• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

2011-2012 TV Show Cancellation Thread - CSI Miami just got *takes off shades* canned

Status
Not open for further replies.

Slayven

Member
Zoe said:
I'm pleasantly surprised that X Factor isn't hitting it out of the park.
Me too, maybe people were burned out by the ad blitz. The pushed that shit hard, I thought was going to come in and killed Idol and defile it's corpse.
 

cory.

Banned
Whitney isn't going anywhere for now, but Community and Outsourced had better premieres in that timeslot.
Person of Interest should be fine, if a little weak by CBS standards.
Charlie's Angels is going to drop next week.
Prime Suspect is in danger.
 

RBH

Member
ogk9U.png



http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/20...starts-for-whitney-person-of-interest/104656/



This may be a dumb question, but is there any sort of correlation between the 18-49 rating and the number of viewers or the share? I'm just curious because I noticed how Community and Prime Suspect are separated by 0.1 in the 18-49 rating, yet Prime Suspect had two million more viewers.
 
RBH said:
his may be a dumb question, but is there any sort of correlation between the 18-49 rating and the number of viewers or the share? I'm just curious because I noticed how Community and Prime Suspect are separated by 0.1 in the 18-49 rating, yet Prime Suspect had two million more viewers.
Completely different time slots, you can't compare those.
 

Dunlop

Member
Vamphuntr said:
If there's a justice Ringer will get cancelled (Or else it will bring down Sarah Michelle Gellar with it).


This, my wife trapped into watching this POS with her.

All my childhood fantasies of Buffy went up in smoke
 

cory.

Banned
RBH said:
This may be a dumb question, but is there any sort of correlation between the 18-49 rating and the number of viewers or the share? I'm just curious because I noticed how Community and Prime Suspect are separated by 0.1 in the 18-49 rating, yet Prime Suspect had two million more viewers.
It means that Community had a higher percentage of viewers 18-49 watching out of its total viewers than Prime Suspect. And yeah, different timeslots.
 

RBH

Member
cory. said:
It means that Community had a higher percentage of viewers 18-49 watching out of its total viewers than Prime Suspect. And yeah, different timeslots.
Ah.

Thank you.
 

Stumpokapow

listen to the mad man
RBH said:
This may be a dumb question, but is there any sort of correlation between the 18-49 rating and the number of viewers or the share? I'm just curious because I noticed how Community and Prime Suspect are separated by 0.1 in the 18-49 rating, yet Prime Suspect had two million more viewers.

Number of viewers = total number of viewers of any age.

18-49 rating = Number of Nielsen points worth of 18-49 year olds who watched the show. A Nielsen point is 1 percent of the country's total TV households (a point is currently 1.15 million, but it changes)

Share = Percentage of all televisions watching tv that time slot that were watching this program in specific.

So for example if 50% of all TV households were watching TV, a 10 share would imply that 5% of all TV households were watching that particular program. If 80% of all TV households were watching TV, 10 share implies 8% of all.

Why 18-49? Advertising sales rates are based on 18-49 viewers. The entire purpose of Nielsen ratings and the entire predictive value that it has upon cancellation decisions is for advertising sales purposes. Non 18-49 numbers are only good for PR bragging (A gazillion people watched out shitty show!) rather than actual revenue.
 

RBH

Member
Stumpokapow said:
Number of viewers = total number of viewers of any age.

18-49 rating = Number of Nielsen points worth of 18-49 year olds who watched the show. A Nielsen point is 1 percent of the country's total TV households (currently 1.15 million, but it changes)

Share = Percentage of all televisions watching tv that time slot that were watching this program in specific.

So for example if 50% of all TV households were watching TV, a 10 share would imply that 5% of all TV households were watching that particular program. If 80% of all TV households were watching TV, 10 share implies 8% of all.

Why 18-49? Advertising sales rates are based on 18-49 viewers. The entire purpose of Nielsen ratings and the entire predictive value that it has upon cancellation decisions is for advertising sales purposes. Non 18-49 numbers are only good for PR bragging (A gazillion people watched out shitty show!) rather than actual revenue.
Wow, very much appreciated Stump. :)


Granger Danger said:
Prime Suspect probably skews a lot older, the elderly just love their cop stories.
I don't really follow many TV shows in general nowadays, but I managed to catch Prime Suspect last night and thought it was great. I just hope that its numbers improve over the next few weeks. :(
 

Busty

Banned
Person Of Interest didn't bomb but it didn't have quite the blockbuster debut CBS were probably hoping for, but it was a solid start anyway. I imagine if both POI and The Mentalist can do these sorts of numbers week in, week out they'd probably be happy.

Shocked by the numbers that Prime Suspect's debut pulled in. A 1.8/5 is a horrendous rating considering the fact it's based on a (fairly?) well known UK show and an outright member of TV royalty in Maria Bello is starring in it.

NBC just cannot buy a decent debut for a new show never mind a hit.

NotTheGuyYouKill said:
For Parks and Community, are these ratings decent?

For NBC they are juuuuuuust fine. But in saying that Whitney is guaranteed to shit the bed next week owing to the strong hate that show generated.
 

ivysaur12

Banned
RepairmanJack said:
I am actually shocked Charlie's Angels did decent. Now to see if the viewers stick around...

It didn't do decently and they probably won't. Those numbers are fairly horrendous and I don't see it growing.

If Revenge makes it to season 2, I would almost be okay with ABC moving Castle to the 8pm spot.
 

Busty

Banned
Granger Danger said:
How is she TV royalty when her biggest TV role to date is a recurring spot on ER?

Well she's a 'name' (or should that be face) in TV terms and really who else would have been able to take on the iconic (if you're British anyway) Helen Mirren role?

But regardless of us arguing about the merits of Maria Bello (surely the first time that's been written on the Internet) those are horrible premiere numbers for the show. Even for NBC.
 
ivysaur12 said:
It didn't do decently and they probably won't. Those numbers are fairly horrendous and I don't see it growing.

How are those not considered decent going up against Big Bang and X Factor? Sure not the best in demo, but for it's timeslot I would definitely consider it decent.
 

ivysaur12

Banned
RepairmanJack said:
How are those not considered decent going up against Big Bang and X Factor? Sure not the best in demo, but for it's timeslot I would definitely consider it decent.

If this was week 7 or 8 and it was doing a 2.1? Sure, maybe. But this is week 1, those numbers will slide to something in the mid 1s.
 
ivysaur12 said:
If this was week 7 or 8 and it was doing a 2.1? Sure, maybe. But this is week 1, those numbers will slide to something in the mid 1s.

Well sure, I'm not debating that. Those stand alone numbers though, are somewhat decent. I'm just surprised it didn't bomb out of the gate.
 

ivysaur12

Banned
RepairmanJack said:
Well sure, I'm not debating that. Those stand alone numbers though, are somewhat decent. I'm just surprised it didn't bomb out of the gate.

There's no such things as "stand-alone." Yeah, those numbers are better than My Generation, but the show probably isn't going to get a back 9 if it follows the general television trend.

If it had premiered in the mid-to-high 2s, then yeah, that would have been decent. These? They aren't decent. They're kind of bad.

EDIT: Also, WOOF at The Secret Circle. It's matching Ringer now with a much better lead-in. Poor CW.

EDIT 2: Watching Charlie's Angels now. I thought women couldn't serve in combat roles in the military? Also, this show is horrendously terrible in almost every way. Why, Minka, why?!
 

ivysaur12

Banned
What I would do based off of last night's performances:

- Up All Night stays, Free Agents sent to die
- Fear Factor replaces Harry's Law
- Harry's Law goes to Mondays at 10pm
- BFFs follows Up All Night (BFFs is funnier than Bent, but I think would be a better match for Up All Night?). OR, Bent follows Up All Night while BFFs waits in the wings
- Prime Suspect gets 13 and is done
- Awake goes 10pm Thursdays at midseason

Awake will only have to go against The Mentalist, Private Practice, and Jersey Shore. Sunny isn't really a ratings threat.

- Feel Charlie's Angels out. I would also be tempted to move Castle to Thursdays at 8 and put Scandal on Mondays, but I don't know. Also, order more episodes of Scandal (only 7 right now)
- Keep Revenge on Wednesdays, full season order in the next few weeks if it holds in the mid-2s.
- I don't know what I would do about The River, doesn't really fit into anything else on ABC.
 
Damn a brutal night last night. Charlie's Angels flopped, Prime Suspect flopped, and Person of Interest will be at flop numbers (for CBS) in a few weeks probably. Don't even get me started on The CW.
 
How the hell did Whitney get so many people? No competition really after the Office there really wasn't anything else to watch unless you jump in halfway. I threw in a dvd. I hope people turn away from that show quickly.
 
Terra Nova will probably get canned.

I love scifi and will probably love the show, but scifi always tends to do shitty, even if its good. Just like Firefly. Just like Stargate....
 

ivysaur12

Banned
dead souls said:
Damn a brutal night last night. Charlie's Angels flopped, Prime Suspect flopped, and Person of Interest will be at flop numbers (for CBS) in a few weeks probably. Don't even get me started on The CW.

I'm less concerned with Person of Interest. CBS shows have shown they can grow (under the right circumstances). It's probably a better fit for 10pm, anyways. I also enjoyed Prime Suspect more than I thought I would, so that 1.8 kind of irks me. Either way, it's not as older-skewing as HARRY'S FUCK LAW WHICH IS STILL SOMEHOW ON TV.


HammerOfThor said:
Terra Nova will probably get canned.

I love scifi and will probably love the show, but scifi always tends to do shitty, even if its good. Just like Firefly. Just like Stargate....

I don't... what? No.
 

Qwomo

Junior Member
I've always wondered: do television studios ever look at torrent download numbers to gauge viewership?
 

Tamanon

Banned
Qwomo said:
I've always wondered: do television studios ever look at torrent download numbers to gauge viewership?

Probably not as that's not ad revenue they can look at, the whole point of ratings.
 

ivysaur12

Banned
Qwomo said:
I've always wondered: do television studios ever look at torrent download numbers to gauge viewership?

Eh, kind of. They look at them along with Nielsen + DVR + legitimate streaming numbers to gauge the level of piracy on certain shows. But the more popular a show is, the more likely it is to be pirated. Fox might be looking at them now because they aren't putting their shows on Hulu until after a delayed period of time. Though while piracy might be up, they might also argue that they've had some of their best scripted launches ever for the fall, so who knows.

If a show is big, it's big everywhere = Live, DVR, legit streaming, and piracy. Very rarely (if ever) is a show much bigger in online viewing than in live numbers.

And in terms of online viewing, right now they're making "digital nickels." There's definitely some ad revenue to be made from online viewing, but it's nothing compared to live viewing. One day, maybe. But advertisers are scared of online viewing.

Expect more product placement in the future.
 

Qwomo

Junior Member
Tamanon said:
Probably not as that's not ad revenue they can look at, the whole point of ratings.
Ah, good point.
ivysaur12 said:
Eh, kind of. They look at them along with Nielsen + DVR + legitimate streaming numbers to gauge the level of piracy on certain shows. But the more popular a show is, the more likely it is to be pirated. Fox might be looking at them now because they aren't putting their shows on Hulu until after a delayed period of time. Though while piracy might be up, they might also argue that they've had some of their best scripted launches ever for the fall, so who knows.

If a show is big, it's big everywhere = Live, DVR, legit streaming, and piracy. Very rarely (if ever) is a show much bigger in online viewing than in live numbers.

And in terms of online viewing, right now they're making "digital nickels." There's definitely some ad revenue to be made from online viewing, but it's nothing compared to live viewing. One day, maybe. But advertisers are scared of online viewing.

Expect more product placement in the future.
Iiinteresting!
 
Qwomo said:
I've always wondered: do television studios ever look at torrent download numbers to gauge viewership?

like that other poster said prob not but they do check on hulu views. the scrubs creator guy said so when he was trying to save scrubs. im guessing a strong showing on hulu wouldnt save a show. but it could prove there was an audience out there for something and maybe help convince a network to leave it on the air longer or try a different way to market it.
 

ivysaur12

Banned
goldenticket said:
like that other poster said prob not but they do check on hulu views. the scrubs creator guy said so when he was trying to save scrubs. im guessing a strong showing on hulu wouldnt save a show. but it could prove there was an audience out there for something and maybe help convince a network to leave it on the air longer or try a different way to market it.

If Hulu got CBS content, it'd be a game changer. But Les Moonves isn't about it. And you can also find shows still on Fox.com, Abc.com, and Nbc.com. I also think this would help the CW, which has a terrible streaming service. But WB really doesn't like online content, so who knows.

Hulu *could* be an interesting solution, but the problem with Hulu is that it also needs to get a 3rd party (such as Nielsen) to look at its numbers. And 3rd party numbers are coming in much lower than what Hulu reports. So those issues need to be figured out. Also, it's much harder to get demographic data off of Hulu.

Nielsen is supposed to start reporting online viewing numbers sometime in the future, but they hit some technical roadblocks. Like, when you viewed something online, it showed that no one actually watched the episode. So there's that. More channels (networks and cable) need to embrace online contant while also figuring out a way to make sizable ad revenue off of it. At this point, online-only content isn't going to be feasible on a large budget (not something like Husbands or The Guild). But I do believe that we're at a point where it would be possible for online ad revenue to definitely help support a show that may be on a bubble. There's money to be made. Networks just need to get on it.

But advertisers hate change so who knows.

EDIT: I also think that shows like Harry's Law, Blue Bloods, Dancing With the Stars, and now Prime Suspect that skew unbelievably old could have a future given the right marketing. But the revenues are so much lower because it's so easy to reach old people everywhere.

Cialis and AARP commercials for everyone!
 

Takao

Banned
I know no one cares about Saturday morning cartoons, but here's the ratings from last week where the blocks (sort of kind of not really) debuted their schedules:

Final K6-11 Ratings for Saturday, September 17, 2011 Broadcast Networks only (Live + SD Data):
Source: Disney Research from Nielsen Media Research Data

CW (Toonzai) 0.7/3Avg. (7a-12p)
Magi-Nation 0.2/2; Magi-Nation 0.5/4; Sonic X 0.8/5; Sonic X 0.8/4; Yu-Gi-Oh 0.8/3; Sonic X 1.0/4; Dragon Ball Z Kai 0.7/3; Dragon Ball Z Kai 0.6/3; Tai Chi Chasers 0.5/2; Yu-Gi-Oh 0.5/2

NBC (Qubo on NBC)Avg. 0.5/2 (9a-12p)
Willa's Wild Life 0.4/2; Pearlie 0.4/2; Turbo Dogs 0.3/1; Shelldon 0.6/2; Magic School Bus 0.7/3; Babar 0.5/2

CBS (CookieJarTV) 0.3/1 Avg. (10a-12p)
Doodlebops Rockin Road Show 0.2/1; Doodlebops Rockin Road Show 0.3/1; Busytown Mysteries 0.3/2; Danger Rangers 0.3/2; Busytown Mysteries 0.5/2; Horseland 0.3/2

ABC dropped out of the Saturday morning block this month, and instead of getting a third party to provide content (like the other blocks), they got one to make a 9-13 year old aimed block. As such, its viewer ship numbers are hidden. They're probably absolutely terrible.

CW finally is first in something!
 

WillyFive

Member
Saturday Morning Cartoons....from the networks? What is this, the 90's?

At least post the ratings from the cartoon channels. They actually have new shows there, and many people also wanted to see which gets cancelled and which live to see another season.
 

ivysaur12

Banned
Takao said:
I know no one cares about Saturday morning cartoons, but here's the ratings from last week where the blocks (sort of kind of not really) debuted their schedules:

Final K6-11 Ratings for Saturday, September 17, 2011 Broadcast Networks only (Live + SD Data):
Source: Disney Research from Nielsen Media Research Data

CW (Toonzai) 0.7/3Avg. (7a-12p)
Magi-Nation 0.2/2; Magi-Nation 0.5/4; Sonic X 0.8/5; Sonic X 0.8/4; Yu-Gi-Oh 0.8/3; Sonic X 1.0/4; Dragon Ball Z Kai 0.7/3; Dragon Ball Z Kai 0.6/3; Tai Chi Chasers 0.5/2; Yu-Gi-Oh 0.5/2

NBC (Qubo on NBC)Avg. 0.5/2 (9a-12p)
Willa's Wild Life 0.4/2; Pearlie 0.4/2; Turbo Dogs 0.3/1; Shelldon 0.6/2; Magic School Bus 0.7/3; Babar 0.5/2

CBS (CookieJarTV) 0.3/1 Avg. (10a-12p)
Doodlebops Rockin Road Show 0.2/1; Doodlebops Rockin Road Show 0.3/1; Busytown Mysteries 0.3/2; Danger Rangers 0.3/2; Busytown Mysteries 0.5/2; Horseland 0.3/2

ABC dropped out of the Saturday morning block this month, and instead of getting a third party to provide content (like the other blocks), they got one to make a 9-13 year old aimed block. As such, its viewer ship numbers are hidden. They're probably absolutely terrible.

CW finally is first in something!

No surprise. Kids WB dominated back in the day and the Toonzai rebrand has been gold for the CW.

Still, Nick rules with Spongebob + Power Rangers.
 

Takao

Banned
Willy105 said:
Saturday Morning Cartoons....from the networks? What is this, the 90's?

At least post the ratings from the cartoon channels. They actually have new shows there, and many people also wanted to see which gets cancelled and which live to see another season.

Actually, Tai Chi Chasers is a brand new show that's been seen by no one outside of Korea. Its debut is less than Sonic X episodes from 5 years ago... There's also new episodes of Dragon Ball Kai, and Magi-Nation which the CW haven't picked up yet. Lastly, they're set to premiere the newest Yu-Gi-Oh! show next month.

Can you tell which network tries?
 

WillyFive

Member
Ratings for Saturday Mornings on the cable networks:

Final K6-11 Ratings for Saturday, September 17, 2011 Cable Networks only (Live + SD Data):
Source: Disney Research from Nielsen Media Research Data

DISNEY CHANNEL* 3.9/20 Avg. (7a-1p)
Mickey Mouse Clubhouse 3.1/18; Phineas and Ferb 3.4/15; Phineas and Ferb 4.0/18; A.N.T. Farm 4.2/18; A.N.T. Farm 4.6/21; Shake It Up 4.6/21; Shake It Up 4.2/20; Wizards of Waverly Place 4.3/21; Wizards of Waverly Place 4.3/22
*While the Saturday average ratings include the numbers for the strict daypart 7a-1p, on this particular morning Disney Channel had a movie they ran beginning in the earlier daypart block (from 6:30a) and the individual segments were not broken out for inclusion in this chart.

NICKELODEON 3.5/18 Avg. (7a-1p)
Fairly OddParents 1.3/15; Fairly OddParents 1.8/15; Fanboy & Chum Chum 2.8/17; SpongeBob SquarePants 3.6/19; SpongeBob SquarePants 5.0/23; SpongeBob SquarePants 5.4/24; SpongeBob SquarePants 5.8/25; T.U.F.F. Puppy 4.2/19; T.U.F.F. Puppy 3.8/17; Penguins of Madagascar 3.7/17; Power Rangers Samurai 2.4/12; Supah Ninjas 1.8/9

CARTOON NETWORK 1.6/8 Avg. (7a-1p)
Ben 10: Ultimate Alien 0.0/11; Star Wars: Clone Wars 1.5/10; Beyblade: Metal Masters 1.0/10; Pokemon: Black & White 2.4/11; Redaki: Conquer the Kairu 1.4/6; Bakugan: Mechtanium Surge 1.2/5; Johnny Test 1.4/6; Almost Naked Animals 1.3/6; Almost Naked Animals 1.2/6; The Looney Tunes Show 1.7/8; The Looney Tunes Show 2.4/12

DISNEY XD 0.6/3 Avg. (7a-1p)
Suite Life of Zack & Cody 0.2/3; Phineas and Ferb 0.4/3; Phineas and Ferb 0.6/4; Kick Buttowski0.6/3; Pair of Kings 0.6/3; Pair of Kings 0.8/3; Kickin It 0.8/3; Kickin It 0.8/4; Kung-Fu Magoo (1x105) 0.6/3; Kick Buttowski Shorts (1x15) 0.5/3
ivysaur12 said:
Still, Nick rules with Spongebob + Power Rangers.

Those ratings for Spongebob are always mindboggling.

Takao said:
Its debut is less than Sonic X episodes from 5 years ago...

Well, that's disappointing.
 
Did anyone actually watch Person of Interest? Yeesh on the show as a whole - overwrought, laughably-acted crap. Jesus. See what I did there?
 

Takao

Banned
ivysaur12 said:
No surprise. Kids WB dominated back in the day and the Toonzai rebrand has been gold for the CW.

Still, Nick rules with Spongebob + Power Rangers.

The problem with Toonzai is that it's run by a company who filed for Chapter 11 this year, and might lose their only guaranteed cash cow (Yu-Gi-Oh!) in a lawsuit. I believe they have the air time on the CW bought until 2014 or 2015.

It would be interesting if one of the networks abandoned their air space in favour of a Hasbro Studios run block pomoting The Hub. I think having a new Transformers, GI Joe, Duel Masters, and even My Little Pony series airing would make broadcast children's television a lot more interesting. As it stands, The Hub is doing more harm than good to those shows.

Willy105 said:
Ratings for Saturday Mornings on the cable networks:

Just a note, the cable networks ratings are done differently. Disney XD's share is almost the same as Toonzai's, but Toonzai should actually have a considerably larger total viewers amount IIRC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom