LOL. Which game is which? Had the UI not have been different for each gif, I would just assume it was the same game. Fucking next-gen.
I knew the bottom one was Titanfall because you can actually tell what's going on there.
LOL. Which game is which? Had the UI not have been different for each gif, I would just assume it was the same game. Fucking next-gen.
I don't know but if Ryse was on PS4, you guys would love it.
Oh, please. The reason Ryse is getting shit is because of the gameplay, not the visuals. Being on PS4 wouldn't change that.
I would agree that Killzone: Shadow Fall is shaping up to be the most visually impressive launch title on the next gen systems.
For those who say they aren't impressed and that there isn't much of a leap over current gen, well I don't agree with that.
Some people either haven't experience a launch transition or have conveniently chosen to forget the massive step up in visual quality between launch games and software releasing a few years down the line.
Example...
Yeah PS4 is going to be a beast once we see the second and third gen titles from Sony's first party and other more technically proficient developers. Exciting times.
Then why does PS3 owners love Heavy Rain? it's full of QTE. I'm not hating, just curious. And i own both consoles btw...
Graphically it looks great, but Battlefield 4 just looks way better. It's a shame they're releasing at the same time, as I'd have liked to pick this up. One of my friends will be though, so I'll probably just end up playing his if not outright buying it (assuming he convinces me).
Then why does PS3 owners love Heavy Rain? it's full of QTE. I'm not hating, just curious. And i own both consoles btw...
Then why does PS3 owners love Heavy Rain? it's full of QTE. I'm not hating, just curious. And i own both consoles btw...
Sorry if I wasn't clear; I meant graphically Killzone looks better than Battlefield. However overall (gameplay if you will), Battlefield looks better to me.I think on consoles KZ will probably look better
Not in EuropeResistance came out in 2006
Yeah but how could you honestly compare the two games. I keep saying this in every thread thats trying to compare games graphically that it isn't so simple to judge games like these because they are doing different things. Killzone may end up being the more polished game and I think it will but you can't compare what its doing to a game that has 64 players, destructible environments, land and flying vehicles and more than likely larger environments. Those things all take processing power that could be used elsewhere just to make the game look graphically better.I think on consoles KZ will probably look better
Sorry if I wasn't clear; I meant graphically Killzone looks better than Battlefield. However overall (gameplay if you will), Battlefield looks better to me.
Lair looked really awesome leading up to its release, and not just graphics wise. On the flip side, Ryse looks good graphically but looks to be lacking in gameplay. It's not hard to see why one was hyped and the other is not.I keep seeing people compare Ryse to Lair. I remember Lair being the darling of the forum prerelease. There were as many gifs for it as there are Shadowfall now. Hindsight 20/20 and all that.
Single player Killzone sounds a lot better though. I'm a huge sucker for open, multi-objective FPS gameplay. It reminds me of Goldeneye/Perfect Dark, and as long as it's similar, I'll probably love it. I just cannot pass on Battlefield multiplayer though, which puts me in a tough spot.Oh yeah I see what you mean. For me it depends if they get the magic of KZ2's mp back into SF. If not I'm definitely going with BF
I don't know but if Ryse was on PS4, you guys would love it.
I don't know but if Ryse was on PS4, you guys would love it.
I wish I could believe you. Ryse can look really awesome in spots, but gifs of those moments don't float around...instead we get the same old mockery posts. People are finding what they're looking for in these titles.Lair looked really awesome leading up to its release, and not just graphics wise. On the flip side, Ryse looks good graphically but looks to be lacking in gameplay. It's not hard to see why one was hyped and the other is not.
OK, that pretty much confirms you have no idea whatsoever about what you're talking about. Welcome to my ignore list.Low rez textures, weak reflections, some suspect looking shadows, no tessellation, lighting that looks to lack HDR. Etc.
Because Heavy Rain is a completely story driven adventure while Ryse is supposed to be an action game.Then why does PS3 owners love Heavy Rain? it's full of QTE. I'm not hating, just curious. And i own both consoles btw...
Then why does PS3 owners love Heavy Rain? it's full of QTE. I'm not hating, just curious. And i own both consoles btw...
Then why does PS3 owners love Heavy Rain? it's full of QTE. I'm not hating, just curious. And i own both consoles btw...
Looks good, but it is another FPS in a long list at launch. It's not impressive looking enough for me to buy it for graphics.
I'm not even getting a FPS at launch on either console.
Actually ps4 will have all the shooters coming out this holiday season. Including F2P and only exclusive shooter.
Then why does PS3 owners love Heavy Rain? it's full of QTE. I'm not hating, just curious. And i own both consoles btw...
Then why does PS3 owners love Heavy Rain? it's full of QTE. I'm not hating, just curious. And i own both consoles btw...
I don't know but if Ryse was on PS4, you guys would love it.
http://cdn.medialib.oxm.co.uk/screens/dir_350/image_35039.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
Did you see all of the shit Knack and Drive Club got until Gamesom? Just because a game is on PS4 doesn't mean GAF will spare it from criticism.
Real weapons are made of plastic, or material that looks like plastic. Killzone tries to stay grounded so it would only make sense that the guns would look plastic.
I just hope the game is actually good.
I don't know but if Ryse was on PS4, you guys would love it.
no "next gen" game should be 30 fps IMO.