Frozenprince
Banned
Maybe she'll commit suicide from the life-ruining event and online/in-person abuse, if you're lucky.
What the hell is wrong with you?
Maybe she'll commit suicide from the life-ruining event and online/in-person abuse, if you're lucky.
Maybe she'll commit suicide from the life-ruining event and online/in-person abuse, if you're lucky.
I think you should be kicked out of school and/or fired from your job for the racism you display in this post.
Maybe she'll commit suicide from the life-ruining event and online/in-person abuse, if you're lucky.
lol you're losing itNo, I'm sure she would've delighted in owning slaves if given the chance; what else could you possibly take from a snap of a facemask?
Maybe she'll commit suicide from the life-ruining event and online/in-person abuse, if you're lucky.
Their bored and don't want to risk getting their main account banned.What the hell is wrong with you?
Maybe she'll commit suicide from the life-ruining event and online/in-person abuse, if you're lucky.
Witch hunts are scary. Witch hunts against dumb kids on a forum full of supposed adults is terrifying.
I'm glad nobody on GAF has ever made a mistake, nor been given a second chance, otherwise 90% of the posters on this thread would be incredible hypocrites. I would venture that this idiot, upon seeing the reaction to this, will buck up her ideas real quick and learn the lesson you pretend you want her to learn.
Not enough says GAF, ruin her life, they decree.
lol you're losing it
I'm tired of these people being politically correct and going on alts to say how they really feel.
They're weekly now, it's like a barbecue.can we start bring food to these threads
what with them bein annual and all
They're weekly now, it's like a barbecue.
Are you guys not pushing the same extreme opinions?
Did I just get exposed numerous times and have to resort to weird rtheortics?
Echo chamber confirmed
Nope and the Admins are free to verify that, if I get banned for offering a differing opinion in this echo chamber then so be it.
I haven't defended her actions, in fact I've made it pretty clear how stupid I think they were, I just don't think that on a first offence anybody should have their life ruined without having first been given a chance to rethink what led them to it and make amends.
Obviously I'm exercised because the lack of basic mercy and empathy (of having said and done dumb things at age 18, whether race-related or not) from dozens of posters asking for instant expulsion is really depressing.
I'll take you at your word, but I feel like you're getting caught up in a situation out of your control. People are going to do what they want with whoever's reputation in the world of public opinion. It's why celebrities have PR people. You can't control what aspect of your life is revealed to the world. You can't keep everyone's mouths and email accounts shut. She's now a celebrity to whoever reads about her story, and I hope she hires a good PR person and changes course on how she interacts with the world and minorities. We're alive for a very long time, she has many more phases of her life to go, and they can all be positive.Nope and the Admins are free to verify that, if I get banned for offering a differing opinion in this echo chamber then so be it.
I haven't defended her actions, in fact I've made it pretty clear how stupid I think they were, I just don't think that on a first offence anybody should have their life ruined without having first been given a chance to rethink what led them to it and make amends.
Obviously I'm exercised because the lack of basic mercy and empathy (of having said and done dumb things at age 18, whether race-related or not) from dozens of posters asking for instant expulsion is really depressing.
Nope and the Admins are free to verify that, if I get banned for offering a differing opinion in this echo chamber then so be it.
I haven't defended her actions, in fact I've made it pretty clear how stupid I think they were, I just don't think that on a first offence anybody should have their life ruined without having first been given a chance to rethink what led them to it and make amends.
Obviously I'm exercised because the lack of basic mercy and empathy (of having said and done dumb things at age 18, whether race-related or not) from dozens of posters asking for instant expulsion is really depressing.
Everybody knows being called a racist is as bad as being called any other slur.
Obviously.
Nope and the Admins are free to verify that, if I get banned for offering a differing opinion in this echo chamber then so be it.
I haven't defended her actions, in fact I've made it pretty clear how stupid I think they were, I just don't think that on a first offence anybody should have their life ruined without having first been given a chance to rethink what led them to it and make amends.
Obviously I'm exercised because the lack of basic mercy and empathy (of having said and done dumb things at age 18, whether race-related or not) from dozens of posters asking for instant expulsion is really depressing.
Nope and the Admins are free to verify that, if I get banned for offering a differing opinion in this echo chamber then so be it.
I haven't defended her actions, in fact I've made it pretty clear how stupid I think they were, I just don't think that on a first offence anybody should have their life ruined without having first been given a chance to rethink what led them to it and make amends.
Obviously I'm exercised because the lack of basic mercy and empathy (of having said and done dumb things at age 18, whether race-related or not) from dozens of posters asking for instant expulsion is really depressing.
Everybody knows being called a racist is as bad as being called any other slur.
Obviously.
Michael Freeden has argued that a key aspect of conservative ideology is being able to appropriate the values of opposing ideologies in order to protect the conservative's idea of the proper form of society. At the same time that the US switched from de jure (explicitly coded) to de facto (implicitly derived) institutional racism, racists realized that they could protect the institutions of racism by borrowing from the left's growing understanding of identity politics. They saw that the activity of "racism" could be isolated within certain overt behaviours, such as using the word "nigger," and that social discourse was moving away from blanket associations of actions with identities. They saw how the left made it taboo to use racist terms, as a way to shutdown racist discourse.
Racists decided that the best way to deflect public discussion away from de facto systems of racism was to make those discussions taboo, by borrowing the technique of coding certain terms (in this case "racist") as publicly unacceptable. They connected the term "racist" to identity politics by trying to dress it up as a demeaning term in the same way that "nigger" is. As a result, if you call a white person racist for, say, refusing to acknowledge a bias against black people within the criminal justice system, you're unfairly reducing them to a blanket identity which they don't see as their own. They can then center discussions about institutional racism around how it relates to white people and what their experiences are, diminishing the ability for the victims of systemic racism to argue their own cases.
That's a long way to say that it's an intentionally-conceived silencing tactic.
Once again....
comments
dont read them.
just...
sigh.
This is a discussion forum where others communicate and share opinions following the forum rules. You're free to make it clear that you think she should be given a second chance and others are free to say she shouldn't/criticize her actions. Just because your opinion doesn't match with others doesn't mean they are conducting a "witch hunt".
Throw enough of these people out of school and some might start catching on that blackface isn't a cool thing to fuck around with.
I'll agree with you on that at least, avoiding this dogpile is why I don't post. You're probably right about the rest of your reply too I just find it profoundly depressing to see the vitriol, and the way people take things and run with it to make it a bigger deal like suggesting she deliberately "blacked up" with gaffer tape (you can tell how male this forum is) to make a targeted attack on a group of people.
Was this posted to social media by the girl herself, or did this get upped by the receiver of the snap chat message?
This won't make people less racist, on the contrary.
It will just make them repackage their racism in a different way.
I don't see how this would be better in any way.
don't ruin someone's life by kicking them out of school for doing something stupid...kick her off the team, yes, but wouldn't you want someone this ignorant to have more education? isn't that how we fight ignorance?
Maybe she'll commit suicide from the life-ruining event and online/in-person abuse, if you're lucky.
I'll agree with you on that at least, avoiding this dogpile is why I don't post. You're probably right about the rest of your reply too I just find it profoundly depressing to see the vitriol, and the way people take things and run with it to make it a bigger deal like suggesting she deliberately "blacked up" with gaffer tape (you can tell how male this forum is) to make a targeted attack on a group of people.
I'll agree with you on that at least, avoiding this dogpile is why I don't post. You're probably right about the rest of your reply too I just find it profoundly depressing to see the vitriol, and the way people take things and run with it to make it a bigger deal like suggesting she deliberately "blacked up" with gaffer tape (you can tell how male this forum is) to make a targeted attack on a group of people.
don't ruin someone's life by kicking them out of school for doing something stupid...kick her off the team, yes, but wouldn't you want someone this ignorant to have more education? isn't that how we fight ignorance?
I guess this fits here as well:
Thanks for sharing this, this is spot on.Michael Freeden has argued that a key aspect of conservative ideology is being able to appropriate the values of opposing ideologies in order to protect the conservative's idea of the proper form of society. At the same time that the US switched from de jure (explicitly coded) to de facto (implicitly derived) institutional racism, racists realized that they could protect the institutions of racism by borrowing from the left's growing understanding of identity politics. They saw that the activity of "racism" could be isolated within certain overt behaviours, such as using the word "nigger," and that social discourse was moving away from blanket associations of actions with identities. They saw how the left made it taboo to use racist terms, as a way to shutdown racist discourse.
Racists decided that the best way to deflect public discussion away from de facto systems of racism was to make those discussions taboo, by borrowing the technique of coding certain terms (in this case "racist") as publicly unacceptable. They connected the term "racist" to identity politics by trying to dress it up as a demeaning term in the same way that "nigger" is. As a result, if you call a white person racist for, say, refusing to acknowledge a bias against black people within the criminal justice system, you're unfairly reducing them to a blanket identity which they don't see as their own. They can then center discussions about institutional racism around how it relates to white people and what their experiences are, diminishing the ability for the victims of systemic racism to argue their own cases.
That's a long way to say that it's an intentionally-conceived silencing tactic.
kids can't be this fucking stupid
when I was a freshman in college I knew what not to do. It has nothing to with graduating top quarter of my HS, this shit is just dumb.
I'm a black woman. She deliberately did this to make a joke at the expense of black people. But what's worse than that are people running to her defense to infantilize and humanize her in order to shield her from the consequences of her actions, when her offense was the opposite and effectively dehumanized another group of people.
If you care so much about her education, then contact her and have a long conversation about racism instead of putting it off on other people to do it.
She made it herself. Once your Snapchat is out there it is still your responsibility.
don't ruin someone's life by kicking them out of school for doing something stupid...kick her off the team, yes, but wouldn't you want someone this ignorant to have more education? isn't that how we fight ignorance?
It's a marathon, not a sprint. To do nothing isn't a wise social experiment as humanity has an awful track record of auto-correcting itself if it isn't attempted to be funneled, or frankly dragged.
Thats true. But in my opinion education and having to engage with diverse groups are the best ways to fight racism. So cutting her off from getting an education at a university were she will face a diverse group of people will probably have the the opposite of a positive effect.
It would be less about fixing anything than about punishing someone for punishments sake.
Brah she chose to go to hbcu and still acting a fool. College can't fix that kind of stupidThats true. But in my opinion education and having to engage with diverse groups are the best ways to fight racism. So cutting her off from getting an education at a university were she will face a diverse group of people will probably have the the opposite of a positive effect.
It would be less about fixing anything than about punishing someone for punishments sake.
No one is finding a reason, she posted something racist and is being held accountable for it. Calling her a racist isn't the same as dehumanizing a black people because of their race, that's fucking ridiculous.Everyone deserves to be humanised, finding a reason to dehumanise her is no better than her or anyone else dehumanising you.
I certainly wasn't attempting to shield her from consequences, I just don't believe that they should be potentially life-ruining. I can't believe that the options here are as binary as "let her get away with it" and "expel her immediately", a middle ground exists where her ignorance can be challenged, rectified by her and the institution, and some good can come of it.
I wish that idea wasn't so controversial, given that there's good evidence that it produces better outcomes than taking the nuclear option as a first resort.