Are you fucking insane? He went five sets with the best player in the world right now.
He would have gotten straight-setted if he was "terrible".
Some idiotic posts in this thread. "Federer played horribly." "Worst demolition I've seen." Djokovic barely won, Djokovic was up by only six points total. Both players got broken a bunch of times. Two sets were tiebreakers. This is the definition of a competitive game.
Some seriously shitty posts/trolls in this thread.
Well played Novak. Deserved in the end. And Fed still getting to GS finals at his age, still having the hunger after everything he's won, incredible too.
Men's tennis is so good right now. Just need some of the younglings to make steps up.
Well played Novak. Deserved in the end. And Fed still getting to GS finals at his age, still having the hunger after everything he's won, incredible too.
Men's tennis is so good right now. Just need some of the younglings to make steps up.
That was moving like shit on the court. Novak didn't play good tennis. Fed just can't help himself from choking away his chances.
Some idiotic posts in this thread. "Federer played horribly." "Worst demolition I've seen." Djokovic barely won, Djokovic was up by only six points total. Both players got broken a bunch of times. Two sets were tiebreakers. This is the definition of a competitive game.
Some seriously shitty posts/trolls in this thread.
Now he knows how roddick felt in 2009. Oh wait, he can just dry his tears with his 7 other Wimbledon championship trophies. Roddick never won onesomeone gif that Roger tear pleeeaaaaaaaaase
There's also no logical reason to think Federer played horrible tennis today, and yet, here we are.
Now he knows how roddick felt in 2009. Oh wait, he can just dry his tears with his 7 other Wimbledon championship trophies. Roddick never won one
Some idiotic posts in this thread. "Federer played horribly." "Worst demolition I've seen." Djokovic barely won, Djokovic was up by only six points total. Both players got broken a bunch of times. Two sets were tiebreakers. This is the definition of a competitive game.
Some seriously shitty posts/trolls in this thread.
The person I was replying to was talking about the women's final...
my bad dude
Fed in my opinion played horrible. That 5th set is what I based my opinion. He was horrible, rushing the net on horrible setup shots, he was horrible from the baseline as well. How can he compete today when the game is so baseline dominant and be so bad at it. He was pushing the ball back at Novak, not trying to win any points and just hoping for Novak to make errors. From the baseline he looked any different than having a warmup, that's how comfortable Novak looked against him.
And for the most bizarre stat in history:
Djokovic has two grass titles. Both of them are Wimbledons
Djokovic has NINE clay titles. None of them are French Opens
dafuq
And for the most bizarre stat in history:
Djokovic has two grass titles. Both of them are Wimbledons
Djokovic has NINE clay titles. None of them are French Opens
dafuq
Nine clay tournaments where Nadal wasn't entered.
Nine clay tournaments where Nadal wasn't entered.
Now he knows how roddick felt in 2009. Oh wait, he can just dry his tears with his 7 other Wimbledon championship trophies. Roddick never won one
Nope. I'm not ignoring anything. I only saw the 5th set, thus that's all I can base my opinion on. By the way Novak didn't even play well and was moving horrible as well in that set.So ignore the other four sets and take a handful of points and come to a conclusion, gotcha. In that case, you're absolutely right.
Looking forward to hardcourt season. Rallys are too short for my liking on grass