit well
BertramCooper
Banned
UNC is also UNC.
This is Urbz fault.
they wouldn't put us in the top 4 if we won 50-0 on saturday and a bunch of teams in front of us lose. the committee just decided they aren't fucking with us and it was easy to see from the start.
bucknuticus
Member
Jeff long is such a scmuck, dodging questions and what not. Literally no better off than when the magical computers were deciding
theprodigy
Member
at least the computers didn't change up their criteria depending on what they wanted to argue that day
also just because
B1G: 5 (Iowa, Michigan State, Ohio State, Northwestern, Michigan)
SEC: 5 (Alabama, Ole Miss, Florida, LSU, Tennessee)
Big 12: 4 (Oklahoma, TCU, Baylor, Oklahoma State)
Pac-12: 4 (Stanford, Oregon, USC, Utah)
ACC: 3 (Clemson, Florida State, UNC)
AAC: 3 (Houston, Temple, Navy)
Other: 1 (Notre Dame)
they definitely would because the committee can make whatever argument they want to justify their bs.
Just worse-dressed computers, they are.
FloydtheFathead
Member
When in doubt, blame the "Urbz" hmm?
So you're saying that Bama has 2 wins over top 25 teams, with the possibility of a third, while Ohio State only has 1 win over a top 25 team? How is this possible?
at least the computers didn't change up their criteria depending on what they wanted to argue that day
also just because
B1G: 5 (Iowa, Michigan State, Ohio State, Northwestern, Michigan) - Iowa does not get a chance to play OSUn or Michigan, MSUn doesn't get a chance to play NW, Michigan did not play Iowa, OSUn doesn't get a chance to play Iowa or NW, NW didn't play OSUn or Michigan State.
SEC: 5 (Alabama, Ole Miss, Florida, LSU, Tennessee) - Alabama and Florida will play everyone, Ole Miss didn't play against Tennessee, LSU didn't play against Tennessee, and Tennessee didn't play Ole Miss or LSU.
Big 12: 4 (Oklahoma, TCU, Baylor, Oklahoma State) - Everyone plays everyone, but they all played happily winless Kansas.
Pac-12: 4 (Stanford, Oregon, USC, Utah) - Oregon and USC will play everyone, Stanford didn't play against Utah, and Utah didn't play Stanford. Stanford and USC will play twice!
ACC: 3 (Clemson, Florida State, UNC) Clemson will have played both of the other teams, UNC will play Clemson, and FSU has played Clemson
AAC: 3 (Houston, Temple, Navy) - HarrisonFordWhoGivesAShit.gif
Other: 1 (Notre Dame) -
Just looking to see who played the other ranked teams in their conferences.
FloydtheFathead
Member
Fuck that... Dantonio got robbed..
Battlezone
Member
mre said:
Lonestar said:
Man, you guys are defensive as all hell lately.
Purple Cheeto
Member
I honestly felt that the committee gave additional weight to the manner in which Ohio St. won, not just the fact that they won the conference title.
But if UNC wins, we shall see.