This is stupid. If it does all of that, then why Lockhart?
CHEAPER CONSOLES SELL MOREThis is stupid. If it does all of that, then why Lockhart?
That’s just silly. While I would rather no Lockhart, if it is the same architecture with a smaller GPU and some less RAM, it hardly compares to an X360.Is still serves as an anchor.
Why not release Cyberpunk on Xbox 360? Developers have been building PC titles on multiple GPUs for decades.... right?
Oh that's right, because it would never run on the 360 and before long a game will come along that will never run on Lockheart and if a ton of Lockhearts are sold then that new game will get neutered fundamentally.
Tom running Microsoft's PR teams?
Tom running Microsoft's PR teams?
That’s just silly. While I would rather no Lockhart, if it is the same architecture with a smaller GPU and some less RAM, it hardly compares to an X360.
Tom running Microsoft's PR teams?
CHEAPER CONSOLES SELL MORE
11:59 - My source tell me that Lockhart will have sightly slower CPU than Series X
12:00 - My source tell me that Lockhart will have the same CPU speed as Series X
That tweet looks very unprofessional to me. Just read the replies lol, a lot of angry people in there.
Embarrassing by Tom.
Measuring the level of professionalism of a message based on the replies it receives is a terrible idea.
On Twitter? Even worst.
It is. Maybe he's right I don't know. Time will tell. But if Lockhart is doing all of that, then why hide it until some time in August?
Its so blatant.
"Senior Editor at The Verge"... Speaks volumes about the level of integrity at that site.
Except devs have actually been praising gamepass...I've seen Xbox's on sale for under 200 euro here in Ireland... which is insane in what they call 'the rip-off republic'.
Releasing a cheaper Xbox will not move the needle, it results on more dev time being put into a platform that sells the least software and has a subscription service that undermines new releases......
It all comes together to make it the most developer unfriendly platform and I believe developers already are voicing their annoyance.
Lockhart is not weaker, it’s much stronger Than Xbox One X.My comment isn't about comparing Lockheart to the 360.
I'm just pointing out that you can't make ANY game run on ANY hardware. There comes a point where that no longer becomes possible.
Xbox1X is a current gen console and Lockheart will be weaker. Imagine if all PS4 games were forced to also be on the PS3 all gen long. You think that might have a negative imact on what developers could do with games for PS4? Ofcourse it would.
Why would they use such limited GPU resources for Raytracing though?
It's almost certainly one of the game features they will turn off for the XSS version of a game.
CPU is faster than the PS5.
Can MS stop taking shots at Sony, lol.
I mean sure but why is a journalist from a big site trying to start a console war in a tweet. That's terrible journalism and very unprofessional.
I mean it’s just common sense at this point honestly. Graphics scale based on the levels of pixels it needs to render. This scaling is mostly linear. To be honest, I’m pretty sure Lockhart will be a more powerful 1080p console than Series X as a 4K console
Is it realistic to expect 720P titles on Lockheart by generations end?
I think it is a fascinating piece of technology, could be very disruptive and good value for those who dont care about resolution
I tweeted the same reply and got blocked.That's terrible journalism and very unprofessional.