• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Ghostbusters reboot cast announced - McCarthy, Wiig, Jones, McKinnon

Status
Not open for further replies.

MMaRsu

Banned
Why? What is inherently male about being a ghostbuster, exactly?

There isnt. I just dont think these 4 women would fill the shoes of those classic roles.

This whole movie is going to be hot garbage. It will not have any of the charm and wit the original ghostbusters had.
 

PBY

Banned
From the bits I have read so far it doesn't sound anything like ghostbusters and they are going to really struggle to give it close to the same charm.

No ecto1 or proton packs, no original cast involvement and complete gender swap for no apparent reason other then 'becuase'. Not looking promising so far.
Kinda my point tho. Do they really need to justify the swap beyond "because?" They're still people? If they were 4 black ghostbusters, would they need a "reason"?
 

Ninhead

Member
Can you point me to something where she's not really being weird? I mean she's great but I'm not sure she's a fit for a ghostbuster's movie.

Oh, so kinda like McCarthy?

And for the record, everyone applauding "not casting attractive, skinny model wannabes" can fuck right off. First off, Feig doesn't do that to begin with. Second, it wouldn't make any sense in the supposed context of the movie. And lastly, find an "ensemble" piece that they did that on. Quit being so reactionary. Again, gender and looks aren't in most peoples complaint about this.
 

MMaRsu

Banned
Kinda my point tho. Do they really need to justify the swap beyond "because?" They're still people? If they were 4 black ghostbusters, would they need a "reason"?

4 black ghostbusters would also be bullshit imo. Just try staying close to the freaking source.material
 

PBY

Banned
4 black ghostbusters would also be bullshit imo. Just try staying close to the freaking source.material
Yikes.

Man I didn't realize that a cracking wise bunch of dudes who exterminated ghosts and giant marshmallow men were so sacrosanct.
 

Lucifon

Junior Member
Why? What is inherently male about being a ghostbuster, exactly?

Nothing but the Ghostbusters have always been male... It feels more like a statement making a full female cast of a franchise which has had 4 male leads since the 80s. I struggle to think of a film with full female leads being rebooted into all male leads.
 

Daffy Duck

Member
How much money did bridesmaids make? You think the only people who saw it in the theater were women.

I think you are twisting the way the world works to prop up your point.

No I don't think the only people who saw it cinemas were women, I'm not twisting the way the world works, but there are types of films that appeal more to one gender than others.

I even said in my original post, rightly or wrongly.
 

MMaRsu

Banned
Yikes.

Man I didn't realize that a cracking wise bunch of dudes who exterminated ghosts and giant marshmallow men were so sacrosanct.

I dont see how your so obtuse about people wanting the classics not to be fucked with and rebooted into straight to dvd hell.
 
Oh, so kinda like McCarthy?

And for the record, everyone applauding "not casting attractive, skinny model wannabes" can fuck right off. First off, Feig doesn't do that to begin with. Second, it wouldn't make any sense in the supposed context of the movie. And lastly, find an "ensemble" piece that they did that on. Quit being so reactionary. Again, gender and looks aren't in most peoples complaint about this.

Thank you. The OverreactionGAF is in full force. For the record, if any of you are old enough to remember the cartoon, Janine became a Ghostbuster and I'm sure no one had a problem with it.

Why? Because she was an intregal part of the storyline!!
 

Daffy Duck

Member
Ulitmately time will tell as to how well this does and how good the story actually manages to be and what direction they take it in.
 
Nothing but the Ghostbusters have always been male... It feels more like a statement making a full female cast of a franchise which has had 4 male leads since the 80s. I struggle to think of a film with full female leads being rebooted into all male leads.

Could that possibly be because there's a dearth of female-centric tentpole film franchises in the first place?
 

MMaRsu

Banned
Am I reading this correctly.

Wtf

What? I have nothing against black people MT, i just dont think it would be a right fit.

Or should we also cast five asian guys in the A-Team reboot?

No ofcourse they shouldnt.

MT backseat modding certainly ia bannable.
 

anaron

Member
Nothing but the Ghostbusters have always been male... It feels more like a statement making a full female cast of a franchise which has had 4 male leads since the 80s. I struggle to think of a film with full female leads being rebooted into all male leads.
Yeah, there's just soooooo many to choose from

Oh wait
 

Yrael

Member
Why is that disturbing? It doesnt make much sense, just like it wouldnt make sense to have an all female A-Team

There you have it.

Also, yeah wtf is the target audience for this film

Peterb0y how come you have a hard time understanding that 4 women in the lead role is a whole different ballpark audience wise then the first movies?

Ok then I think your really out of touch. I dont think most males wouldnt watch this film in cinema's. Maybe with their girlfriends, but not with their mates.

I certainly wouldnt go see it

Hah what? You dont know me. No not at all, I love females! I have no iasies with female is big movie roles, its just that I have no interest in seeing 4 women play the roles of ghostbusters.

Lol I guess if you are against this film you are against women ><.

There isnt. I just dont think these 4 women would fill the shoes of those classic roles.

This whole movie is going to be hot garbage. It will not have any of the charm and wit the original ghostbusters had.

4 black ghostbusters would also be bullshit imo. Just try staying close to the freaking source.material

Can you please try to explain why you think women and black lead cast would destroy the film's charm and wit?
 

MThanded

I Was There! Official L Receiver 2/12/2016
What? I have nothing against black people MT, i just dont think it would be a right fit.

Or should we also cast five asian guys in the A-Team reboot?

No ofcourse they shouldnt.

I personally don't consider race when I decide what I'm going to watch. If I did I would have a really issue going to the theater.
 

xenist

Member
Could that possibly be because there's a dearth of female-centric tentpole film franchises in the first place?

No way. There are tons of all female tentpole franchises. I'd give you tons of examples if I could think of any. There's just an inherent anti-male bias in our culture right now. I think it's because of fluoride in the water.
 
This type of stuff isn't bannable?

Not sure what this adds to the discussion.

Bannable? Lol. If this is a reboot, it's safe to say it will re-create a number of memorable scenes… The Dan Aykroyd ghost sex scene is pretty well-known.

And "adding to the discussion?" We're discussing Ghostbusters, not human rights in the Congo.
 

elyetis

Member
I think I recognise one of them from Gilmore Girls, and.. that's all. Doesn't seems like they went for a high paycheck cast.
 
Just because there's an abundance of ancillary fiction in the franchise doesn't mean you can base a new film off of them. You can't expect a mass-market audience to have any knowledge of that stuff. There's a reason the Star Wars Expanded Universe was jettisoned.

I can't figure out why people would want this connected to the originals when the original cast couldn't all get on board. Did people really want Wiig's character to be Venkman's daughter or niece or something dumb like that?

Plenty of reboots and reimaginings change elements of the original stories. Some of it works out, some of it doesn't. This sort of nitpicking is absurdly premature.

Premature nitpicking? These things are UNIVERSAL through ALL versions of Ghostbusters: Ecto 1, Proton Packs. You can upgrade the car, you can upgrade the packs, you can change the model of the car, you can make the pack shoot out something other than protons, but getting rid of those things entirely is fucking ludicrous because they are massive staples to the franchise. Even the video game understood this. The Proton Packs are not mass produced by Apple. They were illegally assembled in a condemned firehouse by evicted college students.

OH THAT REMINDS ME

They're getting rid of the firehouse too.

So this Ghostbusters movie won't have the Ghostbusters characters, it won't have the firehouse, it won't have the car, and they're completely changing the method that they hunt ghosts.

People want it to be connected to the originals even without the whole original cast because there is an enormously rich and untapped world to explore and instead we're getting the exact same origin story again.

And yes I would have much rather someone go into the Real Ghostbusters well to adapt something like the amazing Boogyman arc into a movie over throwing in the towel and fucking rebooting the whole thing. That's what I'm trying to get at here, you have a man hired to write a new entry into the Ghostbusters series, and when he can't come up with something, instead of looking to the hundreds of stories written in the cartoons and comics, he just went "Welp I'm gonna just start from scratch and redo the first story" and that fucking SUCKS.
 

dalin80

Banned
Kinda my point tho. Do they really need to justify the swap beyond "because?" They're still people? If they were 4 black ghostbusters, would they need a "reason"?

Nothing that makes sense in context would need a reason, if it was 4 black Gb's and they were operating in a area of higher black population or a family business then everyone would just accept it without much fuss. Having no context for a complete gender swap obviously doesn't make much sense as it has caused so much discussion on a board that would break it's back to prove how PC it is.

Characters who are so well known and engraved in movie fans psyche can't just be hand waved away or changed without reason or it really stands out and becomes more of a focus then the movie itself.
 

MMaRsu

Banned
Can you please try to explain why you think women and black people would destroy the film's charm and wit?

Did I ever say that? Jesus christ yall are trying to paint me as some mysagonist racist or something while I deeply enjoy films that star a diverse cast of race and gender.

Im just saying if you are going to reboot a wildly known frnachise and use a very different cast then the original, the feel of that original movie is lost.

Jesus christ some of you fuckers really are dense as hell.

Also, MT when I go to the movies I will pick out a movie based on if it looks to be good, not if it has any black people in it. Jesus.
 

MThanded

I Was There! Official L Receiver 2/12/2016
Bannable? Lol. If this is a reboot, it's safe to say it will re-create a number of memorable scenes… The Dan Aykroyd ghost sex scene is pretty well-known.

And "adding to the discussion?" We're discussing Ghostbusters, not human rights in the Congo.
So since we aren't discussing human rights in the Congo you can drive by post about "ghost rape"
 

Atrophis

Member
There isnt. I just dont think these 4 women would fill the shoes of those classic roles.

This whole movie is going to be hot garbage. It will not have any of the charm and wit the original ghostbusters had.

Dat Spaceballs technology.

Colonel Sandurz: There's been a new breakthrough in home video marketing.
Dark Helmet: There has?
Colonel Sandurz: Yes! Instant cassettes. They're out in stores before the movie is finished!
 
Premature nitpicking? These things are UNIVERSAL through ALL versions of Ghostbusters: Ecto 1, Proton Packs. You can upgrade the car, you can upgrade the packs, you can change the model of the car, you can make the pack shoot out something other than protons, but getting rid of those things entirely is fucking ludicrous because they are massive staples to the franchise. Even the video game understood this. The Proton Packs are not mass produced by Apple. They were illegally assembled in a condemned firehouse by evicted college students.

OH THAT REMINDS ME

They're getting rid of the firehouse too.

So this Ghostbusters movie won't have the Ghostbusters characters, it won't have the firehouse, it won't have the car, and they're completely changing the method that they hunt ghosts.

People want it to be connected to the originals even without the whole original cast because there is an enormously rich and untapped world to explore and instead we're getting the exact same origin story again.

And yes I would have much rather someone go into the Real Ghostbusters well to adapt something like the amazing Boogyman arc into a movie over throwing in the towel and fucking rebooting the whole thing. That's what I'm trying to get at here, you have a man hired to write a new entry into the Ghostbusters series, and when he can't come up with something, instead of looking to the hundreds of stories written in the cartoons and comics, he just went "Welp I'm gonna just start from scratch and redo the first story" and that fucking SUCKS.

You've listed a number of significant changes that have already been revealed and then say that "we're getting the exact same origin story again."

Does not compute.
 
The original ghostbusters go on one last adventure and get trapped in another dimension just outside hells door and Dana Barrett and Janine Melnitz have no choice but to strap on proton packs and rescue the ghostbusters. A hilarious sci fi romp ensues.

See? An example of a storyline that holds true to the franchise with a mostly all female cast.
 

Yrael

Member
Did I ever say that?

There isnt. I just dont think these 4 women would fill the shoes of those classic roles.

This whole movie is going to be hot garbage. It will not have any of the charm and wit the original ghostbusters had.

I was getting that "charm and wit" part directly from you, actually.

So I'll ask again, or perhaps rephrase it like this: why is the charm and wit of the film dependent on the sex and ethnicity of the actors being as true as possible to that of the original cast?
 
Hopefully the black woman gets more screentime than Winston

Completely agree. I love the original two films, but poor old Ernie Hudson was blatantly in there as an afterthought.

I don't have much of an opinion about this really. I don't mind that they're rebooting with an all-female cast, and the only two I know are Wiig and McCarthy. Interested to see how this turns out.
 
I think I recognise one of them from Gilmore Girls, and.. that's all. Doesn't seems like they went for a high paycheck cast.

Melissa McCarthy is probably one of the most consistently successful comedy stars in the past few years. Even her film, Tammy, which was hated by both audiences and critics, still managed to make $85 million.
 

MMaRsu

Banned
I was getting that "charm and wit" part directly from you, actually.

So I'll ask again, or perhaps rephrase it like this: why is the charm and wit of the film dependent on the sex and ethnicity of the actors being as true as possible to that of the original cast?

Its not. The casting is just shit. Thats why I said the film wont have the same charm and wit. It has nothing to do with gender.
 

Daffy Duck

Member
Premature nitpicking? These things are UNIVERSAL through ALL versions of Ghostbusters: Ecto 1, Proton Packs. You can upgrade the car, you can upgrade the packs, you can change the model of the car, you can make the pack shoot out something other than protons, but getting rid of those things entirely is fucking ludicrous because they are massive staples to the franchise. Even the video game understood this. The Proton Packs are not mass produced by Apple. They were illegally assembled in a condemned firehouse by evicted college students.

OH THAT REMINDS ME

They're getting rid of the firehouse too.

So this Ghostbusters movie won't have the Ghostbusters characters, it won't have the firehouse, it won't have the car, and they're completely changing the method that they hunt ghosts.

People want it to be connected to the originals even without the whole original cast because there is an enormously rich and untapped world to explore and instead we're getting the exact same origin story again.

And yes I would have much rather someone go into the Real Ghostbusters well to adapt something like the amazing Boogyman arc into a movie over throwing in the towel and fucking rebooting the whole thing. That's what I'm trying to get at here, you have a man hired to write a new entry into the Ghostbusters series, and when he can't come up with something, instead of looking to the hundreds of stories written in the cartoons and comics, he just went "Welp I'm gonna just start from scratch and redo the first story" and that fucking SUCKS.

Where did you get all that info from?

I'm interested to know the premise for this film.
 

PBY

Banned
Completely agree. I love the original two films, but poor old Ernie Hudson was blatantly in there as an afterthought.

I don't have much of an opinion about this really. I don't mind that they're rebooting with an all-female cast, and the only two I know are Wiig and McCarthy. Interested to see how this turns out.
I'm not racist or anything, but I feel like giving more screen time to the black character takes away from the spirit of the originals. If you wanted a movie with a black lead why call it ghostbusters? Why not make something else?
 
I hope they have a male secretary. Seriously.

That said, I wish they had picked someone other than McCarthy--yes, I know she's brought in the bucks before, but I'm worried that they'll turn her character into a sterotype instead of a character. Honestly, that's my fear for the reboot no matter who was casted, what gender they are, or what race they are. Part of what made the original work so well is that the characters, thoughoff, felt rather grounded. I can see them gunning entirely for laughs and missing some of the point.

But anyone saying that the Ghostbusters couldn't be female or black or asian or anything else is hilariously unaware of their own shitty perspective.
 

dalin80

Banned
I'm not racist or anything, but I feel like giving more screen time to the black character takes away from the spirit of the originals. If you wanted a movie with a black lead why call it ghostbusters? Why not make something else?

Wow, really trying to wedge that strawman in there.
 

MMaRsu

Banned
I'm not racist or anything, but I feel like giving more screen time to the black character takes away from the spirit of the originals. If you wanted a movie with a black lead why call it ghostbusters? Why not make something else?

Pfff jesus way to be an obtuse ass about it. Holy shit. Peterb0y and his non arguments.
 

Yrael

Member
Its not. The casting is just shit. Thats why I said the film wont have the same charm and wit. It has nothing to do with gender.

That's certainly not what you were saying earlier (the film with four women being something that men would only see with their girlfriends, etc).
 
Don't care that much that they have 4 women this time around, but they missed a golden opportunity not having Tina Fey and Amy Poheler somewhere in that group.
 
Did I ever say that? Jesus christ yall are trying to paint me as some mysagonist racist or something while I deeply enjoy films that star a diverse cast of race and gender.

Im just saying if you are going to reboot a wildly known frnachise and use a very different cast then the original, the feel of that original movie is lost.

Jesus christ some of you fuckers really are dense as hell.

Also, MT when I go to the movies I will pick out a movie based on if it looks to be good, not if it has any black people in it. Jesus.

That's just how OT GAF is. If you don't automatically hate white males then they try to paint you as a bad person. It's really quite sad.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom