The US is much better equipped at simply addressing these matters. They have an actual vocubalury to address oppressive structures, passive racism, ingrained racist beliefs, the important difference between when a majority power holder (White) says something in contrast to when an oppressed/marginalized minority (Black) does, and so on.
In Europe, the national discourses revolve around Muslims being Brown-colored, "Negro" not being an offensive word because it's always been in our language, saying that a racial slur is offensive and hurtful is equivalent to censorship, and simply doing the act of *talking* about racism in European countries is called racism in itself. In Europe, it is perfectly fine to have a White Dude on a TV show to talk about whether or not a racially problematic topic is acceptable or not. That's the quality of the discourse at the moment.
Sweden is much better at these things. Other places (Denmark, France, Germany, Poland, Netherlands, Switzerland, etc.) are pretty bad at it. They don't even have the vocabulary to put words on what is going on.