Yea well then why did you have miller trackers in your.... Oh right.
And your role in HP was also rough as it contained towns only recourse against the second scum night kill. Rip snape vs snake showdown.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
WWE Mafia |OT| Royal Rumble Superstars of Wrestling MMXVI
- Thread starter nin1000
- Start date
Yea well then why did you have miller trackers in your.... Oh right.
And your role in HP was also rough as it contained towns only recourse against the second scum night kill. Rip snape vs snake showdown.
CornBurrito
Member
No clue. But that's why we have 3 irl days.
Lover we have experience in mislynching d1 based on scumhunting.
That "experience" is precisely why I'm calling bullshit on your bullshit
CornBurrito
Member
This is like watching your parents fighting....
In the event of a divorce I think I'll live with Splinter instead of Cabot.
In the event of a divorce I think I'll live with Splinter instead of Cabot.
I mean I would agree with this logic a lot more if scum hadn't just tried this very move in the most recent game. One which Burb ran. I'm not buying it.
CornBurrito
Member
That "experience" is precisely why I'm calling bullshit on your bullshit
Could you explain this more?
Think how much easier it will be to sneak booze for you and your friends to drink if you live with Cabot though....
I did not follow the previous set of games. How quickly were the scum lynched? If it's happened recently as you say, I am much more likely to give burb benefit of the doubt here.
CornBurrito
Member
I'm 23.
Me and blarg were lynched on day 2.
I stand by my statement.
CornBurrito
Member
I would like to hear more from scraftydevil.
What do you think of the Burb situation?
What do you think of the Burb situation?
Well it's pure meta but
Last game Cabot and I (as lovers) were only clears in one thing for D1: we wanted to (if in doubt) lynch low activity players. This was to avoid a repeat of WW2 (which you may remember)
HOWEVER we fucked up and lynched NeverTim, and went on to regret (and sure enough the game got a bit WW-y later on). If anything I'd expect this to strengthen Cabot's resolve.
So him already positioning for a Burb lynch is weird, especially since I know that Burb is someone who's reads are respected/feared depending on alignment.
All that said, I don't feel much scumminess in cabot's posts so far, and his position is not unreasonable (in isolation, at least), so I'm mostly just taking the opportunity to tickle him until something more interesting happens.
Hey. I am pro Day 1 Miller claim.
It's obviously a tough place to be put in, so I think it makes sense to get out of the way. The circumstance mentioned where it goes real bad and the cop investigates you and claims to get you killed is really disastrous. Now we can have Burb on the radar but there's no rush to deal with it.
It's obviously a tough place to be put in, so I think it makes sense to get out of the way. The circumstance mentioned where it goes real bad and the cop investigates you and claims to get you killed is really disastrous. Now we can have Burb on the radar but there's no rush to deal with it.
Terrabyte20xx
Junior Wrestlemania XXX Champion
Hey guys, what's going on?
Oh, a Miller! I'm inclined to give day one Miller claims the benefit of the doubt, so I think we can trust Burb FOR NOW. Obviously we have to keep an eye on him but I think the way he's handled it so far makes sense.
Seems like a scum move tbh
ScraftyDevil
Banned
LA DIABLA needed her beauty sleep, but now she is here to teach all pretenders what it means to be THE CHAMP
I think that Punk's claim of being a face is believable, BUT, like many others have said, that shouldn't excuse any excessively HEEL-like behaviour we see from him. And as it should always be for claimed individuals, if they last a suspicious number of rounds, WE PUT THEM IN THE GROUND
Eh, I can understand this reaction from him. Until I have a better choice, my vote stays on him though. burb knows it's not personal.
Oh, my vote IS personal.
I know nin is trying to encourage gif use, but please post SOMETHING along with it. It feels like posts with just gifs are going to be much harder to keep track of later on when we need to research something.
Maybe not a specific #xamxiety situation, but I just checked the Archer ordinary role PM, and the win condition was 'You win when all KGB are eliminated'.
That game had a killing neutral role, with a win condition. So we should remain cautious of neutrals.
I thought the gif was pretty clear. I thought that was a lazy post.
It was a request meant for everyone, sorry. I'm just worried someone can skate on nothing but reaction gifs which will be damned hard to sort through later on.
Yea I specifically meant SK who has to be last man standing, but point taken.
I'm a two-shot bulletproof ascetic serial killer gossip. Please leave me alone, I work for town.
fix'd
Xamtheking
Member
No, you're an 8-shot bulletproof miller vigilante
Seems legit
UNVOTE
(I realise my vote was actually on cabot, need a better vote anyway)
On my lunch break so here are some thoughts on the Burb situation. I'm leaning towards believing him. It'd be a pretty risky play for scum to put themselves in the spotlight right from the start like this IMO, and it seems like from links posted that standard Miller play is to claim D1.
So, if Burb is telling the truth, what he turns into is a kinda 'bulletproof' town (assuming that he is just a Miller, which gives scum not that much incentive to kill him) who's forced to behave very town-like in order to survive all the extra scrutiny placed on him for being a Miller. Not too bad to keep around, IMO.
In the case of Burb being a Miller, wouldn't it be scum's best interest to keep him alive? He can take up town discussion time and will always have at least a little bit of suspicion on him due to being Miller.
So, if Burb is telling the truth, what he turns into is a kinda 'bulletproof' town (assuming that he is just a Miller, which gives scum not that much incentive to kill him) who's forced to behave very town-like in order to survive all the extra scrutiny placed on him for being a Miller. Not too bad to keep around, IMO.
It can work both ways, a scum could latch onto a miller lynch because it's not seen as bad play to go for the claim. For scum, it's good because they kill someone they know not to be scum, and they dont look suspicious doing it.
Leaving them alive is also a good play because it's a constant source of suspicion as the game goes on.
I'd say a scum would benefit from a miller lynch, but not a miller Night Kill, those are pretty rare.
Scum have two options regarding a miller. They can try to use him as a backup lynch if they think town can be swayed. It's something they'd keep in their back pocket until a member of the scum team is in trouble. However, if town seems to believe their claim, it effectively makes them a named townie, and it's always in scum's interest to kill confirmed townies.
Sure. My Named Townie thought is under the assumption that the miller gained that status by solid play. A shitty miller will always end up lynched and nobody will feel bad about it. That's worst case scenario for town.
Yeah, I guess what I'm trying to say is that Burb voluntarily put a timer on himself to be helpful or get lynched, so we should give him a chance.
I feel like I might have caused this Burb discussion to go on for too long, so later once we can expect people to get off work/classes/generally be free and caught up and stuff I'll try to help put some pressure on those who haven't been so active.
I feel like I might have caused this Burb discussion to go on for too long, so later once we can expect people to get off work/classes/generally be free and caught up and stuff I'll try to help put some pressure on those who haven't been so active.
Haha yeah I read a lot of Gafia while waiting for midseason sign ups...@.@